Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Equality, diversity and inclusionDisability

Volunteers are not protected by the Disability Discrimination Act

by John Charlton 6 Nov 2009
by John Charlton 6 Nov 2009

The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has ruled that volunteers are not protected by the Disability Discrimination Act (DDA), as they are not covered by the specific term ‘occupation’.


Last week, the EAT handed down a ruling in the case of X v Mid Sussex, which had wound a tortuous path through the legal system. X was an HIV-infected volunteer with Mid Sussex Citizens Advice Bureau (CAB) who brought a claim for discrimination against that branch. She alleged she was discriminated against because of her HIV status.


The claimant was an unpaid specialist adviser for welfare rights and worked under a volunteer agreement.


The case started in 2007 at a pre-hearing Employment Tribunal review, where the judge found X had no contract with the CAB and therefore was unable to bring a claim.


Undeterred, she then went to the EAT, which ruled that her claim was rejected in the first instance because volunteers are not protected by disability discrimination legislation, principally the DDA.


X then appealed to the Court of Appeal (CoA) on the grounds that her work with the CAB came within the definition of ‘occupation’ under European equal treatment legislation. She argued that the DDA should be interpreted to include occupation, and to provide protection for volunteers.


The CoA heard the case earlier this year and referred it to the EAT, whose decision was released last week.


But the EAT found in favour of the CAB, holding that the term ‘occupation’ does not cover volunteers in the European equal treatment legislation.


Victoria Cook, solicitor at Bates Wells Braithwaite, who represented the CAB, said the judgment was in line with previous decisions that maintained that laws designed to protect employees did not apply equally to volunteers. She said the decision recognises “the unique relationship between charities and volunteers whereby volunteers give their often considerable time and effort to charitable organisations for free.”


Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This and other cases has prompted Volunteering England, the volunteering development agency, to announce it will run an inquiry into volunteers’ rights and responsibilities, which will begin on 18 November. Once the inquiry is over, early next year, the findings will be published and will shed light on the legal rights of volunteers.


[final paragraph edited 9 Nov 2009, 10:32am]

John Charlton

previous post
Direct Law and Personnel Director comments on NHS Stress Report
next post
Sick leave most prevalent in January and on Mondays

You may also like

One in eight senior NHS managers from black...

1 Jul 2025

Welfare cuts would ‘undermine workforce inclusion and business...

27 Jun 2025

Progressive DEI policy is a red line for...

27 Jun 2025

BBC Breakfast bullying and misconduct allegations under investigation

20 Jun 2025

Finance professionals expect less emphasis on ESG and...

18 Jun 2025

Lack of role models a ‘barrier’ for people...

17 Jun 2025

Pride 2025: why corporate allyship still matters

16 Jun 2025

HR is second ‘most sexist profession’ survey suggests

13 Jun 2025

Racism claims have tripled and ‘Equality Act is...

12 Jun 2025

Disability harassment and discrimination ‘shockingly high’

3 Jun 2025

  • Empowering working parents and productivity during the summer holidays SPONSORED | Businesses play a...Read more
  • AI is here. Your workforce should be ready. SPONSORED | From content creation...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+