Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

EthnicityLatest NewsEquality, diversity and inclusionDiscipline and grievancesDismissal

Train conductor unfairly dismissed after ‘black privilege’ comment

by Ashleigh Webber 10 Aug 2022
by Ashleigh Webber 10 Aug 2022 The West Midlands Train conductor was dismissed for comments he made at home to his wife
Alex Daniels / Shutterstock.com
The West Midlands Train conductor was dismissed for comments he made at home to his wife
Alex Daniels / Shutterstock.com

A train conductor who was overheard making a comment about ‘black privilege’ to his wife while participating in an online training session was unfairly dismissed.

The Watford employment tribunal found that Mr Isherwood, who was a senior conductor manager for West Midlands Trains, was entitled to make the comments as they were made in the privacy of his own home, and should not have been deemed a sackable offence.

In January 2021, Isherwood attended a webinar on the subject of “white privilege”. He attended the webinar from home in his own time, having finished his shift earlier that day.

When the webinar concluded and participants were thanking the trainer, Isherwood had not realised he was still connected and his microphone unmuted when he said to his wife: “…do you know what I really wanted to ask, and I wish I had? Do they have black privilege in other countries? So, if you’re in Ghana…”

These remarks were part of a private conversation the claimant was having with his wife at home. He had no idea at the time that other people could hear him.

His line manager telephoned him later that day and suspended him from duty, pending an investigation.

Some of the webinar attendees emailed the course host to complain about what they had overheard Isherwood saying. Evidence provided to the tribunal showed that only three attendees out of around 30-40 logged on to the webinar raised concerns.

Following an investigation and disciplinary hearing in which he expressed his regret at making the remarks and for causing any upset, he was dismissed for gross misconduct, despite his “unblemished” disciplinary record.

Belief and opinion

How to handle controversial employee opinions

Maya Forstater wins belief discrimination case over gender-critical views

The letter confirming his dismissal said he had breached the company’s equality, diversity and inclusion policy and code of conduct.

The tribunal heard that there was no recognition by the company during the disciplinary process that the remarks made were made to his wife in the privacy of his own home.

West Midlands Trains accepted Isherwood was not racist, nor had he made any unlawful remarks.

In its judgment in Isherwood v West Midlands Trains, the employment tribunal noted that freedom of expression, including a qualified right to offend when expressing views and beliefs, is protected under the Human Rights Act 1998.

“It simply cannot be right that employees are not allowed to have views that they privately express about courses they attend, however odious or objectionable others might consider them to be if they come to know of those views,” employment judge Stephen Wyeth said.

“Whilst undoubtedly contentious, the remarks he expressed (albeit in an unguarded fashion because they were made to his wife) were akin to expressions of views not infrequently heard on radio and television or read in some newspapers. A significant section of society may of course disagree with those views, consider them narrow minded and may also take offence at them but undoubtedly there will be another section of society who hold a contrary view.

“However contentious or odious some might regard the claimant’s comments to be, the expression of his private view of the course to his wife in the confines of his own home was not blameworthy or culpable conduct that could amount to contributory conduct.”

The tribunal found that the process followed by the company before it dismissed the claimant had not been reasonable, and agreed with his claim that he had not been treated in the same way as other employees who were found to have been discriminatory in relation to race. It also found that the company did not consider alternative sanctions to dismissal.

It found he was unfairly dismissed, but noted that any compensation would be reduced by 15%, while his basic award reduced by 25%, because of his conduct.

A West Midlands Trains spokesperson said: “We respect the decision of the tribunal. West Midlands Trains is an inclusive employer and there is no place for discriminatory behaviour within the rail industry.”

The claimant was represented by the Free Speech Union. The union’s general secretary, Toby Young, said: “Too many employers think that saying something that woke activists deem to be ‘offensive’, even if it comes nowhere near to being unlawful, is grounds for dismissal. It isn’t, as the judge in this case has made clear. Forget about diversity training for employees. What we need is free speech training for employers”.

Diversity and inclusion opportunities on Personnel Today


Browse more Diversity and inclusion jobs

Ashleigh Webber
Ashleigh Webber

Ashleigh is editor of OHW+ and HR and wellbeing editor at Personnel Today. Ashleigh's areas of interest include employee health and wellbeing, equality and inclusion and skills development. She has hosted many webinars for Personnel Today, on topics including employee retention, financial wellbeing and menopause support. Prior to joining Personnel Today in 2018, she covered the road transport sector for Commercial Motor and Motor Transport magazines, touching on some of the employment and wellbeing issues experienced by those in road haulage.

previous post
Nurses set to vote on strike over pay
next post
Supporting non-binary and transgender staff: four key steps for employers

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

You may also like

Women at FTSE 100 firms won’t gain equality...

28 Sep 2023

Labour pledges small business menopause guidance

27 Sep 2023

Finance regulator consults on tougher conduct rules

25 Sep 2023

One in four over 50s working part-time

25 Sep 2023

Coalition of firms sets out to boost diversity...

21 Sep 2023

Gender pay gap could take 63 years to...

13 Sep 2023

Interview dress codes: Black candidates fear discrimination

5 Sep 2023

Police forces ‘more likely to select white applicants’

31 Aug 2023

Probation worker receives settlement after monkey chants

24 Aug 2023

New GMC guide spells out zero tolerance of...

23 Aug 2023

  • Discover the value of CIPD accreditation PROMOTED | See how the CIPD can increase your earning potential...Read more
  • What does it mean to be an HR professional in 2024? (survey) PROMOTED | The world of HR is changing rapidly...Read more
  • The Contractor Management Mastery Pack: Everything you need to manage and pay global contractors PROMOTED | Answers to cross-border...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2023

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2023 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+