Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Tribunal WatchBriberyCase lawEthicsDiscipline

Bribery Act 2010: worker fairly dismissed for taking bribe despite reporting it

by Stephen Simpson 18 Jan 2016
by Stephen Simpson 18 Jan 2016 The claimant worked for the Home Office in Croydon
The claimant worked for the Home Office in Croydon

An employment tribunal held that an immigration officer was fairly dismissed for accepting a bribe from an offender, despite then returning the money and reporting it. Stephen Simpson rounds up recent tribunal decisions.

Employee fairly dismissed after taking bribe contrary to Bribery Act 2010
In Blake v Home Office, an employment tribunal found the dismissal of an immigration officer, for taking and not immediately reporting a bribe, to be fair.

Bribery Act 2010

Take steps to prevent bribery

Anti-bribery policy

Bribery: good practice guide

The claimant worked for the Home Office in Croydon. She was dismissed for gross misconduct after accepting money from an immigration offender.

Although the claimant returned the money – thought to be around £200 – and reported the bribe, the employer considered that she had not made a timely report of the incident.

The immediate reporting of an attempted bribe is required by the employer’s guidance to staff on the Bribery Act 2010, and her actions breached the employer’s anti-corruption policy.

The immigration officer claimed unfair dismissal in an employment tribunal.

The employment tribunal held that the employer was entitled to conclude that the claimant should be dismissed for taking a bribe contrary to the Bribery Act 2010 and the employer’s policy prohibiting bribe-taking.

The tribunal indicated that, as the claimant performed an important public function that required a high degree of trust, her conduct was serious enough to warrant dismissal.

This was despite her returning the money, reporting the incident and having a previously unblemished record.

Read more details of the case and practical tips in light of the judgment…

Other tribunal decisions in the headlines

Security guard sacked after saying colleague was “f***ing gorgeous”
An employment tribunal ruled that describing a female colleague as “f***ing gorgeous” was a sackable offence, reports The Sun.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Couple harassed by sex-obsessed boss are awarded nearly £40,000
A young couple have told of their “relief” after being awarded almost £40,000 for sexual harassment over their sex-obsessed boss taunting them about their love lives, according to the Mirror.

Mayor Joe Anderson “cannot reveal legal advice” on £89,000 tribunal costs
Councillors say that “many questions remain unanswered” after Liverpool Mayor Joe Anderson said that he cannot reveal legal advice documents about why the council footed a £89,000 legal bill, says the Southport Visiter.

Stephen Simpson

Stephen Simpson is Principal HR Strategy and Practice Editor at Brightmine. His areas of responsibility include the policies and documents and law reports. After obtaining a law degree and training to be a solicitor, he moved into publishing, initially with Butterworths. He joined Brightmine in its early days in 2001.

previous post
Fit for Work service: raising employer awareness
next post
Seven tips for preparing a redundancy selection criteria matrix

You may also like

‘Be direct’ to avoid escalating conflict, advises Acas

30 Jun 2025

Fear of confrontation means disputes escalate – research

25 Jun 2025

Man who used company credit card for himself...

23 Jun 2025

Barts nurse told to remove watermelon image claims...

19 Jun 2025

Date set for X’s appeal against unfair dismissal...

18 Jun 2025

WFH employee who falsified timesheets loses unfair dismissal...

16 Jun 2025

Sleeping security officer wins £20k for unfair dismissal

16 Jun 2025

The employer strikes back: the rise of ‘quiet...

13 Jun 2025

Lawyers warn over impact of Employment Rights Bill...

13 Jun 2025

Workplace disputes: ‘Most employment tribunals could be avoided’

12 Jun 2025

  • Empowering working parents and productivity during the summer holidays SPONSORED | Businesses play a...Read more
  • AI is here. Your workforce should be ready. SPONSORED | From content creation...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+