Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • Maternity & Paternity
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • Maternity & Paternity
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Surveillance in the workplace

by Personnel Today 10 Jul 2001
by Personnel Today 10 Jul 2001

Businesses that routinely scrutinise staff behaviour by monitoring e-mails,
recording telephone conversations or planting secret cameras in the workplace
should be aware of a raft of legislation introduced since March 2000 that could
render some of these practices unlawful, and in the worst cases, attract
criminal liability.

The Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 (discussed in Letter of the
Law 14 November 2000) outlaws an employer’s interception of telephone calls and
e-mails unless the employer is authorised under the Act (or the accompanying
regulations) or where the sender and recipient consent to the interception.
Civil and criminal liabilities can result from a breach of this Act, which
covers all private and public telecommunication systems (and therefore not
surveillance by camera).

Human Rights

The Human Rights Act 1998, which incorporates the European Convention on
Human Rights, gives a "right to respect for private and family life, home
and correspondence". This provision is directly enforceable against public
employers, and will be considered in cases involving private businesses for
unfair dismissal or breach of the implied terms of trust and confidence. Case
law (most notably Halford v UK, 1997, IRLR 471, involving telephone tapping of
a senior female police officer) suggests employees have a reasonable
expectation of privacy in the workplace. Employers should make sure employees
know of, and ideally give their consent to, the monitoring or recording of
correspondence. A sound e-mail, Internet, surveillance and telephone policy
should be established.

Data Protection Act

Evidence collected from the interception of e-mails, telephone calls and
hidden cameras is likely to be "personal data" under the Data
Protection Act. The DPA also gives employees a right to see their personnel
files and any personal data held in a "relevant filing system", which
can include e-mail systems.

"Sensitive personal data" (such as film revealing an individual’s
ethnic origin or medical condition) generally requires the employee’s consent
before being used for any purposes (such as a disciplinary hearing). Film that
identifies individuals but does not contain sensitive personal data should be
used only in accordance with principles laid down in the DPA. Where an
employee’s consent cannot be obtained, the employer can use non-sensitive data
where this is necessary for its legitimate business interests. For example, an
employer may require cameras to enforce health and safety, prevent misconduct
or crime, or protect clients or the public. There is detailed guidance on the
Data Protection Commission’s website on use of CCTV (to which employers should
refer before installing cameras) and on using data and records in employment
relationships generally.

Avatar
Personnel Today

previous post
Employees unaware of their maternity and paternity rights
next post
Should I bother getting my CIPD qualification for a job in the City?

You may also like

Grants scheme set up to support women’s health...

16 May 2022

How music can help to ease anxiety at...

9 May 2022

OH will be key to navigating ‘second pandemic’...

14 Apr 2022

OH urged to be aware of abortion consultations...

8 Apr 2022

How coached eCBT is returning the workplace to...

8 Apr 2022

Why now is the time to plug the...

7 Apr 2022

Two-thirds of shift workers feel health affected by...

18 Mar 2022

TUC warns of April Covid risk assessment ‘confusion’

14 Mar 2022

Consultation on new NHS cancer standards, as waits...

11 Mar 2022

Pandemic pivot to home working fuelled mental ill...

11 Mar 2022
  • Apprenticeships are the solution to your recruitment problems PROMOTED | Apprenticeships have the pulling power...Read more
  • What it really means to be mentally fit PROMOTED | What is mental fitness...Read more
  • How music can help to ease anxiety at work PROMOTED | A lot has happened since March 2020, hasn’t it?...Read more
  • Why now is the time to plug the unhealthy gap PROMOTED | We’ve all heard the term ‘health is wealth’...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2022

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2022 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • Maternity & Paternity
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+