Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • Maternity & Paternity
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • Maternity & Paternity
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Vicarious liabilityLatest NewsData protection

Morrisons granted permission to take data breach case to Supreme Court

by Jo Faragher 17 Apr 2019
by Jo Faragher 17 Apr 2019 Chris Radburn/PA Wire/PA Images
Chris Radburn/PA Wire/PA Images

Morrisons has been granted permission to appeal to the Supreme Court after it was held vicariously liable for a major data breach.

In 2014 Andrew Skelton, an internal auditor at the supermarket’s headquarters, posted the names, addresses, bank account details, national insurance numbers and salaries of more than 100,000 employees online. At his criminal trial, he was jailed for eight years.

Data protection

Morrisons payroll breach: Could the supermarket have done more?

Data protection

In October 2018, the Court of Appeal upheld a previous High Court decision that the supermarket was vicariously liable for the breach. This meant that more than 5,500 claimants could proceed with claims for compensation against the supermarket, despite there being no proof of personal financial loss caused by the breach.

The Court of Appeal comprised three senior judges, including the Master of the Rolls, who refused the company permission to appeal to the Supreme Court at the time. However, Morrisons has applied directly to the Supreme Court, and this permission to appeal a second time has now been granted.

Nick McAleenan, partner and data privacy law specialist at JMW Solicitors, which represents the claimants, said he had every confidence that the Supreme Court decision will echo that of previous rulings.

He said: “While the decision to grant permission for a further appeal is of course disappointing for the claimants, we have every confidence that the right verdict will, once again, be reached – it cannot be right that there should be no legal recourse where employee information is handed in good faith to one of the largest companies in the UK and then leaked on such a large scale.

“This was a very serious data breach which affected more than 100,000 Morrisons employees – they were obliged to hand over sensitive personal and financial information and had every right to expect it to remain confidential. Instead, they were caused upset and distress by the copying and uploading of the information.”

The decision to hold Morrisons vicariously liable for the actions of a single employee caused some lawyers to question the decision by the Court of Appeal last year, with one calling the judgment “bewildering”. It is thought to have been the first class action case on a data leak in the UK.

Jo Faragher
Jo Faragher

Jo Faragher has been an employment and business journalist for 20 years. She regularly contributes to Personnel Today and writes features for a number of national business and membership magazines. She won the Willis Towers Watson HR journalist of the year award in 2015 and has been highly commended twice.

previous post
Academics forced to sign NDAs to cover up bullying and harassment allegations
next post
Investor votes down appointments in firms that lack gender diversity

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

You may also like

Queen’s Speech: Exclusivity contracts for low-paid workers to...

9 May 2022

Ikea France fined €1m for spying on staff

15 Jun 2021

Goldman Sachs orders staff to disclose vaccine status

11 Jun 2021

Rail staff falsely promised bonus in cyber security...

11 May 2021

Could a blockchain health record help HR handle...

15 Mar 2021

Employee surveillance: getting the balance right

22 Jan 2021

Ensure workers have right to privacy when work...

20 Jan 2021

Vaccination and data protection: What do employers need...

18 Dec 2020

Seven key employment law cases from 2020

17 Dec 2020

Uber sued for ‘automated’ dismissals

27 Oct 2020
  • Navigating the widening “Skills Confidence Gap” in 2022, and beyond PROMOTED | Cornerstone OnDemand conducted a global study...Read more
  • Apprenticeships are the solution to your recruitment problems PROMOTED | Apprenticeships have the pulling power...Read more
  • What it really means to be mentally fit PROMOTED | What is mental fitness...Read more
  • How music can help to ease anxiety at work PROMOTED | A lot has happened since March 2020, hasn’t it?...Read more
  • Why now is the time to plug the unhealthy gap PROMOTED | We’ve all heard the term ‘health is wealth’...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2022

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2022 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • Maternity & Paternity
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+