Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise

Employment lawDismissalHR practice

Sacking by text message

by Personnel Today 6 Mar 2007
by Personnel Today 6 Mar 2007

I recently found out that one of my managers fired a member of staff by text message. We’re concerned about the legal implications of this following the recent high-profile case involving the dismissal of Cardiff shop worker, Katy Tanner, by text message. Is this form of dismissal legal?

The implementation of the statutory dismissal and disciplinary procedures in October 2004 set out minimum procedures that must be followed when dismissing any employee. However, if an employer fails to follow the procedure, the main recourse open to an employee is a claim for unfair dismissal. To claim this, an employee must have a minimum of 12 months’ service.

In the case of Katy Tanner, the company defended its actions by stating that the text message was only sent after repeated attempts to phone the employee. As it is a youth business whose staff are part of the youth culture, it believed it was justified in choosing this method of communication. Tanner had worked for her employer for less than 12 months, she had no remedy for her employer’s failure to follow the minimum procedures.

Before dismissing an employee, you should always bring the poor performance to the attention of the individual, and allow several attempts for the employee to improve before taking a decision to dismiss them.

Any dismissal should then follow the three-step statutory dismissal procedure set out in the Employment Act 2002.

In theory, this procedure should always be observed regardless of the employee’s length of service. In practice, the length of an employee’s service is often the deciding factor as to whether an employer will observe the minimum procedures.

If Tanner had been with the company for a year and her case been taken to a tribunal, her dismissal would have been found to be unfair and the employer’s arguments would have attracted little sympathy. While dismissal by text will be effective to terminate an employment relationship, it is poor practice and may give the employer a reputation for all the wrong reasons.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

By Daniel Wilde, head of employment at Dolmans Solicitors




 

Personnel Today

Personnel Today articles are written by an expert team of award-winning journalists who have been covering HR and L&D for many years. Some of our content is attributed to "Personnel Today" for a number of reasons, including: when numerous authors are associated with writing or editing a piece; or when the author is unknown (particularly for older articles).

previous post
Staff want pensions presentations to be easier to understand
next post
Northern Ireland: Is there still a big divide between Protestant and Catholic workers?

You may also like

Employment lawyers voice AI fears on tribunal claims

15 Sep 2025

Day one rights to make 86% more cautious...

14 Sep 2025

Employment Rights Bill U-turn unlikely, say legal experts

10 Sep 2025

Day one rights in the Employment Rights Bill...

10 Sep 2025

Bigger budgets, but greater scrutiny – welcome to...

9 Sep 2025

Personnel Today Awards 2025 shortlist: HR director of...

9 Sep 2025

Reshuffle sparks fears over Employment Rights Bill

8 Sep 2025

How to manage workplace investigations effectively

5 Sep 2025

‘Terrible’ Employment Rights Bill returns to Commons

4 Sep 2025

New ‘failure to prevent fraud’ law a ‘game-changer’

2 Sep 2025

  • Workplace health benefits need to be simplified SPONSORED | Long-term sickness...Read more
  • Work smart – stay well: Avoid unnecessary pain with centred ergonomics SPONSORED | If you often notice...Read more
  • Elevate your L&D strategy at the World of Learning 2025 SPONSORED | This October...Read more
  • How to employ a global workforce from the UK (webinar) WEBINAR | With an unpredictable...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits Live
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise