Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Equality, diversity and inclusionDisability

Physiotherapists fight for disabled workers’ funds

by Personnel Today 22 Sep 2008
by Personnel Today 22 Sep 2008

Physiotherapists are today urging Government to reconsider plans to remove public sector funding from the Access to Work scheme.

Access to Work currently makes it possible for many disabled people to gain or remain in employment, and removing it for public sector employees potentially puts thousands of workers at a disadvantage.
 
The Chartered Society of Physiotherapy (CSP) is calling on TUC Congress in Brighton to put pressure on the Department for Work and Pensions not to remove AtW funding from the public sector in favour of the private sector.
 
For nearly 15 years, the Government-funded Access to Work scheme has provided vital support to disabled workers and their employers.

It has greatly improved employment opportunities for many people with disabilities – 24,000 in the year 2006/7 alone – reducing inequalities in the workplace by meeting the costs of extra equipment and assistance (see note 3).
 
However, these new proposals would leave public sector employers to fund additional support from their general budgets rather than AtW funding, and leave thousands of disabled employees facing inconvenience and possible discrimination.
 
Physiotherapists play a key role in helping people with health problems or disabilities to remain in or return to work.

The CSP is arguing that without access to central funding disabled people, as well as the CSP’s own disabled members, will be left to go “cap in hand” to employers for provision of reasonable adjustments and support.
 
The withdrawal of public service funds will also mean that budgets currently earmarked for items such as medical supplies and school textbooks will be used to pay for the extra support needed by disabled workers.
 
Chartered physiotherapist and shop steward Cliff Towson, who is proposing the motion to Congress, said:

“There’s an incorrect perception among some employers that the additional support needed by many disabled workers will be expensive. This is why the funding from the Access to Work scheme is so powerful in helping people with disabilities into employment and keeping them there.
 
“Even though the Government recently announced plans to double the funding for Access to Work by 2014, there’s no commitment from them to provide additional investment to public sector budgets. This would see huge numbers of disabled workers put at a massive disadvantage.
 
“These proposals cannot be allowed to expand throughout the public sector. We urge the Government to look seriously at the impact their plans will have on disabled workers, and to expand Access to Work throughout both the private and public sectors, not withdraw it.

“Otherwise we will see a real backward step for people with disabilities and it can only harm their employment prospects for the future.”
 
A pilot of the public sector funding withdrawal has already been carried out within Ministerial Government Departments.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

The trade unions affected by the pilot have reported to the TUC that disabled workers were being put off of asking for help and assistance.

Union reps have also found it harder to argue for the recruitment and retention of disabled employees without a ringfenced fund for their support, and are now convinced that the non-availability of AtW funding leads to discrimination against potential or existing disabled staff. 

Personnel Today

Personnel Today articles are written by an expert team of award-winning journalists who have been covering HR and L&D for many years. Some of our content is attributed to "Personnel Today" for a number of reasons, including: when numerous authors are associated with writing or editing a piece; or when the author is unknown (particularly for older articles).

previous post
Communications professionals on the move
next post
Redundancy Assist launches as a division of People Partners Associates

You may also like

One in eight senior NHS managers from black...

1 Jul 2025

Welfare cuts would ‘undermine workforce inclusion and business...

27 Jun 2025

Progressive DEI policy is a red line for...

27 Jun 2025

BBC Breakfast bullying and misconduct allegations under investigation

20 Jun 2025

Finance professionals expect less emphasis on ESG and...

18 Jun 2025

Lack of role models a ‘barrier’ for people...

17 Jun 2025

Pride 2025: why corporate allyship still matters

16 Jun 2025

HR is second ‘most sexist profession’ survey suggests

13 Jun 2025

Racism claims have tripled and ‘Equality Act is...

12 Jun 2025

Disability harassment and discrimination ‘shockingly high’

3 Jun 2025

  • Empowering working parents and productivity during the summer holidays SPONSORED | Businesses play a...Read more
  • AI is here. Your workforce should be ready. SPONSORED | From content creation...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+