Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Latest NewsHR practiceRecruitment & retentionPre-employment screeningReferences

Royal Mail’s staff vetting procedures slammed

by dan thomas 13 Feb 2006
by dan thomas 13 Feb 2006


Royal Mail’s staff vetting procedures have been slammed as the service was handed a record £11.4m fine for failing to adequately prevent mail being lost, damaged or stolen.

Postal regulator Postcomm said Royal Mail was guilty of “serious breaches” of its licence in relation to mail security measures and staff vetting.

The regulator launched an investigation in 2004 after media reports claimed that some staff were tampering with mail.

Postcomm found that many Royal Mail agency staff were not properly vetted before being employed and this had compromised the safety of deliveries.

Postcomm said Royal Mail had made significant efforts to tackle the problem over the past nine months. However, it said the proposed fine of £11.3m reflected the “extent and seriousness” of the identified shortcomings, most of which could be put down to “management failings”.

Royal Mail said the fine was “unreasonable”, stressing that it had significantly tightened up its security procedures since 2004.

Gareth Osborne, managing director at the Recruitment & Employment Confederation, said: “Clearly anyone being brought in on a temporary or permanent basis to handle post should undergo a full background check.

“Taking up full references and speaking to previous employers are the basic steps that any employer should take with a new permanent member of staff. No employer should rely solely on the content of an applicant’s CV or interview.”

 

Royal Mail
Avatar
dan thomas

previous post
Junior doctors need nightshift naps
next post
MPs set to vote on smoking ban

You may also like

Women at FTSE 100 firms won’t gain equality...

28 Sep 2023

Education doubts see UK sink in world talent...

28 Sep 2023

Prison officers lured by Border Force posts

28 Sep 2023

Royal Mail targets next generation of posties

28 Sep 2023

New chief people officer at TSB: Ariam Enraght-Moony

28 Sep 2023

Childcare costs rocket by £200 per week, claims...

28 Sep 2023

How HR should support managers of hybrid teams

28 Sep 2023

Is your talent management aligned for success? Exploring...

28 Sep 2023

Labour pledges small business menopause guidance

27 Sep 2023

Keeping up with global regulations foxes HR

27 Sep 2023

  • Discover the value of CIPD accreditation PROMOTED | See how the CIPD can increase your earning potential...Read more
  • What does it mean to be an HR professional in 2024? (survey) PROMOTED | The world of HR is changing rapidly...Read more
  • The Contractor Management Mastery Pack: Everything you need to manage and pay global contractors PROMOTED | Answers to cross-border...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2023

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2023 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+