Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • Maternity & Paternity
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • Maternity & Paternity
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Latest NewsSex discriminationEmployment tribunalsPart-time workingRedundancy

Capita unfairly dismissed employee whose role was made full-time

by Ashleigh Webber 16 Oct 2019
by Ashleigh Webber 16 Oct 2019 Capita's head office in Leeds.
Image: Shutterstock
Capita's head office in Leeds.
Image: Shutterstock

An employee who was made redundant when Capita Customer Management refused to allow her to continue working part time following a restructure has won an unfair dismissal and indirect sex discrimination claim.

After returning from an extended period of leave, comprising maternity leave and a career break, Mrs McBride requested flexible working hours to help her manage the health of her children, one of whom had a rare condition.

Job sharing

BBC appoints group HR directors in job share

Employers more willing to consider job shares at senior level

The request was refused by her employer, which provides outsourced customer management services, because her role required her to be in the office Monday to Friday.

However, she was told about the possibility of a job share with someone returning from maternity leave which would allow her to work from Wednesday to Friday.

The intention was that McBride and the other employee would share tasks relating to a project, sharing the role of operations improvement manager.

Her manager, Mr Lovell, told the Sheffield employment tribunal that he had reservations about the job share before it began and believed there would be risks to the quality and efficiency of project delivery, problems with accountability, and continuity issues for internal and external stakeholders.

McBride said the job share began to be “diluted” in December 2017, a month after it began, when her manager began giving her and the other employee separate projects so there was no longer any shared responsibility.

A review of the team McBride worked on began and Lovell felt the team needed a flatter structure. He was of the view that the roles needed to be carried out on a full-time basis to ensure it could meet the requirements of a large client, moving from a structure with two part-time and one full-time staff to one with three full-time employees.

A new full-time operations improvement manager role was proposed and McBride and the employee she shared the role with were told they were at risk of redundancy.

McBride challenged her manager about the rationale behind the belief that part-time working or a job share could be successful in the new role. She felt the working arrangement had not been adequately tested and felt the reasoning for not considering part-time working had not been based on a reasonable benchmark.

She pointed out that no concerns had been raised about her performance or her ability to perform the role on a part-time basis, stating that she had been told she delivered more than full-time employees.

After several further meetings and appeals, McBride was put on notice of redundancy and her contract was terminated on 6 September 2018. The colleague sharing the role was also made redundant.

In its judgment published this week, the tribunal says the decision to prevent the role from being carried out by part-time or job-share staff was based on “unsubstantiated opinion” which her line manager had harboured from before the role began to be shared.

It found that making the job full-time had a “discriminatory effect” as it prevented certain staff from performing the role. The tribunal found McBride had been unfairly dismissed as the changes to the operations improvement manager role did not constitute redundancy.

“We do not consider that any such fine tuning of the way in which the role was conducted makes it work of a different kind. Accordingly we find that there was no redundancy situation in law with the result that that could not be a fair reason for dismissing the claimant,” judge Robert Little said.

The judgment did not say whether an award has been made.

Ashleigh Webber
Ashleigh Webber

Ashleigh is editor at OHW+ and part of the Personnel Today editorial team. Prior to joining Personnel Today in 2018, she covered the road transport sector for Commercial Motor and Motor Transport.

previous post
Retraining service expanded into new regions
next post
Unemployment may be three times higher than statistics suggest

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

You may also like

Flexible working requests: what is an employer’s obligation?

4 Feb 2022

Pensions: Making more staff eligible for auto-enrolment will...

5 Jan 2022

BA cabin crew member denied flexibility to help...

29 Sep 2021

Day-one right to request flexible working consultation confirmed

23 Sep 2021

Jo Swinson to lead research into flexible furlough’s...

7 Sep 2021

Estate agent refused 5pm finish wins £185,000 payout

7 Sep 2021

Childcare issues force one in six to cut...

25 Aug 2021

Cut cost of job shares to incentivise uptake,...

8 Jul 2021

NHS ‘Catch-22’ scenario could lead to doctor shortage

5 Jul 2021

Furloughed staff ‘don’t want to go back to...

21 Jun 2021
  • Apprenticeships are the solution to your recruitment problems PROMOTED | Apprenticeships have the pulling power...Read more
  • What it really means to be mentally fit PROMOTED | What is mental fitness...Read more
  • How music can help to ease anxiety at work PROMOTED | A lot has happened since March 2020, hasn’t it?...Read more
  • Why now is the time to plug the unhealthy gap PROMOTED | We’ve all heard the term ‘health is wealth’...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2022

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2022 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • Maternity & Paternity
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+