Ties are us rules judge in sex discrimination case

A
prison officer who claimed he suffered sexual discrimination because he had to
wear a tie to work has lost his case at an employment tribunal.

Mark
Caldicott brought the case against the Prison Service, but tribunal chairman
John Hollow ruled that while male and female officers were treated differently,
it was not discriminatory in this case.

In
his judgment he said: "We are not persuaded by the applicant’s argument.
We prefer the respondent’s view that in as far as a dress code reflects the
dress code of society that does not amount to discrimination."

Hollow
said conventional attitudes of society had changed and were constantly changing
in relation to these matters.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

Email(Required)

OptOut

From time to time, we will send you emails about selected products, events and services from Personnel Today and OHW+ - but you can choose to opt-out at any time. If you do not wish to receive these emails, please tick this box.

Comments

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Δ

He
added: "At one stage it would have been unthinkable for women to wear
trousers at work, let alone in a disciplined environment such as the Prison
Service. We do not find the dress regulations operated in a discriminatory
way."

By Quentin Reade