Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Rest periodsEmployee relationsEmployment lawEmployee communicationsWorking Time Regulations

Employers make liberal use of working time regulations opt-out

by Mark Crail 26 Nov 2007
by Mark Crail 26 Nov 2007

Many organisations routinely ask key employees to opt out of working time limits even though there is little prospect that they will exceed the legal limits, according to a study by Personnel Today’s sister publication, Employment Review.

The survey of 163 organisations, which together employ nearly 500,000 people, found that seven out of 10 employers (71%) ask at least some of their managers to sign an opt-out form releasing them from the protection of the Working Time Regulations.

Professional workers – ranging from engineers to doctors – are also asked to opt out as a matter of course in almost as many organisations (68%).

However, the survey shows that just over half of all organisations have employees in either group who actually work non-standard hours.

Under the Working Time Regulations, most workers are protected from working more than 48 hours a week averaged over 17 consecutive weeks. The regulations also govern rest periods and holidays.

But ‘workers’ (a category that includes both employees and seasonal, casual and temporary staff) can sign an individual waiver exempting themselves from the 48-hour limit.

The survey shows that workers in personal and protective services – mostly in the public sector or organisations providing similar services – are least likely to be asked to sign an opt-out. Just one in eight employers (12%) asks any of the workers in this group to do so.

Clerical and secretarial employees are least likely to work any non-standard hours, with just one in six employers (17%) reporting that they had workers in this category.

But where you work is key factor

The non-standard working week is a feature of management life in the public sector – but in the manufacturing and production sector it is more common among manual workers, the Employment Review study shows.

While seven out of 10 public sector organisations (69%) have managers who work non-standard hours (defined as working time that falls outside the basic working week), this falls to 57% of private sector services firms and 39% of manufacturers.

At the same time, just one in four public sector organisations (25%) asks skilled manual workers to work non-standard hours and one in three (31%) requires this of semi-skilled manual workers. Among manufacturing companies, these figures rise to 61% and 72%.

The survey also shows that clerical and secretarial staff who want a relatively easy life should opt for a manufacturing or public sector employer, where just 11% and 13% respectively will require them to work non-standard hours.

This doubles to 22% among companies operating in private sector services.

Work-time waivers banked for future

Most organisations that ask employees to sign a working time waiver do so at the point they make a job offer, the Employment Review survey shows.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Seven out of 10 (70%) of those surveyed said they would ask new recruits to opt out of the legal protections afforded by the regulations at the beginning of the employment relationship. This rose to 90% in relation to managers.

The remaining three out of 10 organisations making use of the opt-out (30%) said that they would ask workers to sign a waiver if and when the need arose to exceed the limits laid down in the regulations.

Mark Crail

Mark Crail worked on XpertHR from 2001 until 2020, most recently as content director. He led the salary survey and HR data benchmarking services, overseeing the collection and publication of pay data through the Job Pricing tool and its wider HR research programme which forms the core of XpertHR Benchmarking.

previous post
AUDIO: Friday Podcast
next post
Kineo explains to E-learning Network how to get more for less

You may also like

Bereavement leave to extend to miscarriages before 24...

7 Jul 2025

Company director wins £15k after being told to...

4 Jul 2025

How can HR prepare for changes to the...

3 Jul 2025

Government publishes ‘roadmap’ for Employment Rights Bill

2 Jul 2025

Employers’ duty of care: keeping workers safe in...

27 Jun 2025

When will the Employment Rights Bill become law?

26 Jun 2025

Fear of confrontation means disputes escalate – research

25 Jun 2025

Seven ways to prepare now for the Employment...

20 Jun 2025

The employer strikes back: the rise of ‘quiet...

13 Jun 2025

Data ‘blind spots’ blighting employee relations

13 Jun 2025

  • Empowering working parents and productivity during the summer holidays SPONSORED | Businesses play a...Read more
  • AI is here. Your workforce should be ready. SPONSORED | From content creation...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+