Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

NHSDisciplineLatest NewsHR practiceWorkplace culture

Paterson inquiry: HR processes ‘stood in way of patient safety’

by Rob Moss 4 Feb 2020
by Rob Moss 4 Feb 2020 Disgraced surgeon Ian Paterson. Photo: Shutterstock
Disgraced surgeon Ian Paterson. Photo: Shutterstock

The confidential nature of HR processes in the NHS “stood in the way of patient safety”, according to the independent inquiry into the issues raised by the disgraced breast surgeon Ian Paterson.

The Bishop of Norwich the Rt Revd Graham James, who chaired the inquiry into how Paterson continued to perform botched and unnecessary surgery on hundreds of women, recommended that investigations into healthcare professional’s behaviour – including HR procedures – should result in suspension if there is “any perceived risk to patient safety”.

Many who gave evidence to the inquiry commented that HEFT investigated Paterson using HR processes, and this meant that he was guaranteed a duty of confidentiality which stood in the way of patient safety” – the Inquiry report

Furthermore, if the healthcare professional also works at another provider, whether in the NHS or in the private sector, any concerns about them should be communicated to that provider.

Paterson, who is serving a 20-year prison sentence, worked with cancer patients at Solihull Hospital, part of the Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust (HEFT) from 1998. He also practised as a surgeon in the independent sector such as Bupa Little Aston Hospital from 1993 and at the Bupa Parkway Hospital from 1998, which later became part of Spire Healthcare,

Paterson increasingly treated his private patients at Spire Parkway Hospital. There were concerns about Paterson’s clinical practice over many years, particularly his unapproved “cleavage-sparing” mastectomies, in which some breast tissue was left behind. This procedure meant cancer returned in many of his patients, while other women had unnecessary surgery.

Clinical colleagues first raised serious questions about his surgical procedures in 2003, but he was not suspended by HEFT or Spire until 2011.

In 2017, Paterson was convicted of 17 counts of wounding with intent and three counts of unlawful wounding relating to nine women and one man, whom he had treated as private patients between 1997 and 2011.

In his report, Bishop James said: “The suffering described; the callousness; the wickedness; the failures on the part of individuals and institutions as well as Paterson himself – these are vividly described in what patients told us.

“The scale of what happened, the length of time this malpractice went on; the terrible legacy for so many families; it is difficult to exaggerate the damage done, including to trust in medical organisations.”

The inquiry report said that “many who gave evidence to the inquiry commented that HEFT investigated Paterson using HR processes, and this meant that he was guaranteed a duty of confidentiality which stood in the way of patient safety, so patients being treated by Paterson were unaware that there were concerns about the safety of his operations.

“We believe this approach to have been a mistake, given that patient safety should have been the paramount consideration. We understand that, where concerns about a doctor’s practice arise, they can be managed by placing restrictions on what that doctor can or cannot do, or excluding them from practising altogether, pending the outcome of any investigation or HR process.

“In that way, ‘transparency’ with patients would not be an issue since the option of treatment – or a particular treatment – by the doctor in question would not arise.”

The report also had recommendation around corporate responsibility in the provate healthcare sector. “We heard that many patients treated at HEFT, and many treated at Spire, did not feel that the hospitals took responsibility for what had happened,” reads the report.

“In the NHS, consultants are employees and the NHS hospital is responsible for their management, and accepts liability when things go wrong. The situation is very different in the independent sector where most consultants are self-employed.

“Their engagement through practising privileges is an arrangement recognised by [Care Quality Commission]. However, this recognition does not appear to have resolved questions of hospitals’ or providers’ legal liability for the actions of consultants. We recommend that the government addresses, as a matter of urgency, this gap in responsibility and liability.”

David Hare, chief executive of the Independent Healthcare Providers Network said it would study the inquiry’s report carefully, and work with the wider healthcare sector to act on its recommendations.

“The independent sector has already taken important steps to help improve the way that healthcare settings communicate concerns about clinicians that work across multiple sites, and will consider the recommendations in the report to assess what more can be done.

“All parts of the healthcare system, including clinicians, providers and regulators across both the NHS and independent sector, must now work together to ensure that patient safety is prioritised in all healthcare settings – building on the progress made in recent years, so that patients can have full confidence in the behaviour of those that treat them.”

Niall Dickson, chief executive of the NHS Confederation, said: “We can see that both the NHS and independent sector are committed to work together and to share intelligence to make sure that patients are not let down by individual clinicians in this way again…

“This is a pivotal moment for patient safety and we all need to recognise the need for greater consistency in how information is shared so that everyone has a comprehensive understanding of the quality of clinical care that is being delivered.”

He added: “We also need to send the right signals at national and local level which help to create safe cultures throughout our healthcare system – this is still a work in progress and part of it is making sure that staff at all levels feel able to speak up and raise concerns. This is what patients expect and deserve.”

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Health minister Nadine Norris apologised on behalf of the government and the NHS, for what happened, not least that Paterson was able to practise unchecked for so long.

“I would also like to pay tribute to the bravery of all those former patients who came forward to tell their stories to the inquiry and whose anonymised accounts have been recorded in the report. I know this will make for difficult reading, as it highlights the human cost of our failure to detect and put a stop to Ian Paterson’s malpractice.”

Rob Moss

Rob Moss is a business journalist with more than 25 years' experience. He has been editor of Personnel Today since 2010. He joined the publication in 2006 as online editor of the award-winning website. Rob specialises in labour market economics, gender diversity and family-friendly working. He has hosted hundreds of webinar and podcasts. Before writing about HR and employment he ran news and feature desks on publications serving the global optical and eyewear market, the UK electrical industry, and energy markets in Asia and the Middle East.

previous post
One in three employees say their job is ‘low quality’
next post
Why empathy is the future workplace’s key to success

You may also like

NHS worker awarded £29k after Darth Vader comparison

8 May 2025

Whistleblowing protections do not extend to external job...

4 Apr 2025

Whistleblowing up as companies embrace ‘speak up’ culture

2 Apr 2025

Police sergeant’s ‘scattergun’ allegations dismissed by tribunal

17 Mar 2025

Police widen Countess of Chester manslaughter investigation to...

14 Mar 2025

New employment rights top priority for HR teams

10 Mar 2025

Court hears case on whistleblowing protections for external...

19 Feb 2025

Fall of Kabul whistleblower wins unfair dismissal case

19 Feb 2025

Countess of Chester NHS chair resigns after damning...

17 Feb 2025

Whistleblowing: Are there lessons to learn from the...

27 Dec 2024

  • 2025 Employee Communications Report PROMOTED | HR and leadership...Read more
  • The Majority of Employees Have Their Eyes on Their Next Move PROMOTED | A staggering 65%...Read more
  • Prioritising performance management: Strategies for success (webinar) WEBINAR | In today’s fast-paced...Read more
  • Self-Leadership: The Key to Successful Organisations PROMOTED | Eletive is helping businesses...Read more
  • Retaining Female Talent: Four Ways to Reduce Workplace Drop Out PROMOTED | International Women’s Day...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+