Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Wellbeing

Legal Q&A: Bird flu pandemic

by Personnel Today 18 Apr 2006
by Personnel Today 18 Apr 2006

It is hard to ignore the possibility of a bird flu pandemic caused by the potential mutation of the H5N1 flu virus into a strain to which humans are susceptible. If such a pandemic occurs, it will inevitably result in higher than usual levels of staff absence, which could have far-reaching effects for employers, unless precautions are taken. Cabinet Office guidance on contingency planning for a flu pandemic released in February anticipates that 25% of workers will be absent for between five and eight days over a period of three to four months due to sickness and caring responsibilities, although a worst-case scenario could see staff absenteeism peaking at 15% at the height of a pandemic. However, there are steps that employers can take to minimise the impact on their businesses, if and when such a pandemic occurs.

Q. Does an employer’s duty of care to staff extend to offering inoculation against bird flu?

A. Health and safety law requires an employer to take such steps as are reasonably necessary to ensure the safety of their employees. This does not extend to offering inoculation against an illness such as bird flu (an exception to this may be if exposure to such a disease was a necessary consequence of the employment). However, if a vaccine is available, it may be sensible for employers to offer it as a part of their contingency plan to help avoid excessive employee absence, provided that the costs do not outweigh the benefits.

Q. Are a worker’s fears of contracting bird flu sufficient grounds for refusing to attend work?

A. Fear of contracting an illness is not a sufficient reason for refusal to attend work, and an employer faced with a refusal would be entitled to consider taking disciplinary action. They could, for example, refuse to pay the employee on the basis that they are failing to perform their part of the contract.

However, employers should note the recent amendment to the Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) Regulations 1982. It states that if an employee is “excluded, abstains or [is] prevented from working” by reason of their being a carrier of, or having been in contact with, a case of a “relevant disease”, then they are deemed incapable of working for the purposes of the payment of SSP. This provision, which came into force on 10 April 2006, relaxes the earlier requirements for payment of SSP in similar circumstances. Any employees to whom this provision applies may not be disciplined for their refusal to attend work.

Q. If employee absences result in a downturn in business, can staff be laid off?

A. A downturn in business may have an impact on the amount of staff required, in which case an employer may be entitled to make employees redundant. If staff are to be laid off, the employer must be sure to carry out a proper selection and consultation procedure, including compliance with the Statutory Dismissal Procedures, to avoid the risk of unfair dismissal claims.

Q. How can companies avoid disruption to their business?

A. Employers should make plans for running their businesses with minimum staffing and consider retraining or redeploying staff. It may also be necessary to take on temporary staff, so appropriate paperwork, such as temporary contracts, should be put in place in preparation.

Employers should consider introducing measures such as flexible working to ensure as many staff as possible can continue to work. You should also consider providing accommodation in case transport disruption or movement restriction means that staff are unable to travel home for extended periods of time.

Introducing new methods of communication (such as video conferencing and webcasting) may be helpful in containing the spread of pandemic flu, as employees will not be required to travel unnecessarily.

Even smaller changes, such as introducing an information bulletin to ensure employees are up to date with all relevant information – including numbers to call if they cannot attend work and areas where movement is restricted â€“ will be helpful in ensuring that the impact of pandemic flu is minimised and businesses can continue to function at as close to normal levels as possible.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

For more on how to survive an influenza pandemic, see the May issue of Employers’ Law, out on 10 May

To attend a conference on this topic, go to www.irspandemic.co.uk


Personnel Today

Personnel Today articles are written by an expert team of award-winning journalists who have been covering HR and L&D for many years. Some of our content is attributed to "Personnel Today" for a number of reasons, including: when numerous authors are associated with writing or editing a piece; or when the author is unknown (particularly for older articles).

previous post
US chief executives paid twice as much as their counterparts in UK
next post
Weekly dilemma: Equal pay

You may also like

One in four young workers rate mental health...

17 Jun 2025

CIPD Festival of Work: ‘Wellbeing is not an...

11 Jun 2025

Employers must offer more flexibility to working carers,...

9 Jun 2025

CIPD: A quarter feel work has negative impact...

9 Jun 2025

Why cash lump sums may not be the...

5 Jun 2025

Sickness absence falls to almost pre-pandemic rate

4 Jun 2025

One-third have witnessed substance abuse at work

3 Jun 2025

Preparing for a new era of workforce planning...

3 Jun 2025

Three ways technology can boost wellbeing outcomes

27 May 2025

Workplace stress: Why it’s time to rebrand resilience

22 May 2025

  • Empowering working parents and productivity during the summer holidays SPONSORED | Businesses play a...Read more
  • AI is here. Your workforce should be ready. SPONSORED | From content creation...Read more

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+