Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • Maternity & Paternity
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • Maternity & Paternity
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Latest NewsFurloughJob Support SchemeJob creation and lossesRetention of staff

Job Support Scheme guidance needed soon to avoid redundancies

by Ashleigh Webber 9 Oct 2020
by Ashleigh Webber 9 Oct 2020 Shutterstock
Shutterstock

Organisations are in desperate need of guidance around the Job Support Scheme in order to make decisions about their future.

According to law firm Fieldfisher, employers are crying out for further information about how the scheme will work in practice to consider whether they can safeguard jobs beyond October.

Job retention

Government will cover two-thirds of wages at firms forced to temporarily close

Job losses accelerate as furlough draws to a close

Hospitality job losses will be ‘far higher’ than expected

Its warning was issued shortly before the chancellor revealed that the government would be covering two-thirds of wages for employers legally required to close because of local and national lockdowns.

Firms claiming through the JSS will need to offer employees at least one third of their normal working hours, which Fieldfisher suggested may not be possible in some sectors, such as leisure and entertainment.

It has been a fortnight since the JSS, due to begin on 1 November, was announced by chancellor Rishi Sunak. Yet, little information about how it will work in practice has been published.

“Businesses are desperate to receive this guidance as soon as possible so they can make strategic decisions,” said Alex Watson, an employment lawyer at Fieldfisher.

“We are yet to see how effective these measures will be in practice in safeguarding and securing jobs beyond October 2020 when the current furlough scheme closes and makes clear the financial incentive for employers to utilise the new scheme, especially as it seems that there will be a number of pre-conditions which must be met before employees qualify for the government grant.

“Without this clarification from the government redundancies are still likely in some sectors e.g. hospitality, entertainment and leisure, where there continues to be no or little work.”

Under the JSS, the government will cover 22% of wages for the normal hours not worked by an employee, with the employer paying 55%. Employers must offer staff at least one third of their usual hours at their full rate of pay.

Watson said a number of large employers the law firm has advised over the past two weeks are concerned that the government would increase the minimum proportion of normal hours to be worked to a higher percentage in a few months’ time, and have questioned whether this could be sustained if further coronavirus restrictions are put in place.

But employers’ biggest concern, according to Watson, is whether using the scheme will be affordable for them. Options such as short time working, lay-offs or varied contractual terms could still be seen as the more viable.

“Where there is no requirement for employers to utilise the scheme, legally, there is nothing to prevent an employer instead looking to negotiate reduced working hours with employees or using short time working provisions – so that they only have to pay the employee for the hours actually worked.

“This issue is compounded by the fact that under the terms of the scheme the requirement for employers to pay the one-third additional wage cost of hours not worked means that it is cheaper for employers to employ one full-time employee than two part-time employees – which financially incentivises employers to make redundancies rather than reduce hours of work.”

‘Expensive’

Yesterday, Labour published a report that unfavourably compared the JSS to schemes in France, Germany and the Netherlands.

It said employers who wanted to bring two staff back for half the working week instead of keeping one employee on full-time faced much higher wage costs in the UK than they would in the three countries.

Shadow chancellor Anneliese Dodds said: “The chancellor should have introduced a job recovery scheme that incentivised employers to keep more staff on. Instead, his JSS makes it more expensive to bring staff back than many other international schemes.

“Viable businesses just need support to cope with the restrictions the government has imposed on them. They pinned their hopes on the chancellor to deliver, but he’s forcing them to flip a coin over who stays and who goes.

“This wasn’t by accident – it was by design. The chancellor’s sink or swim job support scheme is a throwback to the worst days of Thatcher, and just like in the 1980s people on the lowest incomes will pay the highest price.”

However, Watson warned employers not to disregard the JSS too quickly, “A failure to consider the scheme as an alternative means of avoiding a compulsory redundancy may increase the risk of a redundancy process being unfair, and increasing the risk of unfair dismissal (or other relevant claims) from qualifying employees.”

Latest HR job opportunities on Personnel Today

Browse more human resources jobs

Ashleigh Webber
Ashleigh Webber

Ashleigh is editor at OHW+ and part of the Personnel Today editorial team. Prior to joining Personnel Today in 2018, she covered the road transport sector for Commercial Motor and Motor Transport.

previous post
CPD: Guidance on providing support following a suicide in primary care
next post
Fewer staff taking time off for mental health, poll finds

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

You may also like

One in five employers planning ‘no jab no...

19 May 2022

BNP Paribas banker accused of ’emotional terrorism’ wins...

19 May 2022

How should HR handle the highest inflation in...

18 May 2022

How to respond to an HMRC furlough enquiry

18 May 2022

AI adoption: Skills shortages means UK lagging behind...

18 May 2022

Nurses leaving due to pressure and workplace culture

18 May 2022

Ethnic diversity: report highlights disparities in school leadership

18 May 2022

Accreditation scheme will ‘encourage LGBT+ people to be...

17 May 2022

Bald move: Tribunal was right in sex-related harassment...

17 May 2022

Number of working people with disability up 1.3...

17 May 2022
  • What it really means to be mentally fit PROMOTED | What is mental fitness...Read more
  • How music can help to ease anxiety at work PROMOTED | A lot has happened since March 2020, hasn’t it?...Read more
  • Why now is the time to plug the unhealthy gap PROMOTED | We’ve all heard the term ‘health is wealth’...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2022

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2022 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • Maternity & Paternity
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+