Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Latest NewsSelection interviewsTesting & assessment

Recruitment: how overconfidence can suppress social mobility

by Rob Moss 21 May 2019
by Rob Moss 21 May 2019 Shutterstock
Shutterstock

Confidence may be a welcome attribute in a job applicant but overconfidence, suggests new research, can drive inequalities, stifle social mobility and let a better candidate slip through the net.

Assessment and selection

Good practice: Shortlisting job candidates

Researchers in the US have found that people who identify as being of a higher social class are more likely to be overconfident.

Peter Belmi, assistant professor of leadership and organisational behaviour at University of Virginia Darden School of Business, along with colleagues from Stanford University, analysed the degree to which people from different social classes in Mexico overrated their performance in a memory test.

More than 150,000 people took part but they never received any feedback on how they did – they were only asked how they thought they had performed relative to others.

The research, published this week in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, found that across all measures of social class – for example their level of income and education – individuals with relatively high social class tended to be more overconfident compared with their lower class counterparts.

Another part of the research looked at recruitment interviews. The researchers invited 279 university students in the US to complete a survey that measured their personality, overconfidence, and demographic characteristics.

One week later, the students returned for a mock interview, where they had to role-play as a job applicant and give a speech on how they would handle a difficult situation. The researchers video recorded the interviews so that independent judges could evaluate each “applicant”.

The researchers predicted that compared with those with relatively low social class, students with higher social class were more overconfident. And this overconfidence, in turn, would help them appear more competent and ultimately more hireable in the eyes of independent evaluators.

“Our findings suggest that class-based inequality may also reproduce, in part, because class contexts can imbue advantaged individuals with an exaggerated belief that they are better than others,” wrote the authors. “And outside observers may conflate this miscalibrated confidence with evidence of competence.”

They added that, for organisations that are trying to be meritocratic, where there are equal opportunities for everyone, their findings suggest it is important to establish mechanisms that help identify individuals that possess true expertise.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

“Without such mechanisms, decision makers and gatekeepers may disproportionately reward individuals who already have an advantage because of their apparent competence, even though those individuals may not necessarily be the ones who would best serve a [organisation’s] interests,” they added.

Recruitment and resourcing opportunities on Personnel Today

Browse more recruitment and resourcing jobs

Rob Moss

Rob Moss is a business journalist with more than 25 years' experience. He has been editor of Personnel Today since 2010. He joined the publication in 2006 as online editor of the award-winning website. Rob specialises in labour market economics, gender diversity and family-friendly working. He has hosted hundreds of webinar and podcasts. Before writing about HR and employment he ran news and feature desks on publications serving the global optical and eyewear market, the UK electrical industry, and energy markets in Asia and the Middle East.

previous post
Npower discriminated against autistic worker
next post
MPs urge radical improvements in apprenticeships

You may also like

easyJet launches pilot recruitment campaign aimed at women

3 Apr 2024

Increasing use of skills assessments in hiring

6 Mar 2024

BMI and childhood broken bones causing Army recruitment...

19 Jan 2024

Use of AI in graduate hiring soars as...

14 Nov 2023

Is the future of hiring based on attitude...

30 Aug 2023

CIPD: Stop using degrees to screen candidates

3 Aug 2022

Young people’s skills don’t match employer needs, finds...

11 May 2022

Personnel Today Awards 2021: Norfolk County Council on...

16 Nov 2021

Unpaid work trials: legitimate recruitment practice or exploitation?

18 Aug 2021

Employers must be wary of laws surrounding automated...

28 Apr 2021

  • 2025 Employee Communications Report PROMOTED | HR and leadership...Read more
  • The Majority of Employees Have Their Eyes on Their Next Move PROMOTED | A staggering 65%...Read more
  • Prioritising performance management: Strategies for success (webinar) WEBINAR | In today’s fast-paced...Read more
  • Self-Leadership: The Key to Successful Organisations PROMOTED | Eletive is helping businesses...Read more
  • Retaining Female Talent: Four Ways to Reduce Workplace Drop Out PROMOTED | International Women’s Day...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+