Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

BlacklistingEmployee relationsHR practiceTrade unionsRecruitment & retention

Legal Q&A: blacklisting

by Personnel Today 15 Feb 2010
by Personnel Today 15 Feb 2010

In laymen’s terms, blacklisting is the creation of a list describing individuals who are not welcome in an organisation. In an employment context, this is most often discussed in terms of listing on the grounds of trade union membership or activism.

The government had the right to make blacklisting regulations built into the Employment Relations Act 1999, but didn’t exercise the right until now because there has been a debate about whether blacklisting is actually an issue in the modern employment landscape. Trade unions said blacklisting did go on, and that it was particularly prevalent in some sectors; in contrast, many employers denied it occurred.

However, in 2009, following an investigation by the Information Commissioner’s Office, it was alleged that 44 employers within the construction industry had been paying to use a blacklist of more than 3,000 individuals provided by a third-party organisation. Many of these organisations have been or currently are the subject of legal action. The Employment Relations Act 1999 (Blacklisting) Regulations 2010 are intended to make the use of blacklisting unlawful.

Q What do the regulations prohibit?

A In broad terms, the regulations prohibit three things. First, it is unlawful for anyone to compile, supply, sell or use a ‘prohibited list’. Second, it is unlawful for an employer to refuse employment to a job applicant, to dismiss an employee, or to subject an employee to any other detriment for a reason related to a ‘prohibited list’. It is also unlawful for an employment agency to refuse to provide its services to an individual for a reason related to a ‘prohibited list’.

Q The concept of a ‘prohibited list’ is obviously quite central – what is it?

A A ‘prohibited list’ must contain two features: it must contain ‘details’ of people who have been or are either trade union members or who have taken or are taking part in trade union activities; and the list must have been compiled with a view to employers or employment agencies for the purpose of discriminating either in recruitment or during employment on the grounds of trade union membership or activities.

Q What does the term ‘details’ cover?

A Details could be a simple as a list of names, addresses, national insurance numbers, photographs, newspaper clippings, work histories. It could even be a link to a website.

Q Won’t a lot of lists potentially be caught by the definition of a prohibited list?

A Yes, the first requirement for details is deliberately wide. The intention is that the question of whether or not a list is a prohibited list will be determined by the purposes for which it was created.

Q What happens if a list was created for several purposes?

A A list will be a prohibited list even if it was created for multiple purposes, as long as just one of those purposes is to treat union members or those who participate in trade union activities differently. Furthermore, each individual who is referred to on the list would be protected as a result of being on a prohibited list even if the reason he or she was included was not because of trade union membership or activities. This might be because they were a ‘problem’ for some other reason.

Q How easy will it be to prove there has been a breach of the blacklisting regulations?

A Under normal principles, it will be difficult because one of the key issues surrounds the motive behind the list. However, the regulations borrow the relatively rare principle of a reversing burden of proof from discrimination law. This means that if the complainant can show facts that, in the absence of any other explanation, the tribunal could conclude there had been a breach, then the tribunal must do so unless the respondent convinces the tribunal otherwise. This means, for example, that if an individual can show that his name was on a prohibited list and he was refused employment despite being suitably qualified, then the tribunal must conclude that the refusal to employ was for a reason related to a blacklist unless the respondent can demonstrate a different reason.

Q What is the penalty for breaching the regulations?

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

A The amount of compensation an individual will receive for a successful complaint primarily depends upon the loss suffered, although there is the possibility of compensation for injury to feelings in some cases. Similar to other trade union-based complaints, there is a minimum level of £5,000 compensation that must normally be awarded in the employment tribunal where compensation is subject to the normal adjustments up and downwards. There are no maximum or minimum awards in the county court or Court of Session.

Simon Ost, partner, Hammonds

Personnel Today

Personnel Today articles are written by an expert team of award-winning journalists who have been covering HR and L&D for many years. Some of our content is attributed to "Personnel Today" for a number of reasons, including: when numerous authors are associated with writing or editing a piece; or when the author is unknown (particularly for older articles).

previous post
Hairdresser stopped from advertising for ‘junior stylist’ because it is ageist
next post
RMT leaders at Virgin West Coast Main Line trains mull strike ballot

You may also like

‘Polygamous working’ is a minefield for HR

14 May 2025

Ofgem workers ballot for strike action

2 May 2025

Employment Rights Bill must be tightened to protect...

1 May 2025

Four ways HR can maintain trust in uncertain...

23 Apr 2025

Uber drivers experience ‘false autonomy’ over work

16 Apr 2025

Redefining employee relations for the future of work...

27 Mar 2025

BMA employees protest over pay and recognition

19 Mar 2025

P&O Ferries scandal: Employment Rights Bill must protect...

17 Mar 2025

Handling headcount conundrums as hiring confidence dips

10 Mar 2025

New employment rights top priority for HR teams

10 Mar 2025

  • 2025 Employee Communications Report PROMOTED | HR and leadership...Read more
  • The Majority of Employees Have Their Eyes on Their Next Move PROMOTED | A staggering 65%...Read more
  • Prioritising performance management: Strategies for success (webinar) WEBINAR | In today’s fast-paced...Read more
  • Self-Leadership: The Key to Successful Organisations PROMOTED | Eletive is helping businesses...Read more
  • Retaining Female Talent: Four Ways to Reduce Workplace Drop Out PROMOTED | International Women’s Day...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+