Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

LondonGig economyLatest NewsCase law

Uber loses High Court bid to challenge worker rights ruling

by Zoe Wickens 7 Dec 2021
by Zoe Wickens 7 Dec 2021 Drivers protest outside Uber's London headquarters in October. Photo: Loredana Sangiuliano / Shutterstock
Drivers protest outside Uber's London headquarters in October. Photo: Loredana Sangiuliano / Shutterstock

The UK High Court has refused transport business Uber’s application to declare its gig-economy business model lawful following the Supreme Court’s ruling on its worker rights and transport regulation.

In February this year, the Supreme Court ruled against Uber and confirmed that its drivers were entitled to statutory protection under employment law.

The ruling stated that it must pay its drivers the national living wage from when drivers log into the app until the end of their shift on days that they are willing and able to work, as well as offering them at least 28 paid holiday days.

Despite this, the organisation sought a declaration from the High Court back in May that it is lawful for drivers to continue to contract directly with passengers for transport services. According to the App Drivers and Couriers Union (ADCU), the latest ruling means private hire drivers will have access to their rights since they will no longer be treated as independent contractors running their own businesses.

Yaseen Aslam, ADCU president and claimant in the Aslam v Uber case, called for the Mayor of London to order an urgent review to bring the industry into compliance.

Uber and its workforce

Supreme Court rules that Uber drivers are workers

Uber launches pension scheme for drivers

Uber recognises union for first time

“For years, the Mayor and Transport for London told us they had no powers to protect TfL licensed drivers from brutal exploitation by licensed operators like Uber. This ruling confirms that, not only had the powers all along but, in fact, they had the duty to act on these powers but failed to do so,” he said.

An Uber spokesman confirmed that the ruling means the details of the Supreme Court decision are now clear, and that every private hire operator in London should comply with the verdict in full.

“Drivers on Uber are guaranteed at least the national living wage, holiday pay and a pension plan but we’re not the only player in town. Other operators must also ensure drivers are treated fairly,” the spokesman said.

A TfL spokesperson said: “We note the High Court’s judgment that London private hire operators are required to enter into a contract with passengers. All operators will need to carefully consider the court’s judgment and take steps to ensure that they comply with it, including considering whether any changes to their way of working are required.

“We also note that the court dismissed an argument that private hire vehicles made available via the FREE NOW app unlawfully ply for hire.”

HR roles in the travel and transport on Personnel Today


Browse more HR roles in the travel and transport sector

Avatar
Zoe Wickens

Zoe Wickens is a journalist for Employee Benefits

previous post
Union loses legal challenge over PM’s decision in Priti Patel bullying case
next post
US company fires hundreds of staff over Zoom

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

You may also like

Uber has more drivers than ever as worker...

11 Aug 2022

Ministers release guidance to clarify UK employment status...

28 Jul 2022

Bolt drivers strike as union launches workers’ rights...

15 Jun 2022

Oxford study highlights best gig economy firms to...

9 Jun 2022

Deliveroo signs deal with union GMB to cover...

12 May 2022

Queen’s Speech: absence of employment bill leaves organisations...

10 May 2022

Union urges Uber to make pensions Sharia compliant

20 Apr 2022

Employment Bill could face further delay

4 Apr 2022

Zero-hours work ‘tightens grip of structural racism’ on...

9 Mar 2022

Pimlico Plumbers holiday pay ruling: four steps for...

9 Mar 2022
  • 6 reasons why work-based learning is better than traditional training PROMOTED | A recent Fortune/Deloitte survey found that 71% of CEOs are anticipating that this year’s biggest business disrupter...Read more
  • Strengthening Scotland’s public services through virtual recruiting PROMOTED | This website is Scotland's go-to place for job seekers looking to apply for roles in public services...Read more
  • What’s next for L&D? Enter Alchemist… PROMOTED | It’s time to turn off the tedious and get ready for interactive and immersive learning experiences...Read more
  • Simple mistakes are blighting the onboarding experience PROMOTED | The onboarding of new hires is a company’s best chance...Read more
  • Preventing Burnout: How can HR help key workers get the right help? PROMOTED | Workplace wellbeing may seem a distant memory...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2022

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2022 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+