Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Sexual harassmentBullying and harassmentEquality, diversity and inclusionLearning & development

Sexual harassment training would save a lot of hassle

by Personnel Today 23 Nov 2004
by Personnel Today 23 Nov 2004

President Bush’s re-election will no doubt please his fellow Republican Arnold Schwarzenegger, the governor of California. The muscled actor, with a string of 1980s blockbuster films to his name, is continuing California’s progressive employment law tradition. On 29 September, Schwarzenegger signed the Californian Sexual Harassment Training Law which requires employers with 50 or more employees to provide a minimum of two hours’ sexual harassment training and education to managers. This includes introductory training followed by training and education once every two years.

With the increase in sexual harassment and discrimination claims in the UK, there is a strong case for introducing a similar training requirement here as part of our extensive anti-discrimination legislation.

The argument becomes stronger if you look at the statistics. Sexual discrimination claims alone have increased by 41 per cent in the past two years. More than a quarter of all claims settled last year resulted in final payouts in excess of 10,000, with the maximum recorded claim in the past 12 months being 504,433.

These figures – from the ETS Annual Report, 2003-04 – do not account for the increasing number of cases which settle out of court, usually for high stakes and to avoid bad publicity, and often against banks. For instance, Morgan Stanley, Nomura and Merrill Lynch have all had substantial claims this year. The removal of the upper limits to compensation, as well as the domino effect of more high-powered women bringing claims to tribunal, are having obvious effects.

Tribunals are obliged to find that discrimination has occurred if the employee can prove that the employer has committed an act of discrimination, and the employer is unable to prove this is not the case. The employer faces the burden of proving that it did not commit a discriminatory act or is not to be treated as having committed that act.

The anti-discrimination laws all provide that any discriminatory act carried out by a person during the course of their employment is treated as being done by the employer. This is the case, whether or not the employer had any knowledge of the particular act in question and, as a result, an employer can be liable for one employee who harasses another.

It is a good defence to a complaint of harassment that the employer took reasonably practicable steps to prevent the employee from doing that or a similar act. Employers need to show that they have made a real effort to stamp out this kind of behaviour. The law then allows the employer to argue that even if the harassment occurred, it should not be attributed to the employer.

With this in mind, employment lawyers have long advocated that employers in the UK should introduce equal opportunity policies, which are backed up with sufficient training for their staff and that this training should be repeated at regular intervals.

Training staff to avoid harassment in the first place is crucial, but it is also becoming increasingly important for managers to learn how to handle complaints once discrimination has occurred. The new compulsory statutory grievance procedures will put even greater pressure on managers to handle these types of complaints correctly as employees are compelled to use their employers’ internal procedures before making a tribunal claim.

Surprisingly, given the risks and repeated advice from lawyers, the number of UK employers who introduce training on these issues seems to be low. There are undoubtedly many reputable employers who provide training, but how many of them repeat it regularly?

In California, the historic position was similar to ours in that its sex discrimination law allowed an employer to demonstrate that it took reasonable steps to ‘prevent and correct’ sexual harassment in the workplace or, that the victim unreasonably failed to use the preventative and corrective measures that had been provided and which would have prevented some if not all the harm suffered.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

However, the fact is that an optional defence does not seem to have encouraged enough UK and US employers to provide this training. It will therefore be interesting to see whether the Californian sexual harassment training law has a noticeable effect on the amount and success rate of claims brought. While some may complain about the ‘Nanny state’, mandatory training and education could prove cheaper for employers in the long run.

By Nicola Walker, partner, Hogan & Hartson


Personnel Today

Personnel Today articles are written by an expert team of award-winning journalists who have been covering HR and L&D for many years. Some of our content is attributed to "Personnel Today" for a number of reasons, including: when numerous authors are associated with writing or editing a piece; or when the author is unknown (particularly for older articles).

previous post
Offshoring improves business competitiveness
next post
As seen on screen

You may also like

Fewer workers would comply with a return-to-office mandate

21 May 2025

Redefining leadership: From competence to inclusion

21 May 2025

Consultation launched after Supreme Court ‘sex’ ruling

20 May 2025

Black security manager awarded £360k after decade of...

20 May 2025

EHRC bows to pressure and extends gender consultation

15 May 2025

Culture, ‘micro-incivilities’ and invisible talent

14 May 2025

Investing in skills when budgets are tight

12 May 2025

Why fighting the DEI backlash is about PR...

9 May 2025

So what does the election of a new...

9 May 2025

Rethinking talent: Who was never considered in the...

7 May 2025

  • 2025 Employee Communications Report PROMOTED | HR and leadership...Read more
  • The Majority of Employees Have Their Eyes on Their Next Move PROMOTED | A staggering 65%...Read more
  • Prioritising performance management: Strategies for success (webinar) WEBINAR | In today’s fast-paced...Read more
  • Self-Leadership: The Key to Successful Organisations PROMOTED | Eletive is helping businesses...Read more
  • Retaining Female Talent: Four Ways to Reduce Workplace Drop Out PROMOTED | International Women’s Day...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+