Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Employee relationsEmployment lawTrade unionsRedundancy

Unions hit out at Cabinet Office for announcing ‘deal’ on redundancy scheme

by Daniel Thomas 8 Oct 2010
by Daniel Thomas 8 Oct 2010

The Government has been accused of jumping the gun after suggesting yesterday that five trade unions had agreed to accept its latest offer on changes to the civil service redundancy scheme.

Cabinet Office minister Francis Maude announced that the 18-month long negotiations over redundancy terms had concluded after five of the six civil service unions agreed a deal, which specified that the maximum payout should be 21 months’ salary. The Government had previously offered a cap of 15 months’ pay.

“Throughout this process we have been committed to reaching a negotiated settlement that is affordable and gives protection to lower paid civil servants,” Maude said. “These five unions – Prospect, FDA, Prison Officers’ Association (POA), Unite and GMB – have made great efforts during the talks to reach an agreement about a sustainable scheme, while securing the best deal for their members.

“There is, of course, one name missing from the list of unions, the PCS (Public and Commercial Services union),” Maude added. “I greatly appreciate the efforts of the five other unions whose constructive proposals have allowed us to reach these new terms. I very much regret that the PCS leadership has not been able to sign up to this provisional agreement at this time.”

However, POA general secretary Steve Gillan said he was “absolutely appalled” that Maude has stated that the POA have reached these new terms with four other unions.

“He is misleading Parliament and the general public by his outrageous claims,” Gillan said. “The National Executive Committee of the POA is not due to meet until next Tuesday and it will only then be decided on our approach and response.”

The POA said it is concerned that any ongoing discussions may have been deliberately “sabotaged” by the Cabinet Office.

Unite also made it clear there was no agreement, saying its officials will be telling its 22,000 members that the offer was the best that could be achieved through negotiation, but the terms would be worse than before.

The PCS, which has already won a High Court challenge to Labour Government plans to overhaul the redundancy scheme, said the new offer is still “unacceptable”.

PCS general secretary Mark Serwotka said: “We remain committed to reaching an agreement, but we will not be bullied into agreeing massive cuts in redundancy terms simply because the Government wants to lay waste to our members’ jobs and livelihoods more cheaply. PCS is not just one union out of six. We are the overwhelming voice of civil servants, with twice as many members as the other five unions combined.”

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

The Government intends that the new terms should supersede the current terms following the passing of the interim legislation (Superannuation Bill), which receives its third reading in Parliament on 13 October.








XpertHR FAQs on redundancy



  • How do the courts define redundancy?
  • What is the correct procedure for making redundancies?
  • Can a fixed-term contract be terminated before the end of the term if the post is redundant?
  • Is “last in, first out” still a valid redundancy selection criterion?
  • Can a fixed-term contract be terminated before the end of the term if the post is redundant?

Daniel Thomas

previous post
Workplace maintenance safety campaign launched
next post
HR jobs could be cut after Thomas Cook and Co-operative Travel merger

You may also like

Postmasters could take ownership of Post Office

14 Jul 2025

TUC launches inspections of workplaces for heat safety

13 Jul 2025

Ministers loosen fire and rehire proposals in Employment...

10 Jul 2025

Court of Appeal rules that Ryanair agency pilot...

9 Jul 2025

Doctors vote for return to strike action

8 Jul 2025

Employment Rights Bill set to ban employer NDAs

8 Jul 2025

Bereavement leave to extend to miscarriages before 24...

7 Jul 2025

Company director wins £15k after being told to...

4 Jul 2025

Microsoft to cut 9,000 jobs globally as role...

3 Jul 2025

How can HR prepare for changes to the...

3 Jul 2025

  • Empower and engage for the future: A revolution in talent development (webinar) WEBINAR | As organisations strive...Read more
  • Empowering working parents and productivity during the summer holidays SPONSORED | Businesses play a...Read more
  • AI is here. Your workforce should be ready. SPONSORED | From content creation...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+