Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

BrexitGenderLatest NewsEqual payOutsourcing

EU-derived equal pay protections to be safeguarded

by Rob Moss 30 Aug 2023
by Rob Moss 30 Aug 2023 Anneliese Dodds described the government move on single-source equal pay protections as a U-turn.
PA Images / Alamy
Anneliese Dodds described the government move on single-source equal pay protections as a U-turn.
PA Images / Alamy

Equal pay protections that were to be revoked under the Retained EU Law Act are to be safeguarded with new legislation, in a move described by the Labour party as a U-turn by the government.

EU law enshrined the principle of equal pay for equal work for men and women so long as the terms and conditions of a job were attributable to a “single source”. But these protections would have been lost under legislation to scrap many EU laws, which received Royal Assent in June.

The EU’s “single source test” was one of hundreds of laws to be abolished by the end of the year under the Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Act 2023.

Angela Rayner, deputy Labour leader, had said the party would restore the equal pay protections. “Fifty years on from Barbara Castle’s Equal Pay Act, women are still fighting for equal pay for equal work,” she said. “The next Labour government will act to ensure equal pay claims cannot be unfairly blocked before they’ve even started.”

Equal pay

Birmingham City Council rocked by £760m in equal pay claims

Sainsbury’s loses bid to throw out equal pay claim

What does the European Court’s Tesco ruling mean?

Ministers last night pledged to preserve the right for women to receive equal pay to men for doing the same or similar job, even if they work in different locations or the work is outsourced to a separate company.

A spokesperson for the government’s Equality Hub, part of the Cabinet Office, said: “There will be absolutely no reduction in equal pay protections. New secondary legislation will be laid in Parliament long before the end of the year.”

Anneliese Dodds, the shadow women and equalities secretary, described the announcement as a U-turn, having come hours after Labour committed to keeping the “vital” equal pay rights.

“Women will wonder if the party that put these rights at risk can really be trusted to protect them,” she posted on X.

Dodds also said that Labour would create a specialist enforcement unit in the Equality and Human Rights Commission to work with employers and trade unions to monitor equal pay cases and stamp out unfair practices.

Audrey Williams, employment partner at Keystone Law, said the announcement “essentially confirms that the status quo will remain as set out in the current Equality Act legislation and, one assumes, the related case law. However, the status of case law from the European Court after exit day on the topic of single source (and other areas of employment law) is also complex.

“Equal pay claims are notoriously difficult to pursue (and defend) but reducing the protection would have been unwelcome when inequity in gender pay remains a problematic. While it remains a relatively underused provision, the single source argument has been an effective line of attack with claims brought in the public sector and, more recently, against employers with complex group structures in the private sector.

“For example, where there may be multiple subsidiaries, ultimately owned and controlled by the same parent which is the decision maker when it comes to pay and benefits.”

Henry Clinton-Davis, partner at law firm Arnold & Porter, said: “There is a lot of politics at play here, but there was not much doubt that equal pay laws, which have been so long entrenched, would seriously be removed – especially by a government facing an election in a year’s time.

“Despite the great fanfare when the government initially threatened to automatically revoke most EU laws retained after Brexit, in the HR space at least, very little is scheduled to change, beyond some potentially welcome tweaks to the Working Time Regulations and to TUPE.”

In 2021, a landmark equal pay ruling by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) found in favour of Tesco shop-floor workers, ruling that Tesco’s lower pay rates for their mostly female shop staff relative to their mostly male colleagues in depots breached EU legislation and the principle of equal pay.

The workers’ case hinged on the “single source” principle, whereby it could be shown that the inequality in pay was attributable to a single source, in this case, the board of Tesco.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

The ruling dismissed the retail giant’s argument that the EU principle defining equal pay for equal work or work of equal value was not applicable in this case. It also rejected its argument that the roles required “different skills and demands”.

HR roles in retail and wholesale on Personnel Today


Browse more HR roles in retail and wholesale

Rob Moss

Rob Moss is a business journalist with more than 25 years' experience. He has been editor of Personnel Today since 2010. He joined the publication in 2006 as online editor of the award-winning website. Rob specialises in labour market economics, gender diversity and family-friendly working. He has hosted hundreds of webinar and podcasts. Before writing about HR and employment he ran news and feature desks on publications serving the global optical and eyewear market, the UK electrical industry, and energy markets in Asia and the Middle East.

previous post
Is the future of hiring based on attitude over qualifications?
next post
Police forces ‘more likely to select white applicants’

You may also like

Eight new equality laws in the pipeline

10 Apr 2025

Barnet Council to face equal pay claim worth...

26 Mar 2025

Have group litigation claims advanced pay equality?

26 Mar 2025

Equality at work: ‘Men are out of touch’

28 Feb 2025

Asda workers advance to final stage in equal...

3 Feb 2025

Morrisons workers move forward in equal pay claim

17 Jan 2025

Birmingham City Council to settle 6,000 equal pay...

10 Dec 2024

Four BBC presenters launch equal pay appeal

29 Nov 2024

Disney agrees $43.3m gender pay settlement

27 Nov 2024

Employment Rights Bill: government outlines next steps for...

10 Oct 2024

  • 2025 Employee Communications Report PROMOTED | HR and leadership...Read more
  • The Majority of Employees Have Their Eyes on Their Next Move PROMOTED | A staggering 65%...Read more
  • Prioritising performance management: Strategies for success (webinar) WEBINAR | In today’s fast-paced...Read more
  • Self-Leadership: The Key to Successful Organisations PROMOTED | Eletive is helping businesses...Read more
  • Retaining Female Talent: Four Ways to Reduce Workplace Drop Out PROMOTED | International Women’s Day...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+