Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Vexatious claimsCase lawEmployment tribunalsRace discriminationRecruitment & retention

Trainee barrister who brought 30 employment tribunal claims is disbarred

by Stephen Simpson 23 Oct 2015
by Stephen Simpson 23 Oct 2015

A trainee barrister who was banned from bringing employment tribunal cases after he lodged 30 cases in four years against various employers and recruitment companies has been disbarred.

Serial litigants and vexatious or hopeless tribunal claims

Unmeritorious claimant ordered to pay around £60,000 in costs

No race discrimination against African job applicant who submitted fake application with British name

Age discrimination: employment tribunal strikes out job applicant’s claims against eight schools

Mr Iteshi, who trained as a barrister, brought 30 employment tribunal claims in four years over a series of unsuccessful job applications for legal positions.

Employers that faced claims – mainly for race discrimination – included Transport for London, London Underground and the Bar Council, the association that represents barristers.

Mr Iteshi also brought claims against multiple recruitment agencies and public-sector employers, for vacancies for legal positions for which he was not recruited.

Many of the cases were struck out as having no reasonable prospect of success. However, this was not before many employers had submitted detailed responses to the claims.

The total cost to all the employers involved has been described as a “substantial six-figure sum”. One employer sought £17,000 in costs against Mr Iteshi.

Mr Iteshi was the subject of a rare restriction of proceedings order by the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) in Her Majesty’s Attorney General v Iteshi.

The order prevents him from bringing any further employment tribunal claims for an indefinite period, on the basis of his vexatious litigation.

In the restriction of proceedings hearing, Mr Iteshi did not endear himself to the EAT when he said in an affidavit that he had “encountered no single judge with any integrity in the employment tribunal system”.

He said that he wanted to “highlight the shamelessness of the crooked individuals hiding behind judicial immunity and their evil cloak of infallibility”.

He was subsequently called to a bar disciplinary tribunal, which resulted in his disbarment.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

In its decision of 16 October 2015 to disbar him, the disciplinary panel said that Mr Iteshi had “behaved in a way which was likely to diminish the trust and confidence which the public places in the legal profession” by “persistently and without any reasonable ground instituting vexatious proceedings”.

Mr Iteshi brought all his claims before the introduction of employment tribunal fees. Since 29 July 2013, claimants have had to pay a fee when submitting a tribunal claim.

Stephen Simpson

Stephen Simpson is Principal HR Strategy and Practice Editor at Brightmine. His areas of responsibility include the policies and documents and law reports. After obtaining a law degree and training to be a solicitor, he moved into publishing, initially with Butterworths. He joined Brightmine in its early days in 2001.

previous post
ROI for e-learning: Six tactics for success
next post
Zero hours contracts: redress for exclusivity breaches announced

You may also like

Restaurant tips should be included in holiday pay

21 May 2025

Consultation launched after Supreme Court ‘sex’ ruling

20 May 2025

Black security manager awarded £360k after decade of...

20 May 2025

Minister defends Employment Rights Bill at Acas conference

16 May 2025

Workers ‘wait and see’ as companies struggle to...

16 May 2025

CBI chair Soames accuses ministers of not listening...

16 May 2025

Union rep teacher awarded £370k for unfair dismissal

15 May 2025

EHRC bows to pressure and extends gender consultation

15 May 2025

Tribunal finds need for degree in redundancy selection...

14 May 2025

Contract cleaner loses EAT race discrimination appeal

14 May 2025

  • 2025 Employee Communications Report PROMOTED | HR and leadership...Read more
  • The Majority of Employees Have Their Eyes on Their Next Move PROMOTED | A staggering 65%...Read more
  • Prioritising performance management: Strategies for success (webinar) WEBINAR | In today’s fast-paced...Read more
  • Self-Leadership: The Key to Successful Organisations PROMOTED | Eletive is helping businesses...Read more
  • Retaining Female Talent: Four Ways to Reduce Workplace Drop Out PROMOTED | International Women’s Day...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+