Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Employment lawData protectionDisciplineDismissal

Weekly dilemma: Careless employees

by Personnel Today 31 Aug 2011
by Personnel Today 31 Aug 2011

One of my employees has just sent the company’s entire salary list to all our staff. This has caused uproar among my workforce. I accept entirely that it was accidental, but I still want to dismiss him. Will that be legally fair?

One preliminary question first – did the employee have any prior history of such carelessness or any relevant disciplinary record? If so, the answer to your question is probably yes; if not, potentially no.

This may sound an odd conclusion given the damage that the disclosure could do to your company. You may have grievances brought by employees upset about the disclosure of their own salary, or, in fact, more upset about what the disclosure of others’ salaries says about their own remuneration in comparison. The Information Commissioner could properly conclude that this was not corporate compliance with the principles of the Data Protection Act 1998 relating to personal data. Your corporate reputation, both as employer of choice and as trustworthy custodian of client data, could take a significant knock.

Nonetheless, the employment tribunals have long been reluctant to allow the fair dismissal of employees with previous good records who have just made an innocent mistake, whether it is a fat-fingered trader misplacing a zero or a young solicitor inadvertently sending privileged advice to the other side. A fair dismissal on competence grounds for a first mistake will generally require the consequences of the error to be actually or potentially dangerous to life or limb on a significant scale – airline pilots, train drivers, etc – and “mere” financial or credibility loss is unlikely to qualify. This is particularly the case if the employee in question owns up to the error and is prepared to make an appropriate apology for it to all those affected.

It is entirely possible, in theory, for an employer to sue an employee for negligence and/or breach of contract when things like this happen. The argument runs that the employee is under an implied or express duty to carry out his role with reasonable care and skill, a duty that does not include the inadvertent but large-scale release of confidential information. Therefore, your employee is in breach of that duty that he owes you, and so technically exposed to legal action.

This may be very tempting, especially because you do not have to dismiss the employee in order to bring this sort of claim, but it is very rarely worth the effort. Your losses will be hard to quantify. To the extent that they arise out of previously concealed inequalities in your pay structure which are unlawful under the Equality Act 2010, a court would see your costs in addressing those discrepancies as your problem, rather than your employee’s. As a rule, the genuinely claimable losses arising out of an incident of this sort are either so great that the employee has no hope of meeting them, or so small that the claim is not worth the cost and potentially adverse PR inherent in bringing it.

You are, therefore, quite entitled to give your employee a suitable written disciplinary rocket and to mark your displeasure through any discretionary bonus arrangement, but a dismissal could well be found unfair. Even if it is understood that a sizeable contributory fault deduction might be made from the employee’s compensation were he or she dismissed unfairly, it may be best to write this one off to experience and hope that an appropriate degree of embarrassment leads your employee to try to make a new start elsewhere in the best interests of all concerned.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

David Whincup, Squire Sanders Hammonds, London








Get answers to more questions on disciplinary issues:



  • Will invoking the company disciplinary procedure be the best means of dealing with all instances of absence and poor performance?
  • Is there a set number of warnings that an employer must give an employee prior to dismissal?
  • What are an employer’s minimum obligations with regard to disciplinary rules and procedures?

Personnel Today

previous post
Half of workers unaware of pension auto-enrolment reforms
next post
HR Development in the 21st century

You may also like

Minister defends Employment Rights Bill at Acas conference

16 May 2025

CBI chair Soames accuses ministers of not listening...

16 May 2025

EHRC bows to pressure and extends gender consultation

15 May 2025

‘Polygamous working’ is a minefield for HR

14 May 2025

Contract cleaner loses EAT race discrimination appeal

14 May 2025

Construction workers win compensation claim against defunct employer

9 May 2025

Zero-hours workers’ rights to be extended from beyond...

8 May 2025

Employment tribunal backlog up 23% in a year

7 May 2025

Ministers urged to outlaw misuse of NDAs

7 May 2025

M&S pauses hiring as it deals with cyber...

2 May 2025

  • 2025 Employee Communications Report PROMOTED | HR and leadership...Read more
  • The Majority of Employees Have Their Eyes on Their Next Move PROMOTED | A staggering 65%...Read more
  • Prioritising performance management: Strategies for success (webinar) WEBINAR | In today’s fast-paced...Read more
  • Self-Leadership: The Key to Successful Organisations PROMOTED | Eletive is helping businesses...Read more
  • Retaining Female Talent: Four Ways to Reduce Workplace Drop Out PROMOTED | International Women’s Day...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+