Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Reasonable adjustmentsDisability discriminationEmployment lawEquality, diversity and inclusionCase law

Duty to make reasonable adjustments: five tips from case law

by Eleanor Gelder 5 Dec 2016
by Eleanor Gelder 5 Dec 2016 WestEnd61/REX/Shutterstock.
WestEnd61/REX/Shutterstock.

The duty to make reasonable adjustments for disabled workers requires employers to consider what is “reasonable”. But how can employers make sure they stay on the right side of this requirement? We round up five examples where the courts and tribunals found that the duty was triggered.

1. Beware that pay protection may be a reasonable adjustment

Duty to make reasonable adjustments resources

Duty to make reasonable adjustments: FAQs

Employment law manual: Reasonable adjustments

Good practice manual: Reasonable adjustments

How to make reasonable adjustments in the recruitment process

Employers should exercise caution and take into account all the surrounding circumstances when deciding whether or not to protect a disabled employee’s salary level if he or she agrees to move to a lower-graded post.

In G4S Cash Solutions (UK) Ltd v Powell, the EAT held that protecting an employee’s pay may be a reasonable adjustment to counter a disabled employee’s disadvantage.

 

2. Poor memory may trigger duty to make reasonable adjustments

Where an employer applies a provision, criterion or practice that “bites harder” on a disabled employee, the duty to make reasonable adjustments will be triggered.

In Perratt v City of Cardiff Council, the EAT held that the employer’s duty to consider the adjustment of allowing an employee with a poor memory (caused by a disability) to record meetings was triggered.

 

3. Consider all reasonable adjustments before commencing performance reviews

Employers should consider making all reasonable adjustments to enable an employee’s performance to improve, before instigating formal performance reviews.

In South Staffordshire & Shropshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust v Billingsley, the EAT found that the performance review and dismissal of an employee with dyspraxia were discriminatory.

This was because reasonable adjustments to allow her the chance of achieving acceptable performance in her work had not been made.

 

4. Reduction in hours can be a reasonable adjustment

In Ring v Dansk almennyttigt Boligselskab DAB; Skouboe Werge v Dansk Arbejdsgiverforening, the European Court of Justice confirmed that an employer’s duty to make reasonable adjustments can include an obligation to consider a reduction in hours.

However, where employers reduce a disabled worker’s hours, there may be some exceptional cases where the employer should continue to pay the disabled employee full pay.

This might be the case where the employee could have continued working his or her existing hours, but for the employer’s failure to make other reasonable adjustments.

 

5. Expectation to work late can trigger duty to make reasonable adjustments

Where employers presume that their staff will work late, they should tread carefully when it comes to expecting disabled workers to do so.

In Carreras v United First Partners Research, the EAT held that an “expectation” that an employee work late can be a “provision, criterion or practice”, triggering the duty to make reasonable adjustments.

While there is nothing in the law to prevent an employer from asking a disabled employee to work late, the employer should do so in a sensitive manner and think carefully about the effect on the employee’s disability.

It may be a reasonable adjustment for a disabled employee to work only his or her contractual hours.

 

Duty to make reasonable adjustments: the basics

The duty to make reasonable adjustments is a unique feature of disability discrimination law.

The Equality Act 2010 places a duty on employers to make reasonable adjustments to any provision, criterion or practice that they apply and to physical features of their premises, to accommodate the needs of disabled employees and job applicants.

This duty arises whenever any aspect of the employer’s working practices or premises puts a disabled employee at a substantial disadvantage, when compared with employees who are not disabled.

A failure to comply with the duty to make reasonable adjustments constitutes discrimination under the Equality Act 2010, unless the employer lacks the relevant knowledge.

Avatar
Eleanor Gelder

previous post
Gig economy inquiry by Work and Pensions Committee launched
next post
Singapore employment law: what changes are coming in 2017?

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

You may also like

Employment law changes for 2022 and beyond: update...

1 Jul 2022

One in five workplaces lack LGBT support policies

30 Jun 2022

Christian doctor loses transgender pronoun case, but beliefs...

29 Jun 2022

Attracting diverse young talent to the ‘secret’ world...

28 Jun 2022

Gender pay gap ‘won’t close until 2151’

27 Jun 2022

Don’t be gloomy over social mobility in the...

24 Jun 2022

Christian awarded £22k following dismissal over religious necklace

24 Jun 2022

Long Covid: what tribunal’s disability ruling means for...

23 Jun 2022

Bias stopping STEM professionals returning after career break

23 Jun 2022

Black, Asian and LGBTQ+ workers ‘overlooked’ at work

20 Jun 2022
  • NSPCC revamps its learning strategy with child wellbeing at its heart PROMOTED | The NSPCC’s mission is to prevent abuse and neglect...Read more
  • Diversity versus inclusion: Why the difference matters PROMOTED | It’s possible for an environment to be diverse, but not inclusive...Read more
  • Five steps for organisations across the globe to become more skills-driven PROMOTED | The shift in the world of work has been felt across the globe...Read more
  • The future of workforce development PROMOTED | Northumbria University and partners share insight...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2022

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2022 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+