Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Age discriminationEmployment lawEquality, diversity and inclusionHR practiceDismissal

Opinion: Abolition timescale of default retirement age is too rushed

by Abigail Morris 19 Aug 2010
by Abigail Morris 19 Aug 2010

The timescale for the abolition of the default retirement age (DRA) is rushed and will hamper business during the economic recovery, argues Abigail Morris, employment policy adviser at the British Chambers of Commerce (BCC).

Next year is a crucial year for economic recovery. Our forecast for the UK economy predicts that unemployment will peak in the first quarter of 2011. If the regulatory environment does not support private sector job creation there is a risk that millions of young people and the long term unemployed in particular will be lost to the labour market forever.

Against this backdrop, it seems odd that 2011 was chosen by the previous Government as the year for several new employment regulations to be enacted. The introduction of the Agency Workers Directive, the introduction of Additional Paternity Leave Regulations and some provisions in the Equality Act will all add cost and time pressures to business.

The coalition Government has pledged to cut red tape affecting business, but seems to have inexplicably chosen 2011 as the year to abolish the Default Retirement Age (DRA).

Whichever side of the DRA fence you sit on – and the BCC is firmly against its abolition – it does appear that implementation is being carried out with unusual haste. The diagram below shows other major employment law changes, and indicates how much time business has had from consultation to implementation to prepare, plan and alter procedures.

Time between consultation and implementation of recent employment law

BCC analysis shows the average length of time between consultation and implementation of employment law is 17.2 months and the median is 16 months. The nine months for the default retirement age is very short, particularly for a piece of legislation which will affect all 1.3 million employers in the UK.

Many employers that removed their DRA before being required to by legislation took many years to do so successfully and mitigate the risks to the business – BT, for example, took six years to fully remove their compulsory retirement age.

The profile of the businesses that are most likely to use the DRA also gives weight to the argument that more time is necessary before its removal. The BCC Monthly Business Survey in February 2010 showed that businesses with between 50 and 249 employees were most likely to make use of the DRA. These medium sized businesses are vital for the UK economy to expand and create jobs for economic recovery to be assured.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Instead of spending time and money rushing through changes to their appraisal systems (or even creating one from scratch) and hurriedly consulting with staff on changes, these business should be concentrating on their core business activity. And they should be given the time to fully consider what the removal of the DRA means for their business.

The BCC wants employers to be given enough time to adequately comply with the abolition of the DRA, and mitigate the effect that it will have on their businesses. With the Government’s own Fair Treatment at Work report showing that only 1% of people aged over 60 feel discriminated against on the basis of age, this rush to legislate is unwarranted.

Abigail Morris

previous post
HR news round-up: HR stories making the headlines 19 August 2010
next post
World of Learning Conference & Exhibition 2010 preview

You may also like

Employers’ duty of care: keeping workers safe in...

27 Jun 2025

Progressive DEI policy is a red line for...

27 Jun 2025

When will the Employment Rights Bill become law?

26 Jun 2025

With HR absence rising, is your people team...

24 Jun 2025

Seven ways to prepare now for the Employment...

20 Jun 2025

BBC Breakfast bullying and misconduct allegations under investigation

20 Jun 2025

Finance professionals expect less emphasis on ESG and...

18 Jun 2025

Lack of role models a ‘barrier’ for people...

17 Jun 2025

Sleeping security officer wins £20k for unfair dismissal

16 Jun 2025

Pride 2025: why corporate allyship still matters

16 Jun 2025

  • Empowering working parents and productivity during the summer holidays SPONSORED | Businesses play a...Read more
  • AI is here. Your workforce should be ready. SPONSORED | From content creation...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+