Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Employment lawLatest NewsGig economyEmployment tribunals

False self-employment case adds to worker status conundrum

by Adam McCulloch 28 Jan 2022
by Adam McCulloch 28 Jan 2022 Andy Paradise/Shutterstock
Andy Paradise/Shutterstock

In a further case underlining the dangers for companies of false self-employment, a woman working as a sole trader has been deemed by an employment judge as employed.

Gemma Long presented a claim in the employment tribunal on 31 March 2021 including complaints of disability discrimination (she has ADHD), that she suffered detriments for having made protected disclosures, and for unlawful deductions from wages and for holiday pay.

The respondent, Brain in Hand, is a technology company which provides services to people with autism, mental health difficulties and neurological conditions. It has contracts with organisations including the Department for Education and the Department for Work and Pensions, to provide technology solutions and training to individuals who have been assessed as needing support.

Brain in Hand defended Ms Long’s claims primarily by explaining that the tribunal did not have jurisdiction to hear them because she was self employed and was neither a worker nor an employee.

Judge Ayre decided earlier this month that Ms Long – who had responded to a job advert stating the role was self-employed with an hourly rate of pay – was in effect an employee of the respondent according to the Employment Rights Act 1996 and worked under a contract of employment falling within section 83 of the Equality Act 2010.

After her successful application to join the firm, Ms Long attended its three-day training course, for which she was not paid. She began working for the respondent as a specialist on 30 July 2020 and worked regularly two days a week until she resigned with effect from 26 April 2021. Her role was to provide training and support to the respondent’s service users.

Employment status

Lord Hendy discusses his Status of Workers Bill

Private members’ bill aims to clear up worker status – amid silence on Taylor report

Determining employment status

What can an organisation do if the CEST tool gives an undetermined result for an IR35 assessment?

The tribunal heard that Brain in Hand also directly employed specialists, who carried out the same work as Ms Long, but had other responsibilities as well. When these employees delivered services to the firm’s service users, they provided the services in essentially the same way as the “self-employed” specialists.

Ms Long has ADHD and requested help with performing the administrative duties of her role. However, as the tribunal heard, “once she asked for a support worker as a reasonable adjustment for her ADHD, she was not offered any more work.”

This decision that she was in fact employed was reached primarily because the judge decided there was a substantial amount of control that Brain in Hand exercised over Ms Long and the way in which she carried out her work. There was also sufficient mutuality of obligations for Ms Long to be considered as employed. She was also unable to delegate her work or arrange for a substitute to perform it. There was no right of substitution in the written contract, and no right of substitution in practice.

Employment status expert and insurance firm Qdos, said the verdict could spark similar cases among self-employed and gig economy workers, along with having significant tax implications for businesses facilitating “false self-employment”.

Qdos CEO, Seb Maley, said ramifications for businesses of facilitating false self-employment in light of the case were likely to be severe.

“If a business engages someone as self-employed when in reality the relationship reflects employment, HMRC will expect the company to stump up missing employment taxes, which can mount up considerably just for one worker.

“So it goes without saying that for any business engaging or relying on sole traders, the cost of enabling false self-employment is potentially huge, both financially and reputationally.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

“Against the backdrop of Uber, Addison Lee and numerous other gig economy employment tribunals, it’s becoming increasingly important that both parties are confident in their employment status compliance and agree upon it from the outset.”

Latest HR job opportunities on Personnel Today


Browse more human resources jobs

Adam McCulloch

Adam McCulloch first worked for Personnel Today magazine in the early 1990s as a sub editor. He rejoined Personnel Today as a writer in 2017, covering all aspects of HR but with a special interest in diversity, social mobility and industrial relations. He has ventured beyond the HR realm to work as a freelance writer and production editor in sectors including travel (The Guardian), aviation (Flight International), agriculture (Farmers' Weekly), music (Jazzwise), theatre (The Stage) and social work (Community Care). He is also the author of KentWalksNearLondon. Adam first became interested in industrial relations after witnessing an exchange between Arthur Scargill and National Coal Board chairman Ian McGregor in 1984, while working as a temp in facilities at the NCB, carrying extra chairs into a conference room!

previous post
Less than half rate UK firms’ mental health support as ‘good’
next post
Movers and shakers: top HR appointments for Accenture and GSK

You may also like

Restaurant tips should be included in holiday pay

21 May 2025

Black security manager awarded £360k after decade of...

20 May 2025

Minister defends Employment Rights Bill at Acas conference

16 May 2025

CBI chair Soames accuses ministers of not listening...

16 May 2025

Union rep teacher awarded £370k for unfair dismissal

15 May 2025

Tribunal finds need for degree in redundancy selection...

14 May 2025

Construction workers win compensation claim against defunct employer

9 May 2025

NHS worker awarded £29k after Darth Vader comparison

8 May 2025

Employment tribunal backlog up 23% in a year

7 May 2025

Lincolnshire doctor awarded £250k in race discrimination case

2 May 2025

  • 2025 Employee Communications Report PROMOTED | HR and leadership...Read more
  • The Majority of Employees Have Their Eyes on Their Next Move PROMOTED | A staggering 65%...Read more
  • Prioritising performance management: Strategies for success (webinar) WEBINAR | In today’s fast-paced...Read more
  • Self-Leadership: The Key to Successful Organisations PROMOTED | Eletive is helping businesses...Read more
  • Retaining Female Talent: Four Ways to Reduce Workplace Drop Out PROMOTED | International Women’s Day...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+