Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Legal Q & A: Age discrimination

by Personnel Today 22 Jul 2003
by Personnel Today 22 Jul 2003

By Richard Linskell, partner, Dawsons Solicitors

Q Why is the Government proposing to introduce age legislation?

A Age discrimination has been a hot topic for some time. The
Government is committed to introducing legislation outlawing age discrimination
under the European Employment Framework Directive. This is also set against the
background of the Government’s need to deal with the ageing workforce and the
‘pensions timebomb’.

Q What is age discrimination and whom does it affect?

A The proposals, due to commence on 1 October 2006, will outlaw
direct and indirect age discrimination. Direct discrimination occurs when a
decision is made on the basis of a person’s actual or perceived age. Indirect
discrimination occurs when a policy or practice applies to everyone, but
disadvantages certain groups (that is, younger or older people) unless there
are justifiable reasons. The legislation will apply to employers, providers of
vocational training and trade unions, professional associations and employers’
organisations.

Q What are the main proposals?

A The key proposals are:

– Compulsory retirement ages will be outlawed unless they are justified. The
Government is consulting on whether employers should be able to justify
mandatory retirement ages in exceptional cases, and whether there should be a
default retirement age of 70, after which no justification would be required.
There will be no upper age limit on the right to claim unfair dismissal

– Decisions on recruitment, selection and promotion based on age, including
applying an age limit on recruitment, will be unlawful unless they can be
justified

– Employers can continue to provide pay and non-pay benefits based on length
of service or experience, if it is justifiable

In the calculation of the basic award for unfair dismissal and the statutory
redundancy payment, age would cease to be a factor, although 20 years’ service
would continue to be the maximum that could be taken into account. The
Government is currently consulting on when the right to a redundancy payment
should cease.

Q On what basis will using age as a factor be justified?

A The Government is proposing specific aims for the legislation which
would be used in determining whether discrimination is justified. Those aims
are:

– Health, welfare and safety – for example, the protection of younger staff

– Facilitation of employment planning – for example, where the business has
a number of people approaching retirement age at the same time

– The particular training requirement of the post in question. As an
example, the Government cites air traffic controllers, who need high levels of
health, fitness and concentration, and need to undergo extensive training in
their posts

– The need for a reasonable period of employment before retirement

Q What will be the impact of this legislation?

A It will have a profound impact on every decision made by employers.
They will need to consider whether any decision related to employment adversely
affects one age group or another. Employers and their legal advisers will need
to second guess what an employment tribunal might consider to be justifiable.

Q What will be the impact on recruitment practices?

A Although recruiting within particular age bands will not be
outlawed, employers will need to think carefully about whether it is
justifiable. For example, on graduate recruitment programmes, it is unlikely to
be justifiable to limit them to people below a certain age when there may be
significant numbers of mature graduates.

Employment tribunals will not be too impressed with employers who limit
recruitment to those under 25 years of age because they have a young team, for
instance, or to those over 35, say, because they want mature employees. Each
application would have to be justified on its own merits.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Q Am I able to make any comments on the proposals?

A The consultation lasts until 20 October 2003. The consultation
documents are on the DTI’s website at http://www.dti.gov.uk/er/equality/age.htm

Personnel Today

Personnel Today articles are written by an expert team of award-winning journalists who have been covering HR and L&D for many years. Some of our content is attributed to "Personnel Today" for a number of reasons, including: when numerous authors are associated with writing or editing a piece; or when the author is unknown (particularly for older articles).

previous post
Gender pay gap correlates to motherhood
next post
BBC invests in leader training to boost creativity

You may also like

Dallas Cowboy Cheerleaders receive 400% pay rise

4 Jul 2025

FCA to extend misconduct rules beyond banks

2 Jul 2025

‘Decisive action’ needed to boost workers’ pensions

2 Jul 2025

Business leaders’ drop in confidence impacts headcount

2 Jul 2025

Why we need to rethink soft skills in...

1 Jul 2025

Five misconceptions about hiring refugees

20 Jun 2025

Forward features list 2025 – submitting content to...

23 Nov 2024

Features list 2021 – submitting content to Personnel...

1 Sep 2020

Large firms have no plans to bring all...

26 Aug 2020

A typical work-from-home lunch: crisps

24 Aug 2020

  • Empower and engage for the future: A revolution in talent development (webinar) WEBINAR | As organisations strive...Read more
  • Empowering working parents and productivity during the summer holidays SPONSORED | Businesses play a...Read more
  • AI is here. Your workforce should be ready. SPONSORED | From content creation...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+