Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

HR practiceSickness absence

Why is public sector sickness absence worse than the private sector?

by Ross Bentley 29 Nov 2005
by Ross Bentley 29 Nov 2005

Official government data, published last week, showed that staff sickness in the civil service cost the taxpayer £400m in 2004 with an average of 9.1 working days lost per member of staff, compared with 10 in 2003.


Across Whitehall, the Cabinet Office was the best-performing department with just 3.6 working days lost while Revenue & Customs had the worst record for staff sickness absence, with 12 days lost.


“There are still pockets in the civil service where absence levels are too high,” said Ben Willmott, employee relations adviser at the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (CIPD), who says public sector absence levels compare unfavourably with the private sector, calculated to stand at 6.7 days lost, according to the CIPD.


At the Health and Safety Executive, Mark Dempsey has been studying the issue for more than a year.


He is secretary to a ministerial taskforce into health, safety and productivity headed by Lord Hunt at the Department for Work and Pensions, and involving representatives from a wide range of public sector organisations including the Treasury and the NHS.


The taskforce has identified some key areas where absenteeism in the public sector can be tackled.


Dempsey believes to effectively confront the problem of absenteeism, it is vital there is commitment from top-level managers. Unless this is achieved, nothing serious can ever be done about absenteeism levels that may, in part, be the result of an entrenched workplace culture.


Instilling good management practice throughout government departments is also vital in reducing absence levels. A good manager, said Dempsey, will create an atmosphere where staff are less likely to want to stay away.


“They should motivate staff, make them feel valued, support people when they are off and be able to approach difficult conversations in the right way,” he said.


There is also a need, according to Dempsey, for government departments to have better systems in place to collect and measure absence data, so that patterns of behaviour and problems with both individuals and managers can be identified as early as possible.


This point is picked up by Sarah Brown, a senior associate at Mercer HR Consulting’s health and benefits unit, who says studies of long-term absence situations show staff start to lose engagement with organisations after having been off work for three weeks.


This means organisations must intervene as early as possible to offer support and advice to absent staff, she said. These interventions are especially important when employees are absent because of musculoskeletal disorders and stress, complaints that tend to reoccur, said Brown.


She advises in these cases that staff are put in contact with occupational health functions at an early stage.


“By acting early, long-term absenteeism can be lessened, as can the expense and emotional impact related to the problem,” she said.


Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

In this instance, public sector organisations can learn from the private sector, said Willmott, who cites the Royal Mail as an example.


The organisation’s well-publicised success in cutting absence levels was attributed to a number of initiatives including reducing the time before absent staff were referred to occupational health from three weeks to two while stress and muscular injuries are now referred on day one.

Ross Bentley

previous post
Directors group slams plans to abolish OFR rules
next post
Companies feel weight of pensions responsibility

You may also like

‘Replace sick notes with gym’, Streeting tells GPs

11 Jul 2025

Top 10 HR questions June 2025: Redundancy consultation

2 Jul 2025

Welfare cuts would ‘undermine workforce inclusion and business...

27 Jun 2025

With HR absence rising, is your people team...

24 Jun 2025

Seven ways to prepare now for the Employment...

20 Jun 2025

Sickness absence falls to almost pre-pandemic rate

4 Jun 2025

Top 10 HR questions May 2025: Failure to...

2 Jun 2025

Charlie Mayfield: HR needs more proactive approach to...

29 May 2025

Number of Neet women rises but figures fall...

23 May 2025

Union rep teacher awarded £370k for unfair dismissal

15 May 2025

  • Empower and engage for the future: A revolution in talent development (webinar) WEBINAR | As organisations strive...Read more
  • Empowering working parents and productivity during the summer holidays SPONSORED | Businesses play a...Read more
  • AI is here. Your workforce should be ready. SPONSORED | From content creation...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+