Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • Maternity & Paternity
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • Maternity & Paternity
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Latest NewsEmployment lawCase lawEmployment tribunalsRecruitment & retention

Court of Appeal: agency workers do not have right to apply for permanent jobs

by Ashleigh Webber 21 Feb 2022
by Ashleigh Webber 21 Feb 2022 Mr Kocur worked at Royal Mail's mail centre in Leeds
Shutterstock
Mr Kocur worked at Royal Mail's mail centre in Leeds
Shutterstock

Agency workers do not automatically have the right to be invited to apply for a directly employed vacancy with the organisation they work for, the Court of Appeal has found.

Lord Justice Green said that legislature would have been more explicit had a right to apply for permanent positions been intended under the Agency Worker Regulations 2010 and the corresponding EU directive.

The case concerned an agency worker, Mr Kocur, who worked in Royal Mail’s Leeds mail centre. He was employed by Angard Staffing Solutions, an employment agency which provides staff exclusively to Royal Mail – its parent company.

When vacancies for permanent positions at the Leeds mail office became available, they were put up on a notice board and offered first to other permanent employees and to those in a “reserve class” of postal operatives. Agency workers were not eligible to apply for the posts. They could however apply for vacancies when they were advertised externally.

Kocur was involved in a lengthy dispute with Angard Staffing Solutions about his worker status, which culminated in the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) ruling in his favour that a group of workers he was a part of were agency workers and entitled to the same employment rights as Royal Mail employees.

In his latest case before the Court of Appeal, Kocur challenged the EAT’s ruling that Royal Mail did not have to give Kocur and other agency workers an opportunity to apply for permanent positions it was recruiting for when they were advertised internally.

Agency workers

Royal Mail loses appeal against agency worker decision

What are the legal rights of agency workers? 

He argued that the EAT’s interpretation of the Agency Worker Regulations (AWR), which brought the Temporary Agency Workers EU Directive into law in the UK, had been too narrow.

He claimed that the EU directive implies that agency workers have a right to apply for those jobs, in addition to the right to be notified. His interpretation settled around the French language version of the directive, which refers to “obtenir” (obtain) rather than “trouver” (find) in relation to work.

In handing down the Court of Appeal’s ruling last week, Lord Justice Green said the court agreed with the EAT that an employer does not have to invite agency workers to apply for permanent roles.

“The issue arising on this appeal is a short point of interpretation. I should start by recording that I agree with the EAT. In my judgment neither Article 6 of the Directive nor Regulation 13 AWR confer on an agency worker a right which goes beyond a right to be notified. It does not extend to a right to apply and/or to be considered for the notified post,” the judgment says.

A right to be notified is a real advantage and this is not gainsaid simply by pointing out that the right could have been more generous and far-reaching.” – Lord Justice Green

“A right to be notified is a real advantage and this is not gainsaid simply by pointing out that the right could have been more generous and far-reaching. In one sense it suffices to say that the right is simply what it is – a limited right to be notified.

“In the real world this does confer advantages, even if modest, because as the EAT pointed out, it extends to a right to being given the same information about the vacancies as are given to internal candidates and confers an advantage in that agency workers might have advance or more direct notice if, for instance, it is also advertised to external candidates.”

Lord Justice Green said that the appellant’s analysis of the French language version of the EU directive “does not assist” his case.

“Legislation designed to assist a temporary worker ‘obtain’ work does not, by use of that phrase alone, imply that the worker in question has some inalienable right to apply for a job which an employer does not wish to make available to that worker. When viewed in the context of all the other guides to interpretation it would run counter the purpose of the Directive to attach such a supercharged meaning to this one word which would justify preferring it to the narrower English counterpart,” the judgment says.

It adds that “the legislature would have legislated explicitly” had it intended to give agency staff an automatic right to apply for permanent jobs.

Latest HR job opportunities on Personnel Today


Browse more human resources jobs

Ashleigh Webber
Ashleigh Webber

Ashleigh is editor at OHW+ and part of the Personnel Today editorial team. Prior to joining Personnel Today in 2018, she covered the road transport sector for Commercial Motor and Motor Transport.

previous post
Rees-Mogg calls for swathing civil service cuts
next post
Employers failing to support health and safety of ‘hybrid’ workers

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

You may also like

P&O Ferries denies claims about cuts to agency...

25 Apr 2022

Airlines and ports hit by staff shortages

4 Apr 2022

‘Urgent’ call for former teachers to return to...

20 Dec 2021

Union accuses Clarks of using agency staff to...

10 Nov 2021

‘Scandalous’ umbrella companies should be banned, urges TUC

29 Jul 2021

Agency worker did not accrue holiday pay on...

2 Jul 2021

Workers’ rights watchdog to be launched

8 Jun 2021

REC calls for umbrella company abuse hotline

28 May 2021

Temp worker wins holiday pay accrued on furlough

21 May 2021

Spain passes landmark gig economy law

17 May 2021
  • Strathclyde Business School expands its Degree Apprenticeship offer in England PROMOTED | The University of Strathclyde is expanding its programmes...Read more
  • The Search for Talent: Six Major Employer Pitfalls PROMOTED | The Great Resignation continues unabated...Read more
  • Navigating the widening “Skills Confidence Gap” in 2022, and beyond PROMOTED | Cornerstone OnDemand conducted a global study...Read more
  • Apprenticeships are the solution to your recruitment problems PROMOTED | Apprenticeships have the pulling power...Read more
  • What it really means to be mentally fit PROMOTED | What is mental fitness...Read more
  • How music can help to ease anxiety at work PROMOTED | A lot has happened since March 2020, hasn’t it?...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2022

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2022 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • Maternity & Paternity
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+