Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Gig economyLatest NewsFreelance workersCase lawTrade unions

CitySprint loses third worker status case

by Rob Moss 5 Aug 2020
by Rob Moss 5 Aug 2020 Olaf Kruger / imageBROKER/REX/Shutterstock
Olaf Kruger / imageBROKER/REX/Shutterstock

The IWGB is calling on government to better enforce employment status laws after the union took CitySprint to tribunal three times for denying workers basic protections.

The Independent Workers’ Union of Great Britain (IWGB) claimed victory over CitySprint after arguing that five couriers were misclassified as independent contractors, rather than workers and are consequently entitled to holiday pay.

Gig economy and worker status

Supreme Court to make final Uber ruling

Hairdresser was an employee and not self-employed, finds tribunal

Matthew Taylor: Covid-19 increases temptation of non-compliance

Legal guide: determining employment status

In the 2017 judgment in Dewhurst v CitySprint, tribunal judge Joanna Wade called CitySprint’s contractual arrangements “contorted”, “indecipherable” and “window dressing”.

Despite that ruling, CitySprint issued new contracts but IWGB launched a second case in 2019 by successfully proving that, even on the altered contracts, the workers were entitled to TUPE protections.

This week the employment tribunal ruled that couriers were workers both prior to and after the change of contracts and therefore have a rightful claim to holiday pay during both periods. CitySprint’s financial liability will be established at a final hearing in October.

Phil Weber, one of the claimants, said: “So many gig economy courier companies wrongly classify their workforce as self-employed independent contractors. We all know they’re playing the system to deny basic rights like holiday pay and pension contributions but most workers are afraid to stand up for themselves because as it is, there’s not enough work to go around and so little job security, we’re left fighting for scraps. But when we are united and fight together, things can turn out very differently.”

Dr Jason Moyer-Lee, IWGB general secretary, said: “CitySprint and other gig economy companies are making a mockery of the British legal system. If the law were enforced and sanctions were real, CitySprint wouldn’t have dreamed of simply acting like it hadn’t already lost a tribunal claim over its couriers’ workers’ rights. In the absence of the state enforcing the law, the IWGB will continue to hold these cowboy companies to account.”

A spokesperson for CitySprint said: “We are naturally disappointed with this ruling, and will be reviewing this in detail before deciding whether to appeal.

“We strongly believe that this judgment, which relates to a small number of individuals and a period of time that occurred several years ago, does not reflect the positive relationship enjoyed by the vast majority of couriers.”

The IWGB said a separate £44,000 holiday pay claim is being made against eCourier on behalf of three couriers who were TUPE transferred from CitySprint.

The Supreme Court is currently deliberating over the employment status of Uber drivers in the UK, a judgment that will bring to an end to a saga that began in 2016. Uber BV and others v Aslam and others will establish whether or not the 45,000 drivers, mostly in London, are workers and entitled to the national minimum wage, holiday pay and paid rest breaks.

In 2016 an employment tribunal found in favour of the drivers in a case brought by the GMB union and law firm Leigh Day. In March, France became the latest country to agree that Uber drivers were not self employed.

Latest HR job opportunities on Personnel Today

Browse more human resources jobs

Rob Moss
Rob Moss

Rob Moss is a business journalist with more than 25 years' experience. He has been editor of Personnel Today since 2010. He joined the publication in 2006 as online editor of the award-winning website. Rob specialises in labour market economics, gender diversity and family-friendly working. He has hosted hundreds of webinar and podcasts. Before writing about HR and employment he ran news and feature desks on publications serving the global optical and eyewear market, the UK electrical industry, and energy markets in Asia and the Middle East.

previous post
Short-term executive pay cuts won’t solve high pay culture
next post
One in nine WH Smith staff face redundancy

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

You may also like

Platform workers legislation could drive Uber out of...

20 Sep 2023

Living Hours campaign reaches 100 signatories

23 Aug 2023

What the latest Uber case could mean for...

3 Jul 2023

Former cabinet minister blasts UK immigration policy

30 Jun 2023

In-depth: Are UK pay increases too large or...

29 Jun 2023

Half of gig workers earn below minimum wage

11 May 2023

Supreme Court hears Deliveroo collective bargaining case

25 Apr 2023

Covid: Care home staff worked extra hours for...

13 Apr 2023

Pay instability linked to insomnia, headaches and stomach...

6 Apr 2023

Just Eat to stop employing its own couriers

22 Mar 2023

  • Discover the value of CIPD accreditation PROMOTED | See how the CIPD can increase your earning potential...Read more
  • What does it mean to be an HR professional in 2024? (survey) PROMOTED | The world of HR is changing rapidly...Read more
  • The Contractor Management Mastery Pack: Everything you need to manage and pay global contractors PROMOTED | Answers to cross-border...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2023

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2023 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+