Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Employment lawData protectionHR practiceStaff monitoring

Legal Q&A: Surveillance in the workplace

by Michael Bradshaw 1 Sep 2011
by Michael Bradshaw 1 Sep 2011

Employers will choose to monitor their employees for a variety of reasons, for example to safeguard their employees, to protect business interests, to ensure quality of customer service and to comply with legal and regulatory obligations. Employers need to be aware of how they can monitor staff lawfully.

Q Can an employer monitor its employees?

An employer can monitor its employees, but it must do so in a way that is consistent with a range of legal obligations. These include the requirements of the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 (RIPA), Telecommunications (Lawful Business Practice) (Interception of Communications) Regulations 2000 (LBP Regulations) and the Data Protection Act 1998. The implied obligation of trust and confidence is also relevant and the various legal obligations will be taken into account by an employment tribunal where monitoring is a feature of the case, eg if it has formed part of the investigatory process in a dismissal case.

Q What about an employee’s right to privacy?

The Human Rights Act 1998 and the right to private life are highly relevant in this context; for private sector employers these principles are enshrined in the other pieces of legislation and legal considerations referred to here. The law recognises that employees may understandably feel that monitoring is very intrusive and be concerned that confidential or sensitive information will be seen by those without a business need to know it. Therefore, employers are required to try to strike a fair balance between an employee’s legitimate expectation to privacy and the interest of the employer.

Q What sort of monitoring can take place?

To obtain a balanced approach, the law distinguishes between targeted (individual) and systematic monitoring (where all employees/ groups of employees are monitored in the same way as a matter of routine), and between open and covert monitoring. All of these may be lawful, providing the requisite controls are in place. There is also a crucial distinction between monitoring accessed communications and intercepting unaccessed ones. The latter is known as the “interception” of electronic communications (eg telephone calls, faxes, emails and internet access). An interception occurs when, in the course of its transmission, the contents of a communication are made available to someone other than the sender or intended recipient (eg reading an email before it is read by the intended recipient). Interception of electronic communications is highly regulated and may be carried out by the employer only in strict accordance with RIPA and LBP Regulations. A failure to do so may give rise to criminal sanctions.

Q What steps should employers take?

Employers should ensure that employees are aware of the nature and extent of monitoring that may take place in the workplace. The employer must be clear about the levels of privacy an employee can or cannot expect when using the employer’s systems for personal communications. Clear and easily accessible policy statements are a must and a level of informed consent may be required in certain circumstances. Policies should also explain how the employer will use any information that has been obtained via monitoring and the safeguards that are in place for the workers who are subject to the monitoring.

For any monitoring, an impact assessment will be vital and, so far as possible, monitoring should be on a systematic basis. Where specific and targeted monitoring is required the impact assessment and appropriate safeguards will be even more important.

The impact assessment is to determine whether monitoring is necessary, and if it is, how it may be carried out. Any monitoring must be proportionate to the issue the employer seeks to address. In carrying out an impact assessment an employer must identify:

  • the purpose behind the monitoring arrangement and the benefits it is likely to deliver;
  • any likely adverse impact of the monitoring arrangement;
  • any alternatives to monitoring or different ways in which it might be carried out;
  • the obligations that arise from monitoring (especially how the information obtained through monitoring will be stored and processed in accordance with the Data Protection Act); and
  • whether or not monitoring is justified.

Q Can an employer monitor employees without their knowledge?

There may be occasions where an employer decides that covert monitoring is justified. These occasions will be rare and exist where open monitoring is likely to prejudice the prevention or detection of crime or equivalent malpractice or the apprehension or prosecution of offenders. Again, the impact assessment process will be even more important in these instances, as will relevant safeguards.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Michael Bradshaw, partner, Charles Russell LLP

FAQs from XpertHR

  • What are the implications for employers of art.8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (the right to respect for private and family life, home and correspondence)?
  • Where an employer has reason to believe that an employee absent on sick leave is working elsewhere can it arrange for covert surveillance?
  • Is an employer under an obligation to seek employees’ permission before placing their photographs on its intranet?

Michael Bradshaw

previous post
Productive performance – optimising individual performance and realising potential
next post
Helping healthcare employers to prepare for sharps Directive

You may also like

Fire and rehire: the relocation question

22 May 2025

Minister defends Employment Rights Bill at Acas conference

16 May 2025

CBI chair Soames accuses ministers of not listening...

16 May 2025

EHRC bows to pressure and extends gender consultation

15 May 2025

‘Polygamous working’ is a minefield for HR

14 May 2025

Contract cleaner loses EAT race discrimination appeal

14 May 2025

Four ways employers can reduce the risk of...

14 May 2025

Construction workers win compensation claim against defunct employer

9 May 2025

Zero-hours workers’ rights to be extended from beyond...

8 May 2025

Employment tribunal backlog up 23% in a year

7 May 2025

  • 2025 Employee Communications Report PROMOTED | HR and leadership...Read more
  • The Majority of Employees Have Their Eyes on Their Next Move PROMOTED | A staggering 65%...Read more
  • Prioritising performance management: Strategies for success (webinar) WEBINAR | In today’s fast-paced...Read more
  • Self-Leadership: The Key to Successful Organisations PROMOTED | Eletive is helping businesses...Read more
  • Retaining Female Talent: Four Ways to Reduce Workplace Drop Out PROMOTED | International Women’s Day...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+