Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Tribunal WatchCase lawDismissalImmigrationMigrant workers

Fair dismissal for failure to produce evidence of right to work in UK

by Stephen Simpson 22 Nov 2016
by Stephen Simpson 22 Nov 2016 The claimant moved from Jamaica as a child, giving him the "right of abode" (right to live indefinitely) in the UK. Photo: imageBROKER/REX/Shutterstock.
The claimant moved from Jamaica as a child, giving him the "right of abode" (right to live indefinitely) in the UK. Photo: imageBROKER/REX/Shutterstock.

An employment tribunal held that an employee was fairly dismissed after failing to produce evidence of his right to work in the UK when his employer ran checks on its workforce’s immigration status. Stephen Simpson rounds up recent tribunal decisions.

Dismissal of employee with no evidence of right to work in UK was fair
In Baker v Abellio London Ltd, the tribunal held that the employer fairly dismissed an employee who failed to produce evidence of his right to work in the UK.

Dismissal over evidence of right to work: tribunal’s view

“As the claimant is not British, but Jamaican, his passport is not…sufficient evidence that he can work, nor is his birth certificate. It is not in dispute that he has the right of abode…but he has to provide evidence…in the form of an endorsement in his passport…”

If…the employer does not obtain that evidence…it could be fined up to £20,000 and/or face criminal liability. There are no allowances made…for someone who is lawfully in the UK.”

During checks on immigration status, a bus company asked Mr Baker to provide evidence of his right to work in the UK.

Mr Baker, who was born in Jamaica but has lived in the UK since childhood, has the right of abode (the right to live indefinitely) in the UK. However, his Jamaican passport had expired and he had no other evidence of his right to work in the UK.

The employer lent £350 to Mr Baker to cover the cost of obtaining a valid Jamaican passport and an endorsement in the passport confirming his right to work in the UK.

The claimant applied for a passport, but not the endorsement. The employer received advice from the Home Office that the passport alone, without an endorsement, was not sufficient evidence of the right to work.

The employer wrote to the claimant asking him to obtain the endorsement as evidence of his indefinite leave to remain in the UK.

However, Mr Baker did not provide the evidence and did not attend a meeting arranged by the employer to discuss the situation, including the risk of dismissal.

The employer dismissed Mr Baker for not providing proof of his right to work in the UK. Mr Baker’s appeal against dismissal was rejected.

Mr Baker claimed unfair dismissal in the employment tribunal.

While the tribunal expressed its sympathy for Mr Baker, it concluded that the employer was correct to require evidence of his immigration status.

Without that evidence, the employer was left with no option but to dismiss Mr Baker, despite his legal right to be in the UK.

In finding the dismissal to be fair, the tribunal accepted that the employer had followed a satisfactory procedure. The employer had:

Proof of right to work in UK

Documentation for indefinite right to work in UK (list A)

Documentation for limited right to work in UK (list B)

  • investigated Mr Baker’s immigration status;
  • explained verbally and in writing to him what evidence he had to produce;
  • warned him of the risk of dismissal;
  • provided him with a loan to cover the costs;
  • given him opportunities to obtain proof; and
  • allowed him to appeal against his dismissal.

Read more details of the case and practical tips in the light of the judgment…

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

 

Other tribunal decisions in the headlines

Disabled teacher sacked over Halloween film awarded £180,000
A disabled teacher who was sacked for gross misconduct after showing the 18-rated film Halloween to 16-year-old students has won at least £180,000, reports the Yorkshire Post.

Stephen Simpson

Stephen Simpson is Principal HR Strategy and Practice Editor at Brightmine. His areas of responsibility include the policies and documents and law reports. After obtaining a law degree and training to be a solicitor, he moved into publishing, initially with Butterworths. He joined Brightmine in its early days in 2001.

previous post
Disciplinary procedures: three case law lessons for employers
next post
Robots vs humans? AI and the future of the workplace

You may also like

UK net migration slashed by half in one...

22 May 2025

Consultation launched after Supreme Court ‘sex’ ruling

20 May 2025

Black security manager awarded £360k after decade of...

20 May 2025

Immigration white paper: which jobs will be affected?

19 May 2025

Union rep teacher awarded £370k for unfair dismissal

15 May 2025

EHRC bows to pressure and extends gender consultation

15 May 2025

Tribunal finds need for degree in redundancy selection...

14 May 2025

‘Polygamous working’ is a minefield for HR

14 May 2025

Immigration white paper: 10 key points and reaction

12 May 2025

Immigration white paper: strict limits on overseas recruitment

12 May 2025

  • 2025 Employee Communications Report PROMOTED | HR and leadership...Read more
  • The Majority of Employees Have Their Eyes on Their Next Move PROMOTED | A staggering 65%...Read more
  • Prioritising performance management: Strategies for success (webinar) WEBINAR | In today’s fast-paced...Read more
  • Self-Leadership: The Key to Successful Organisations PROMOTED | Eletive is helping businesses...Read more
  • Retaining Female Talent: Four Ways to Reduce Workplace Drop Out PROMOTED | International Women’s Day...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+