Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise

Latest NewsHR practiceRecruitment & retentionPre-employment screeningReferences

Royal Mail’s staff vetting procedures slammed

by dan thomas 13 Feb 2006
by dan thomas 13 Feb 2006


Royal Mail’s staff vetting procedures have been slammed as the service was handed a record £11.4m fine for failing to adequately prevent mail being lost, damaged or stolen.

Postal regulator Postcomm said Royal Mail was guilty of “serious breaches” of its licence in relation to mail security measures and staff vetting.

The regulator launched an investigation in 2004 after media reports claimed that some staff were tampering with mail.

Postcomm found that many Royal Mail agency staff were not properly vetted before being employed and this had compromised the safety of deliveries.

Postcomm said Royal Mail had made significant efforts to tackle the problem over the past nine months. However, it said the proposed fine of £11.3m reflected the “extent and seriousness” of the identified shortcomings, most of which could be put down to “management failings”.

Royal Mail said the fine was “unreasonable”, stressing that it had significantly tightened up its security procedures since 2004.

Gareth Osborne, managing director at the Recruitment & Employment Confederation, said: “Clearly anyone being brought in on a temporary or permanent basis to handle post should undergo a full background check.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

“Taking up full references and speaking to previous employers are the basic steps that any employer should take with a new permanent member of staff. No employer should rely solely on the content of an applicant’s CV or interview.”

 

Royal Mail
dan thomas

previous post
Junior doctors need nightshift naps
next post
MPs set to vote on smoking ban

You may also like

Security officer who showed ‘racist’ video wins £44k...

18 Aug 2025

CEO pay at record levels for third year...

18 Aug 2025

Scottish government faces legal action over gender policies

18 Aug 2025

More than 56k potential candidates for each HR...

18 Aug 2025

Alan Turing Institute faces toxic culture accusations

18 Aug 2025

4,000 jobs at risk as ministers decide not...

15 Aug 2025

Police Scotland constable who can’t work in cold...

15 Aug 2025

Lidl to increase entry-level hourly pay for 35,000...

15 Aug 2025

Job losses likely as Kingsmill announces deal to...

15 Aug 2025

AI in learning still ‘potential not reality’, according...

15 Aug 2025

  • Elevate your L&D strategy at the World of Learning 2025 SPONSORED | This October...Read more
  • How to employ a global workforce from the UK (webinar) WEBINAR | With an unpredictable...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise