Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Latest News

Sex discrimination case gives older men new rights

by Personnel Today 28 Aug 2002
by Personnel Today 28 Aug 2002

A
landmark employment ruling is set to give workers aged over 65 the right to
claim for unfair dismissal and redundancy payments at an Employment Tribunal.

The
decision has implications for hundreds of thousands of workers and their
employers, according to the legal team who took the case – Charles Russell and Islington
Law Centre.

The civil
case against the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry centred on two
people – Mr John Rutherford, 71, from Rainham in Essex, who was represented by
Paul Quain of Charles Russell; and Samuel Bentley, 74, from Islington, London,
represented by Anna Corrigan of Islington Law Centre.

The
two men were dismissed from their jobs in the clothing industry for being over
65, but until this ruling, were not allowed, because of their age, to bring
their cases to an Employment Tribunal to claim compensation for unfair
dismissal or to claim for redundancy payment.

The
lawyers argued that there were far more working men over 65 compared to women,
and therefore the cut-off point at 65 years discriminated against men.

On 23
August, Stratford Employment Tribunal in London, which had initially heard the
case in June and July this year, ruled that the two men had suffered indirect
sexual discrimination.

Quain
said: “This is an extremely important decision, especially as people over 65
are an increasingly significant part of the working population, and the
Government is trying to promote older workers in the workforce.

“The
lack of protection against unfair dismissal and redundancy hits twice as many
men as it does women, as there are twice as many working men over 65 compared
to women.

“This
ruling, if upheld, will give people working beyond retirement age new
employment rights and protection already enjoyed by younger workers.

“This
case is also important in another way as it will provide some clarity in the
law on how groups of people should be measured in indirect discrimination cases.”

The
case could now be reviewed by the European Court of Justice. The European
directive banning age discrimination comes into force in 2006.

By
Quentin Reade

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

 

 

Personnel Today

Personnel Today articles are written by an expert team of award-winning journalists who have been covering HR and L&D for many years. Some of our content is attributed to "Personnel Today" for a number of reasons, including: when numerous authors are associated with writing or editing a piece; or when the author is unknown (particularly for older articles).

previous post
Agencies benefit from £40 million NHS windfall
next post
Disability charity’s £15,000 bill for sacking disabled worker

You may also like

Jobs on the line across NHS trusts in...

9 May 2025

Why fighting the DEI backlash is about PR...

9 May 2025

So what does the election of a new...

9 May 2025

Construction workers win compensation claim against defunct employer

9 May 2025

Rumours during recruitment: how should HR respond?

9 May 2025

UK-US deal saves ‘thousands’ of jobs in car...

9 May 2025

Teacher apprenticeship route to be tied to school...

9 May 2025

Zero-hours workers’ rights to be extended from beyond...

8 May 2025

NHS worker awarded £29k after Darth Vader comparison

8 May 2025

Senior execs at BlackRock to work in office...

8 May 2025

  • 2025 Employee Communications Report PROMOTED | HR and leadership...Read more
  • The Majority of Employees Have Their Eyes on Their Next Move PROMOTED | A staggering 65%...Read more
  • Prioritising performance management: Strategies for success (webinar) WEBINAR | In today’s fast-paced...Read more
  • Self-Leadership: The Key to Successful Organisations PROMOTED | Eletive is helping businesses...Read more
  • Retaining Female Talent: Four Ways to Reduce Workplace Drop Out PROMOTED | International Women’s Day...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+