Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise

Dismissal

A dismissal is the termination of an individual's employment by the employer. Employees have a right not to be unfairly dismissed from employment.

Before dismissing an employee, employers need to make sure that they have a potentially fair reason. The five potentially fair reasons for dismissal are: capability or qualifications; conduct; redundancy; where continued employment would contravene the law; and “some other substantial reason”.

A dismissal can also be constructive, where an employee resigns in response to his or her employer's breach of contract.


    • Employee relations
    • Employment law
    • Latest News

    Lawyer suggests Crystal Palace may have ‘shot itself in the foot’ over contract after chairman of football club sues former manager

    by dan thomas 1 Jun 2006
    by dan thomas 1 Jun 2006

    Crystal Palace football club could be fall guys in manager-go-round saga.

    • Employment law
    • Latest News
    • Dismissal

    Employer fined for dismissing Reserve Forces worker

    by Mike Berry 24 May 2006
    by Mike Berry 24 May 2006

    A UK employer has been fined for dismissing a worker in the Reserve Forces who was called up to fight in Iraq - the first case of its kind

    • Case law
    • Employment law
    • Dismissal

    Case round-up: Misguided dismissals

    by Personnel Today 9 May 2006
    by Personnel Today 9 May 2006

    West Coast Trains Limited (WCT) v Murphy, EAT, 4 April 2006

    • Employment law
    • Dismissal

    Legal Q&A Standard dismissal procedure

    by Personnel Today 9 May 2006
    by Personnel Today 9 May 2006

    Following best practice is the key to trouble-free dismissals.

    • Employment law
    • Dismissal

    Weekly dilemma: Dismissals

    by Personnel Today 11 Apr 2006
    by Personnel Today 11 Apr 2006

    We have an employee who has been under-performing for some time, and they have now fallen out with one of...

    • Constructive dismissal
    • Employment law
    • Dismissal

    Dismissal: Polkey’s place in the modern world

    by Personnel Today 11 Apr 2006
    by Personnel Today 11 Apr 2006

    A recent unfair dismissal ruling shows that the Polkey principle still plays an important role.

    • Employment law
    • Dismissal
    • Movers and shakers

    Spotlight on breaking bad news

    by Personnel Today 14 Mar 2006
    by Personnel Today 14 Mar 2006

    It's often down to HR to be the bearer of bad news. But there are ways to do this without causing more upset than necessary.

    • Employment law
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Disability

    Sacked diabetic goes to tribunal

    by Georgina Fuller 4 Jan 2006
    by Georgina Fuller 4 Jan 2006

    A shopfloor worker who claimed she was sacked for being diabetic is taking her case to an employment tribunal

    • Case law
    • Employment law
    • Dismissal

    Pacitti Jones v O’Brien

    by Personnel Today 1 Jan 2006
    by Personnel Today 1 Jan 2006

    Calculating a period of continuous employment

    • Case law
    • Employment law
    • Dismissal

    Harding v Hampshire County Council

    by Personnel Today 1 Jan 2006
    by Personnel Today 1 Jan 2006

    Unfair dismissal: disciplinary investigations

    • Employment law
    • Latest News
    • Dismissal

    German boss targets whingers with two-moans-and-out policy

    by Personnel Today 9 Nov 2005
    by Personnel Today 9 Nov 2005

    A German company has made whingeing in the office a sackable offence

    • Employment law
    • Dismissal

    Getting tough on the awkward squad

    by Personnel Today 1 Nov 2005
    by Personnel Today 1 Nov 2005

    Being good at a job may no longer be enough to prevent difficult staff from being dismissed

    • Employment law
    • Dismissal
    • The HR profession

    This week, Personnel Today is on something of a health kick. While many practising fitness freaks will be hopping on to a treadmill right now, Guru is perfectly content just to get on the bandwagon.

    by Michael Millar 25 Oct 2005
    by Michael Millar 25 Oct 2005

    Pekka picks pocket for productivity; Pitch darkness to make spines tingle; Ear to the Ground

    • Employment law
    • Dismissal

    Weekly dilemma

    by Personnel Today 25 Oct 2005
    by Personnel Today 25 Oct 2005

    Sarah Ward, solicitor at Magrath & Co, answers this week's dilemma

    • Employment law
    • Latest News
    • Dismissal

    Boss who sacked staff by text message to face court action

    by Mike Berry 24 Oct 2005
    by Mike Berry 24 Oct 2005

    The director of a no-win no-fee compensation firm that sacked its 2,500 staff by text is to face court action by the government

Newer Posts
Older Posts

  • Workplace health benefits need to be simplified SPONSORED | Long-term sickness...Read more
  • Work smart – stay well: Avoid unnecessary pain with centred ergonomics SPONSORED | If you often notice...Read more
  • Elevate your L&D strategy at the World of Learning 2025 SPONSORED | This October...Read more
  • How to employ a global workforce from the UK (webinar) WEBINAR | With an unpredictable...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits Live
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise