In a final monitoring and enforcement report, the Commission for Racial Equality (CRE) (which was replaced by the over-arching Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) on 1 October) recently announced that not a single government department was complying with its duty to promote equality of employment under the Race Relations Act.
Q I heard some government departments and agencies had been criticised by the CRE. What was it about?
A The race relations legislation includes ‘positive duties’ for public bodies to promote racial equality and harmony. This is sometimes referred to as the ‘race equality duty’. Public bodies are required to put in place a number of processes to help them meet these obligations. These include agreeing and implementing ‘race equality schemes’ under which the organisation is meant to scrutinise and monitor its policies and procedures on a rolling basis.
The item that seems to have captured the interest of the media is the fact that at its final meeting, the CRE reviewed compliance, and concluded that a number of public bodies were falling short of making good progress on these processes in respect of the race equality duty.
Q What did the CRE decide?
A Prior to its demise, the CRE had initiated enforcement action against seven government departments and agencies that had failed to make the required ‘returns’ to the CRE on the state of progress on their race equality schemes and the race equality duty. The CRE was also considering naming more departments and agencies which had failed to follow the correct processes. In addition, the CRE sent a clear message that this work should be re-prioritised by the EHRC.
Q What happens next?
A The EHRC will review the final report of the CRE and the handover work that the CRE has initiated. It will do the same for the other two ‘legacy commissions’ at the same time as deciding its priorities for its first year. The legacy commission can’t insist that the EHRC does things in any particular order, but it has committed to “building on the legacy of the old commissions” to “benefit some of the most disadvantaged and voiceless people in our society”. It will want to make sure that the things it makes a priority have the most impact on its mission to ensure that everyone has a fair chance to participate in society.
Q Was the CRE covered by the positive duty?
A Yes it was. Ironically, a recent report by the Public Interest Research Unit (reported in Personnel Today, 2 October) suggested that the CRE itself had not been able to meet some of its process duties, due to HR resource shortage. It is possible that a similar resourcing issue has impeded the compliance of other public bodies.
Q I have responsibility for equality and diversity issues in my organisation, which is a public body. What should I be doing on the race equality duty?
A First, get your processes right. The duty is essentially measured through process, rather than outcome, so make sure the actions you committed to in your race equality scheme several years ago are well in hand, and hopefully completed. You should also review your position action initiatives. In recent years, some of these have been found to be unlawful, because of an over-enthusiastic interpretation of what you are allowed to do. This is not only open to legal challenge, but can be counter-productive. You should prioritise what the organisation wants to achieve.
Q I have responsibility for equality and diversity issues in my organisation, which is not a public body. What should I be doing on the race equality duty?
A Nothing directly. The duty does not bind non-governmental bodies, however large and important, although many organisations want to get ahead of the game in having good robust diversity initiatives that are measurable and effective. You also need to be careful not to do anything that is unlawful under our current anti-discrimination rules. Organisations sometimes neglect small measures that can really help to ensure non-discrimination in favour of eye-catching initiatives that may not in fact deliver much in the way of change, so review your equality policies and recruitment and promotion practices. Fair and open processes with equal opportunities for all are much more likely to get support from across the whole spectrum of staff. They can also be readily defended if there is a legal challenge.
Poor HR leads to race claims from CRE staff
CRE starts legal proceedings against 15 government departments for failing to comply with race laws
