Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • Maternity & Paternity
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • Maternity & Paternity
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Equality, diversity and inclusionBullying and harassmentOpinion

Stalking Act can be used by harassed employees

by Personnel Today 31 May 2005
by Personnel Today 31 May 2005

If an employee complained to their employer that they were being bullied, intimidated and harassed by their department manager, that employer might not expect to face a claim in the county court under legislation which was introduced in the 1990s to tackle stalkers. Yet this was the scenario faced recently by Guy’s & St Thomas’ NHS Trust.

The claim was brought by William Majrowski, a clinical audit manager at the trust. He said his manager was excessively critical of him, that she was very strict about his timekeeping and his work, isolated him by refusing to talk to him, and treated him differently and unfavourably compared to other staff. He said she was rude and abusive to him in front of other staff, and imposed unrealistic targets for his performance – threatening him with disciplinary action if he did not meet them.

Majrowski used section 3 of the Protection from Harassment Act 1997, saying that the manager’s conduct amounted to harassment in breach of the Act, and the trust, as her employer, was liable.

In the Central London Court, the judge struck the case out on the grounds that the Act was intended to protect people from harassment by individuals, not to create another level of employer’s liability, where employees are already adequately protected. However, the Court of Appeal disagreed in a majority decision. The appeal judges said that employers may be liable, under Section 3 of the Act, if their employees harassed third parties, including fellow employees, in the course of employment.

Under the Act, harassment may include “alarming the person or causing the person distress” on at least two occasions – conduct that can include speech. The Act provides a civil remedy for harassment, which goes further than common law in providing for damages for anxiety that falls short of injury to health. Also, the limitation period of three years which applies to personal injury actions does not apply. An employee has six years to bring such a claim.

An employee who believes that they have been bullied on more than one occasion by a manager can bring a straightforward harassment claim in the County Court. The advantage to the employee is that they have plenty of time to do this and need not pass the hurdles of a personal injury claim. Further, they do not need to have suffered a personal injury. The disadvantage, as with all County Court claims, is that a claimant would have a costs risk. Unlike employment tribunals, the principle is that the loser pays the winner’s costs. This may, in itself, be a deterrent for all but the most serious of claims.

Employers need to be aware that the behaviour of their managers could get them into hot water.

Paul Quain is on the management committee of the Employment Lawyers Association and is a managing associate at Linklaters

Steps to protect staff from harassment



  • Make company policy clear about not tolerating any form of harassment
  • Train managers regularly about how to spot harassment
  • Encourage early reporting
  • Open lines of communication. Make feedback easy
  • Investigate complaints early and act to prevent matters escalating
  • Set up proper support strategies to show the employer takes these issues seriously

Avatar
Personnel Today

previous post
HSBC says strike damage minimal
next post
More than half of workers feel burned out

You may also like

Policeman dubbed ‘Dolly Parton’ for working Nine to...

20 May 2022

Women in FTSE 350 leadership: ‘A lot of...

20 May 2022

City firms pledge to improve social mobility in...

20 May 2022

BNP Paribas banker accused of ’emotional terrorism’ wins...

19 May 2022

Ethnic diversity: report highlights disparities in school leadership

18 May 2022

Bald move: Tribunal was right in sex-related harassment...

17 May 2022

Police Scotland pays out £948,000 to female officer...

16 May 2022

Gender equality facing growing backlash from male managers

16 May 2022

Lack of flexibility pushes half of women to...

16 May 2022

Ethnicity pay gaps: Not making reporting mandatory is...

16 May 2022
  • Apprenticeships are the solution to your recruitment problems PROMOTED | Apprenticeships have the pulling power...Read more
  • What it really means to be mentally fit PROMOTED | What is mental fitness...Read more
  • How music can help to ease anxiety at work PROMOTED | A lot has happened since March 2020, hasn’t it?...Read more
  • Why now is the time to plug the unhealthy gap PROMOTED | We’ve all heard the term ‘health is wealth’...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2022

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2022 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • Maternity & Paternity
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+