Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Employment lawDepartment for Business and Trade (DBT)Latest NewsEconomics, government & businessSettlement agreements

Cable’s employment law reforms meet with mixed response

by John Eccleston 14 Sep 2012
by John Eccleston 14 Sep 2012

The Government’s latest employment law reforms have been met with a lukewarm response from employment lawyers and industry bodies.

Business secretary Vince Cable today unveiled measures aimed at giving employers “more flexibility and confidence in managing their workforce”, including a reduced cap on unfair dismissal payouts and a consultation on settlement agreements.

These measures include: model draft letters to send to an employee when offering a voluntary severance package; a draft model settlement agreement and supporting guidance; and the proposed terms of a statutory code of practice on the use of settlement agreements.

The measures also include proposals to make it easier for tribunal judges to dismiss weak cases.

In addition, the Government plans to work with Acas to improve guidance for small businesses on the Acas code of practice on discipline and grievance, but not to change the code itself as originally proposed. There are also plans to consult on changes to TUPE rules.

Cable said: “We have been looking across the range of employment laws with a view to making it easier for firms to hire staff while protecting basic labour rights.

“Our starting point is that Britain already has very flexible labour markets. But we acknowledge that more can be done to help small companies by reducing the burden of employment tribunals, which we are reforming, and moving to less confrontational dispute resolutions through settlement agreements.”

No-fault dismissals shelved

But perhaps the most significant element of today’s announcement is something which wasn’t put forward – the controversial “no-fault dismissals” proposed by Adrian Beecroft in a report to the Government earlier this year have been shelved. Under the proposals, businesses would have been able to dismiss under-performing staff without identifying any fault on the employee’s part, by paying a set amount of compensation.

The decision to not introduce no-fault dismissals was welcomed by the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (CIPD). But CIPD employee relations adviser Mike Emmott warned that today’s proposals had the potential to damage relationships between employers and employees: “The idea that businesses should be able to manage the performance of their employees effectively, without fearing extortionate costs and a time consuming process, is a good one. However, the proposed reforms must not undermine the principle of mutual trust and confidence that lies at the heart of positive and productive employment relations.”

A passage in the consultation document on settlement agreements reads: “Sometimes it is better for both parties to reach an agreement quickly rather than go through months of performance management only to end up with a dismissal at a later date.” This suggests that Emmott’s concerns are not without foundation, since the aim of performance management is to raise employees’ performance or gather the evidence to dismiss.

Underwhelmed response

Elsewhere, there has been a largely underwhelmed response to Cable’s announcement. Steve Radley, director of policy at the manufacturers’ organisation EEF, said: “Today’s announcement provided welcome confirmation that government is refocusing on some of the issues that matter for growth such as TUPE, reform of employment tribunals and settlement agreements. But business will be underwhelmed that the overall package contained nothing to speed up progress on delivering these reforms.

“The coalition is now half way through its term, yet there continues to be a lack of progress and cohesion with its plans for employment reform. The Government has missed the opportunity to send a powerful signal to business that it has got its programme of delivering genuine employment reform back on track.”

Meanwhile, Marc Jones, head of employment and HR at Turbervilles Solicitors, questioned whether or not these reforms have actually changed anything. He said: “I have seen the provisional announcement that plans for ‘no-fault dismissals’ have been scrapped, which is clearly sensible as in my view this was ill-thought out, as putting a bar on the right to claim unfair dismissal was clearly open to abuse by unscrupulous and/or clever employers and lawyers.

“Cable has announced more power to businesses to sack underperforming employees but the details are not clear. If he means the use of settlement agreements, then this is nothing new, as we currently have compromise agreements in place, which provide for underperforming employees, and these will in the future be known as settlement agreements.

“We do not appear to be any further than we currently are and the status quo has largely remained the same.”

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Sheila Fahy, senior employment lawyer at Allen & Overy said: “Today’s package for business amounts to very little, just more consultation, more guidance, more waiting.”

XpertHR has full analysis of the reforms announced today.

John Eccleston

previous post
Company car schemes on the rise as salary pressures remain
next post
A minute with the RADs judges – Manda Crowder, founder, andsome

You may also like

Doctors vote for return to strike action

8 Jul 2025

‘Frustrating’ that NHS Plan has overlooked OH, warns...

8 Jul 2025

Employment Rights Bill set to ban employer NDAs

8 Jul 2025

Young people unprepared for world of work, says...

8 Jul 2025

Empower and engage for the future: A revolution...

7 Jul 2025

Bereavement leave to extend to miscarriages before 24...

7 Jul 2025

One in seven ‘revenge quit’ in latest employee...

7 Jul 2025

Skills shortfall in construction threatens housing target

4 Jul 2025

Company director wins £15k after being told to...

4 Jul 2025

MPs demand Home Office tightens visas to protect...

4 Jul 2025

  • Empowering working parents and productivity during the summer holidays SPONSORED | Businesses play a...Read more
  • AI is here. Your workforce should be ready. SPONSORED | From content creation...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+