Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

BonusesPay & benefitsOpinion

Rewards for fairness: how much bonus is enough?

by Duncan Brown 23 Jan 2009
by Duncan Brown 23 Jan 2009

Market-driven and performance-related pay have dominated the reward agenda for the past 30 years. But in tough times, demands for fairness come to the fore – just ask Louis XVI.

Labour MP George Mudie wondered at the Treasury select committee inquiry into the banking crisis last month, “for all that we need incentives, why does a cleaner get 9% and the chief executive 150%? If there were some morality in it, we would not operate in this way”.

Minding the gap

While some see the current reaction against high pay as simple jealousy or a cyclical blip, HR functions need to be cognisant of this wider change in sentiment. “The public mood is shifting, the gap between rich and poor is too wide,” observes Guardian columnist Polly Toynbee in her new book Unjust Rewards. This fairness agenda has a number of dimensions.

First, there is the financial crisis and the role of banking incentives. Gordon Brown spoke of the need “to bring an end to rewards for failure”, French economy minister Christine Lagarde attacked “perverse pay structures (encouraging) greedy and blind behaviour”, and Luxembourg’s Jean Claude Junker blasted “the social scourge of excessive pay”.

Second, is this wider sense that executive pay remains out of control. Boardroom pay increases in 2008 fell back to under 6%, but this is still well ahead of average earnings. Since 1990, FTSE 100 chief executives’ pay has increased from 17 to 75 times that of the average employee.

In the US, Barack Obama is supporting legislation to give investors a so-called ‘say on pay’. The last Democratic party administration introduced a $1m cap on executive earnings.

Third, there is equal, or rather unequal, pay. The female-to-male earnings gap has more than halved since the Equal Pay Act in 1975 to 17%. Yet it remains at more than 40% for part-time workers and in sectors such as financial services. Recent Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) research found women at senior levels had lost ground over the prior year in half the occupations studied. The forthcoming Equalities Bill will increase the pressures on recalcitrant employers, with measures to improve pay transparency, and give wider powers to tribunals.

Finally, there is the growing body of evidence from researchers that UK employees display low levels of engagement by international standards. Dissatisfaction with pay and fair treatment is a key contributor to this.

Fair-pay strategy

So how can we achieve fairer pay in the UK?

The first step should be to develop a written reward strategy that asserts the importance of fair, non-discriminatory pay in your organisation. Of course, you need to reflect the external market and performance in pay, but fairness is just as important in engaging employees.

Follow this up by conducting an equal pay review. Start simple, by looking at gender pay gaps at different levels in your organisation, and then extend your investigation. A financial services company found female pay shortfalls originating in recruitment salaries and performance pay awards. They addressed this through training and introducing central monitoring of local rates.

Then train managers in fair treatment and reward, and be as open and honest as possible in your rewards communications.

Finally, nobody is saying that you should pay your chief executive the same as your cleaner. The Financial Services Authority (FSA) inquiry into City pay is directed at the rewards of traders and investment bankers, rather than executives. Pay scheme governance undoubtedly needs to be improved, and HR departments need to be suitably resourced to develop and control incentive arrangements.

Equal incentives

More generally, executive pay must be set in the context of the rest of the organisation, as well as the market. Investors are now much sharper in opposing pay ratcheting, which has seen the average FTSE board annual bonus opportunity triple to 150% of pay since 2002.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

But companies should also be applying their internal job evaluation systems to executives. And while bonus opportunities may differ, they might copy the example of one transport company, where if the general staff bonus plan doesn’t pay out, then executive incentives are cancelled.

As well as the FSA’s review criteria, remuneration committees might also address two further questions . First, do our executive arrangements need to be quite so complex and opaque? And, as we see employees in companies such as JCB accepting pay cuts to preserve the jobs of colleagues, they might also want to ask themselves, just how much is enough?

Duncan Brown

Dr Duncan Brown is a principal associate at the Institute for Employment Studies and an independent adviser and researcher on reward management issues. He has worked at major HR consultancies including Willis Towers Watson, Aon Hewitt and PwC, and research institutes, most recently heading up the employment consulting work at IES. He also spent five years as the assistant director general at the CIPD. His recent clients have included Shell, SGN, UK Research and Innovation, the UK Cabinet Office and NHS Employers, the UN, European Commission and Unicef.

previous post
HR jobs boost as recruiter predicts positive outlook for year ahead
next post
Know how to get value from your EAP

You may also like

Legislation could block bonuses at Thames Water

16 May 2025

Next to improve wage-setting transparency after shareholder pressure

16 May 2025

Culture, ‘micro-incivilities’ and invisible talent

14 May 2025

Rethinking talent: Who was never considered in the...

7 May 2025

Eight ways to best support grieving employees

6 May 2025

Ofgem workers ballot for strike action

2 May 2025

What will reward look like in 2035?

28 Apr 2025

Leading with honest feedback: A responsibility in recruitment

24 Apr 2025

NI increase has not caused ‘knee-jerk reaction’ in...

23 Apr 2025

Exploring the best London office locations for ‘Zillennials’

16 Apr 2025

  • 2025 Employee Communications Report PROMOTED | HR and leadership...Read more
  • The Majority of Employees Have Their Eyes on Their Next Move PROMOTED | A staggering 65%...Read more
  • Prioritising performance management: Strategies for success (webinar) WEBINAR | In today’s fast-paced...Read more
  • Self-Leadership: The Key to Successful Organisations PROMOTED | Eletive is helping businesses...Read more
  • Retaining Female Talent: Four Ways to Reduce Workplace Drop Out PROMOTED | International Women’s Day...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+