Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Sickness absenceHolidays and holiday payWorking Time Regulations

ECJ considers holiday carry-over beyond sick leave

by Stephen Simpson 30 Mar 2017
by Stephen Simpson 30 Mar 2017 The Sash Windows judgment could be the highest-profile employment ruling to come out of the ECJ in Luxembourg in the run-up to Brexit. Photo: Action Press/REX/Shutterstock.
The Sash Windows judgment could be the highest-profile employment ruling to come out of the ECJ in Luxembourg in the run-up to Brexit. Photo: Action Press/REX/Shutterstock.

A worker’s annual leave can be carried over into the following holiday year if sickness absence prevents holiday from being taken. But what if a worker is prevented from taking leave for other reasons beyond their control?

A European Court of Justice (ECJ) case heard on 29 March has the potential to extend when employers must allow workers to carry over holiday.

Keep track of key employment law cases on appeal

In Sash Window Workshop Ltd and another v King, Mr King was a commission-only salesperson who worked for the window company for 13 years, purportedly on a self-employed basis.

His annual leave was unpaid. Some years, he took his full annual leave entitlement, but there were a number of years in which he did not request all of it.

He tried not to take too much holiday because, if he was not working, he would not get any commission.

When Mr King’s work with the company ended, he brought an employment tribunal claim for, among other things, a series of unlawful deductions from wages for holiday not taken.

The employment tribunal accepted that both the company and Mr King had mistakenly believed that he was self-employed. He was in fact a worker.

The tribunal found that a worker who is unable to exercise the right to take annual leave is entitled to carry that leave forward into the next leave year, even though he or she has made no request to do so.

The employment tribunal accepted that the case law on holiday carry over relates to sick leave, but saw no difference in principle between being unable to take paid leave through sickness and the circumstances in Mr King’s case.

Holiday carry over: case law

Stringer and others v HM Revenue and Customs

NHS Leeds v Larner

Sood Enterprises Ltd v Healy

Plumb v Duncan Print Group Ltd

The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) agreed that, in theory, sick leave may not be the only circumstances that would prevent a worker from taking annual leave, thus entitling the work to carry over annual leave.

However, the EAT sent the case back to the tribunal to consider if Mr King was truly “unable”, for reasons beyond his control, to take annual leave and as a consequence did not exercise his right to it.

This EAT decision was appealed to the Court of Appeal, which referred the case to the ECJ. The ECJ hearing took place in Luxembourg on 29 March.

Commenting on the case’s importance, Mr King’s solicitor, Clare Gilroy-Scott of Goodman Derrick LLP, commented:

“The European court explored the issues relating to workers’ entitlements to holiday pay and payments on termination under EU law.

“The case raises specific issues faced by many UK workers who are incorrectly treated as self-employed.

“The question being whether the burden should fall to the employer to assess worker status properly, or face possible consequences upon termination, or whether it is for the employee to enforce their rights in a court or tribunal at the time, at the risk of job security.”

Mr King’s barrister, James Williams of Henderson Chambers, explained the European Commission and UK Government’s roles in the hearing:

Case law after Brexit

What impact will Brexit have on employment law?

“As expected, the submissions of the European Commission generally agreed with those advanced by Mr King, while the UK Government broadly agreed with the submissions advanced by the employer.

“One important point made by the commission was that, as the [Working Time] Directive is a health and safety measure, the burden of ensuring compliance should fall on the employer.

“It was emphasised for Mr King that the availability of a payment in lieu on termination is necessary to ensure the effectiveness of the Directive – otherwise employers would be incentivised to stop their staff from taking paid leave.”

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

The Advocate General indicated that he would deliver his non-binding opinion on 8 June.

No date has been set for the publication of the final binding decision, which could be the highest-profile employment ruling to come out of the ECJ in the run-up to Brexit.

Stephen Simpson

Stephen Simpson is Principal HR Strategy and Practice Editor at Brightmine. His areas of responsibility include the policies and documents and law reports. After obtaining a law degree and training to be a solicitor, he moved into publishing, initially with Butterworths. He joined Brightmine in its early days in 2001.

previous post
Learning teams must accelerate the path towards digital, says leading analyst
next post
Great Repeal Bill: No immediate changes to workers’ rights

You may also like

Restaurant tips should be included in holiday pay

21 May 2025

Union rep teacher awarded £370k for unfair dismissal

15 May 2025

Period pain and absence harm women’s pay and...

13 May 2025

Two-thirds of school leaders suffering mental ill health

6 May 2025

Bank holidays: six things employers need to know

2 May 2025

Employers struggling to manage rising levels of sickness...

7 Apr 2025

Top 10 HR questions March 2025: Carrying over...

2 Apr 2025

Employers failing to tell cancer carers of their...

31 Mar 2025

Working when the clocks go forward: how should...

30 Mar 2025

HR and businesses respond to Spring Statement

26 Mar 2025

  • 2025 Employee Communications Report PROMOTED | HR and leadership...Read more
  • The Majority of Employees Have Their Eyes on Their Next Move PROMOTED | A staggering 65%...Read more
  • Prioritising performance management: Strategies for success (webinar) WEBINAR | In today’s fast-paced...Read more
  • Self-Leadership: The Key to Successful Organisations PROMOTED | Eletive is helping businesses...Read more
  • Retaining Female Talent: Four Ways to Reduce Workplace Drop Out PROMOTED | International Women’s Day...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+