Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise

Equality, diversity and inclusionRetirement

Retirement guidance: weekly dilemma

by Personnel Today 27 Feb 2007
by Personnel Today 27 Feb 2007

I am going through the retirement procedure with an employee and have followed the required steps. I understand that I am not required to give a reason for refusing a request to continue working, but feel it would be a good idea to have something prepared. I would like guidance on what we can say.



If reasons can be given for refusing a request, it is advisable to give those reasons – not least to avoid the possibility of an adverse inference being drawn in relation to any subsequent proceedings brought under the Age Discrimination Regulations.


It is good practice in employee relations to have some objective justification for the refusal. For many employers, the reason to reject a request to continue working beyond retirement age will be on the grounds of health, welfare or safety of the employee (following occupational health guidance) or long-term training requirements of the job.


It may help employers, when providing reasons, to bear in mind the type of reasons held to be appropriate for refusing a request for flexible working. Most will not be directly applicable, but they do provide some level of guidance. Significant additional costs or planned structural changes may be two examples. If reasons are given, they must not indicate discrimination on other prohibited grounds, such as sex, race or disability.


Most employers must consider workforce planning when employees reach retirement age. Organisations must be able to manage workplace succession by planning for retirement and replacing staff. This may be easier if a retirement age is set out in a collective agreement.


On 15 February, the European Court of Justice held (in a Spanish case: Palacios v Cortefiel Servicios SA) that a collective agreement specifying a particular retirement age did not break EU law when backed by national law. This may prove fatal to ongoing challenges to national retirement ages.


Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.


By Clare Norriss, solicitor, Magrath & Co




Personnel Today

Personnel Today articles are written by an expert team of award-winning journalists who have been covering HR and L&D for many years. Some of our content is attributed to "Personnel Today" for a number of reasons, including: when numerous authors are associated with writing or editing a piece; or when the author is unknown (particularly for older articles).

previous post
Mona Lisa guards at Louvre art gallery in Paris to strike for more pay to compensate for stress
next post
Clare Chapman, NHS workforce director-general, says staff engagement is key to health service culture change

You may also like

Judge in Supreme Court ruling said he’d ‘take...

15 Sep 2025

How to steer EDI through a ‘permacrisis’

12 Sep 2025

Women less confident of achieving pay or leadership...

9 Sep 2025

Bigger budgets, but greater scrutiny – welcome to...

9 Sep 2025

EHRC submits new code of practice to government

5 Sep 2025

Decision to sack man for Michael Jackson noises...

29 Aug 2025

EHRC acts on policies flouting law on single-sex...

28 Aug 2025

Data bias means gender pay gap wider than...

26 Aug 2025

Council defends suggested alternatives to ‘husband’ and ‘wife’

21 Aug 2025

British Transport Police first force to hire part-time...

19 Aug 2025

  • Workplace health benefits need to be simplified SPONSORED | Long-term sickness...Read more
  • Work smart – stay well: Avoid unnecessary pain with centred ergonomics SPONSORED | If you often notice...Read more
  • Elevate your L&D strategy at the World of Learning 2025 SPONSORED | This October...Read more
  • How to employ a global workforce from the UK (webinar) WEBINAR | With an unpredictable...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits Live
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise