Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • Maternity & Paternity
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • Maternity & Paternity
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Tribunal WatchAge discriminationBullying and harassment

Age discrimination: £63,000 for salesperson nicknamed “Gramps”

by Stephen Simpson 7 Mar 2016
by Stephen Simpson 7 Mar 2016 Posed by model.
Posed by model.

An employment tribunal awarded more than £63,000 for age discrimination to a salesperson who was nicknamed “Gramps” by his younger colleagues and later dismissed after customer complaints that he was “old fashioned” and “long in the tooth”. Stephen Simpson summarises this recent tribunal decision.

Dismissal of salesperson nicknamed “Gramps” was tainted by age discrimination
The employment tribunal decision in Dove v Brown & Newirth Ltd shows that, not only can nicknames related to a protected characteristic be harassment, but they can also be part of the evidence in other types of discrimination claim.

Workplace nicknames: case law

“Yoda” nickname among evidence of age bias

“Borat” nickname for Polish employee was discrimination

Frenchman’s claim over “Inspector Clouseau” nickname

“Ironside” nickname for wheelchair user was harassment

Mr Dove was a long-serving salesperson with a jewellery manufacturer until his dismissal at the age of 60.

At some point, the head of sales (who was considerably younger than the claimant) began using the nickname “Gramps” for Mr Dove in emails, and verbally while others were present.

Mr Dove did not complain about the nickname, which was used for a number of years.

There was also evidence that Mr Dove had referred to himself as “Gramps” in an email.

Mr Dove was dismissed following the transfer of some of his key accounts to the head of sales.

His dismissal also followed suggestions that customers had described him as “old fashioned” or “long in the tooth” and had said that his “traditional” approach was out of step with their business needs.

Mr Dove claimed age discrimination in the employment tribunal.

In upholding the age discrimination claim, the employment tribunal decided that Mr Dove’s dismissal was influenced by customers’ stereotypical views.

The tribunal was in no doubt that phrases such as “old fashioned” and “long in the tooth” were references to Mr Dove’s age.

In essence, the employer adopted the customers’ discriminatory and stereotypical attitudes without further enquiry.

The tribunal also took into account that younger colleagues referred to Mr Dove as “Gramps”, which suggested that ageist attitudes were tolerated in this workplace.

Mr Dove was awarded a total of £63,391.

Read more details of the case and practical tips in the light of the judgment…

 

Workplace nicknames: tribunal’s view in this case

“The respondent accepts that the claimant was referred to by an age-specific nickname of ‘Gramps’ by one of its own employees. We accept that this was not meant to be offensive, but that does not mean that it was not discriminatory. We have accepted that the claimant found it disrespectful and hurtful. Such a comment made once or twice might not cause offence but, if used more often, could lead, with justification, to a real detriment. The fact that it was banter does not really assist the respondent.”

Avatar
Stephen Simpson

Stephen Simpson is a principal employment law editor at XpertHR. His areas of responsibility include the policies and documents and law reports. After obtaining a law degree and training to be a solicitor, he moved into publishing, initially with Butterworths. He joined XpertHR in its early days in 2001.

previous post
Statutory redundancy pay to increase from 6 April 2016
next post
Employment law changes April 2016: an eight-point checklist

You may also like

Aspers casino cashier excluded by colleagues wins £75k...

23 May 2022

Policeman dubbed ‘Dolly Parton’ for working Nine to...

20 May 2022

BNP Paribas banker accused of ’emotional terrorism’ wins...

19 May 2022

Police Scotland pays out £948,000 to female officer...

16 May 2022

Employment tribunal: use of word ‘bald’ can amount...

13 May 2022

Dealing with bullying in uncertain times

10 May 2022

MPs call for parliament HR department

3 May 2022

Sexual harassment in the Army ‘part of a...

13 Apr 2022

Record ethnic diversity in NHS, but barriers to...

8 Apr 2022

P&O Ferries chef launches unfair dismissal and discrimination...

6 Apr 2022
  • The Search for Talent: Six Major Employer Pitfalls PROMOTED | The Great Resignation continues unabated...Read more
  • Navigating the widening “Skills Confidence Gap” in 2022, and beyond PROMOTED | Cornerstone OnDemand conducted a global study...Read more
  • Apprenticeships are the solution to your recruitment problems PROMOTED | Apprenticeships have the pulling power...Read more
  • What it really means to be mentally fit PROMOTED | What is mental fitness...Read more
  • How music can help to ease anxiety at work PROMOTED | A lot has happened since March 2020, hasn’t it?...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2022

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2022 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • Maternity & Paternity
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+