Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Sexual harassmentGenderLatest NewsEmployment tribunalsSex discrimination

Female security guard wins payout after being called ‘Mr’

by Adam McCulloch 30 Nov 2020
by Adam McCulloch 30 Nov 2020 Andy Paradise/REX/Shutterstock
Andy Paradise/REX/Shutterstock

A female security guard has won a £2,000 payout for sexual harassment after being repeatedly addressed as ‘Mr’ – including in court papers.

Ms Shah’s colleagues at Morrisons supermarket in Crawley presumed she was male and commonly misgendered her.

Ms Shah worked at the supermarket in 2018-19 while being employed by Cordant Security. She was TUPE’d over to Total Security Services in April 2019.

Total Security Services admitted that an administrative error had caused it to call Ms Shah “Mr” in its witness statement to the court.

At a hearing heard over two days in August, the tribunal judge, Omar Khalil, said these errors were “very surprising”.

Employment tribunals

Tribunals have almost ground to a halt

More employment tribunals to go virtual in raft of changes

Increase tribunal time limit to six months, say lawyers

Ms Shah, from Croydon, Surrey, told the tribunal that being addressed as a man by her colleagues, despite being a woman, had led to her feeling “extremely upset”, reducing her to tears on occasion.

The misgendering was not only verbal; Ms Shah told the tribunal she was referred to at least five times in writing as a man. It was also a frequent error in telephone conversations.

One man apologised to her for making the mistake – but then continued to call her “Mr”, Ms Shah told the tribunal.

The London employment tribunal concluded that the employer should have made more of an effort to “avoid making assumptions” about its employees, although it did accept the explanation that the administrative error was the root cause.

Employment judge Khali said: “Miss Shah was referred to as Mr on several occasions in writing and verbally. Very surprisingly, the error was even present in two separate paragraphs in [the operation manager’s] statement and in [the HR representative’s] witness statement.

“That the [company] operates in a male-dominated sector would suggest that even more attention ought to be paid to avoid discriminatory assumptions.”

The judge said he found it reasonable for Miss Shah to be offended by the continued misgendering: “She referred to the increase in her anxiety and stress, that she found this extremely upsetting and that she did cry on a few occasions,” he said.

The claim of harassment was well founded under section 26 of the Equality Act 2010 the tribunal decided, and £2,000 was awarded to Ms Shah for injury to feelings.

A separate claim over unauthorised deductions from wages that was made over travel expenses from Ms Shah’s home in Croydon was rejected by the tribunal.

Ms Shah was represented by Peninsula senior litigation consultant Mr Howson.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Read the full judgment

Latest HR job opportunities on Personnel Today

Browse more human resources jobs

Adam McCulloch

Adam McCulloch first worked for Personnel Today magazine in the early 1990s as a sub editor. He rejoined Personnel Today as a writer in 2017, covering all aspects of HR but with a special interest in diversity, social mobility and industrial relations. He has ventured beyond the HR realm to work as a freelance writer and production editor in sectors including travel (The Guardian), aviation (Flight International), agriculture (Farmers' Weekly), music (Jazzwise), theatre (The Stage) and social work (Community Care). He is also the author of KentWalksNearLondon. Adam first became interested in industrial relations after witnessing an exchange between Arthur Scargill and National Coal Board chairman Ian McGregor in 1984, while working as a temp in facilities at the NCB, carrying extra chairs into a conference room!

previous post
Dramatic fall in immigration could spark skills shortage
next post
Boardroom succession issues signalled by FTSE100 firms

You may also like

Company director wins £15k after being told to...

4 Jul 2025

Skills shortfall in construction threatens housing target

4 Jul 2025

MPs demand Home Office tightens visas to protect...

4 Jul 2025

It’s all about the Monet: how art transforms...

3 Jul 2025

Stop chasing quick fixes: return to the office...

3 Jul 2025

Asda hails major upgrade in employees’ benefits

3 Jul 2025

100% success for latest large-scale four-day week trial

3 Jul 2025

NHS 10-year Health Plan sets out vision for...

3 Jul 2025

Microsoft to cut 9,000 jobs globally as role...

3 Jul 2025

Decline in workplace deaths: falls from height remain...

3 Jul 2025

  • Empowering working parents and productivity during the summer holidays SPONSORED | Businesses play a...Read more
  • AI is here. Your workforce should be ready. SPONSORED | From content creation...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+