Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

HR practiceSickness absence

Sickness absence: Typical employee is off sick eight days a year…

by Mark Crail 17 Apr 2007
by Mark Crail 17 Apr 2007

Employee absence rates currently stand at eight working days or 3.5% of working time each year for a typical employer, according to a study by Personnel Today’s sister publication Employment Review.

The research shows that one-quarter of all employers lose two weeks or more to sickness for each employee every year, while at the other end of the spectrum, a further quarter lose less than one week.

The findings are based on a survey of 297 organisations across the public and private sectors. The combined total number of people employed by the respondents is more than one million.

In common with other surveys of employee absence, the research shows that public sector employers have higher absence figures than those in the manufacturing or private services industries.

It also reveals differences by organisation size: at the median, employers with fewer than 250 employees lose 5.7 days to sickness.

This climbs to eight days for those with 250 to 999 employees, and to 9.4 days for those with a workforce of 1,000 or more. On a geographical basis, absence rates are highest in the north-west of England (where the median is 8.5 days), and lowest in the South West (median 6.4 days).

But line managers hold key to improvement

Return-to-work interviews emerge from the Employment Review research as the most effective absence management tool.

Nearly one in five (19%) of those questioned singled out this relatively simple intervention as the measure that had contributed most to the success of their absence initiatives, ahead of efforts to target individuals with poor attendance records (13%).

Line manager involvement is also regarded as important, with 12% citing line manager training and 11% saying that line manager buy-in to absence initiatives make the single biggest impact.

Line manager buy-in is seen as particularly important in the public sector, where 18% of employers say it has the greatest impact of all initiatives – putting it ahead of all other options.

In contrast, manufacturers place greater emphasis on return-to-work interviews (27%), while private sector service firms are more likely to put their faith in attempts to target individuals with poor attendance records (18%).

Line manager involvement is also more important for larger organisations – ­especially those with 1,000 or more employees. Smaller employers say they concentrate their efforts on return-to-work initiatives and targeted interventions.

Financial penalties and the use of disciplinary sanctions against employees with poor attendance records are rarely regarded as especially effective, while still fewer employers – all large, public sector bodies – look to financial incentives to reward people with good attendance records.

And the rewards are worth having

Organisations that run specific initiatives to cut absence can typically expect to see the number of days lost to sickness fall by more than one-quarter (28%), the survey reveals.

By comparing absence rates before and after the launch of employer absence initiatives, the research found that employers could claw back more than two days’ absence every year for each employee.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Manufacturers claimed to be able to cut absence rates by 37.5% at the median, with public sector employers the least effective, cutting just 20% of absence. This translates into 2.8 days in manufacturing and 1.9 days in the public sector.

The research also shows that the larger the organisation, the less effective its absence initiatives tend to be.

Mark Crail

Mark Crail worked on XpertHR from 2001 until 2020, most recently as content director. He led the salary survey and HR data benchmarking services, overseeing the collection and publication of pay data through the Job Pricing tool and its wider HR research programme which forms the core of XpertHR Benchmarking.

previous post
Buncefield report finds flaws in training and advice for oil industry staff
next post
Pulling a sickie: CBI spells out the cost of ‘duvet’ days

You may also like

Top 10 HR questions June 2025: Redundancy consultation

2 Jul 2025

Welfare cuts would ‘undermine workforce inclusion and business...

27 Jun 2025

With HR absence rising, is your people team...

24 Jun 2025

Seven ways to prepare now for the Employment...

20 Jun 2025

Sickness absence falls to almost pre-pandemic rate

4 Jun 2025

Top 10 HR questions May 2025: Failure to...

2 Jun 2025

Charlie Mayfield: HR needs more proactive approach to...

29 May 2025

Number of Neet women rises but figures fall...

23 May 2025

Union rep teacher awarded £370k for unfair dismissal

15 May 2025

Period pain and absence harm women’s pay and...

13 May 2025

  • Empowering working parents and productivity during the summer holidays SPONSORED | Businesses play a...Read more
  • AI is here. Your workforce should be ready. SPONSORED | From content creation...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+