Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Corporate governanceEmployment lawHR strategy

Will the SFO up its game on overseas corruption?

by Personnel Today 15 Dec 2009
by Personnel Today 15 Dec 2009

After criticism of the Serious Fraud Office’s (SFO) failure to bring any cases of overseas corruption, the past couple of months have seen its successful prosecution of bridge-builder Mabey & Johnson for corruption in Jamaica and Ghana, and its stated intention to seek the Attorney-General’s consent to prosecute British Aerospace.

This seems to signal a new determination at the SFO to prosecute these offences, but no doubt these cases will also be used by the SFO to demonstrate the full consequences of criminal investigation and prosecution, in contrast to the civil outcome it states that it wishes to reach in cases where companies bring overseas corruption problems voluntarily to its attention.

In July the SFO issued a guide, Approach to Dealing with Overseas Corruption, which seeks to encourage companies with an overseas corruption problem to self-report. It states that “we want to settle self-referral cases… civilly wherever possible”. The possibility of a company apparently being able to avoid criminal proceedings by reaching a civil settlement with the SFO is controversial, but is this, in fact, what the SFO is offering?

Where a firm has corruptly obtained a contract, it is liable to civil proceedings under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 to recover the proceeds. The SFO has to date only dealt with one case of any type on this basis (Balfour Beatty, which related to payment irregularities in an overseas subsidiary), but the guide is clear evidence of the intention of the SFO to deal with more cases in this way.

There are doubtless advantages to a firm if it can deal with a corruption issue on a civil, as opposed to a criminal, basis. The guide identifies such benefits as avoiding the full rigours of a criminal investigation, prosecution, conviction and confiscation, and avoiding the mandatory debarment provisions under the EU Public Procurement Directive that would follow conviction. However, whether the civil process is in fact an alternative to the criminal process will depend on whether the company ever ran the risk of prosecution in the first place.

It is well-established that a firm will only bear criminal liability if one or more of its “guiding minds” (normally a director) has personal criminal liability. Thus a company can only be convicted of corruption if the prosecutor is able to establish the guilt of somebody sufficiently senior within the organisation to be regarded as a guiding mind.

Is the SFO offering the prospect of a civil outcome in these circumstances? It would appear not. The SFO identifies the situation where “board members of the corporate had engaged personally in the corrupt activities, particularly if they had derived personal benefit” as one of the exceptions to its desire to settle self-referral cases civilly.

Even if a firm self-reports and is dealt with on a civil basis, it does not follow that individuals will escape prosecution. The SFO states that there are no guarantees, but there is no inconsistency in this. Individuals involved in corruption will always be vulnerable to prosecution, whereas the vulnerability of a company will depend on the seniority of the individual concerned, although in deciding to self-report, a firm may seem to be hanging individuals out to dry.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

It is clear from the outcome of the Mabey & Johnson case that in future the SFO will act as both prosecutor and regulator to help produce a new corporate culture and bring about behavioural change.

Richard Sallybanks, partner, BCL Burton Copeland

Personnel Today

Personnel Today articles are written by an expert team of award-winning journalists who have been covering HR and L&D for many years. Some of our content is attributed to "Personnel Today" for a number of reasons, including: when numerous authors are associated with writing or editing a piece; or when the author is unknown (particularly for older articles).

previous post
MoD to cut jobs to fund war in Afghanistan
next post
European Commission legal threat will accelerate passage of Equality Bill

You may also like

Fire and rehire: the relocation question

22 May 2025

Minister defends Employment Rights Bill at Acas conference

16 May 2025

CBI chair Soames accuses ministers of not listening...

16 May 2025

EHRC bows to pressure and extends gender consultation

15 May 2025

Contract cleaner loses EAT race discrimination appeal

14 May 2025

University of Salford launches Better Working Lives cluster

14 May 2025

Why HR burnout is a strategic issue

12 May 2025

Construction workers win compensation claim against defunct employer

9 May 2025

Zero-hours workers’ rights to be extended from beyond...

8 May 2025

Employment tribunal backlog up 23% in a year

7 May 2025

  • 2025 Employee Communications Report PROMOTED | HR and leadership...Read more
  • The Majority of Employees Have Their Eyes on Their Next Move PROMOTED | A staggering 65%...Read more
  • Prioritising performance management: Strategies for success (webinar) WEBINAR | In today’s fast-paced...Read more
  • Self-Leadership: The Key to Successful Organisations PROMOTED | Eletive is helping businesses...Read more
  • Retaining Female Talent: Four Ways to Reduce Workplace Drop Out PROMOTED | International Women’s Day...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+