Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

HR practiceExecutive payHR strategyPay & benefitsLeadership

Local government HR’s rich list stand by their £100,000+ salaries

by Gareth Vorster 3 Apr 2008
by Gareth Vorster 3 Apr 2008

Local government HR chiefs justify their six-figure reward packages as delivering value for complex organisations.

The revelation that at least nine local council HR chiefs took home six-figure salaries last year would have raised a few eyebrows among colleagues in the profession.

Their wage packets featured in a so-called Town Hall Rich List compiled by pressure group the Taxpayers’ Alliance, using figures released under the Freedom of Information Act. The list revealed that 818 local authority managers earned more than £100,000 in 2006-07, up from 645 the previous year.

Topping the table of practitioners with HR as part of their remit was Alan Warner, corporate director at Hertfordshire County Council, who, according to the list, took home £146,338 in 2006-07. He was followed by Northamptonshire Council’s HR director, Hilary Jeanes, who boasted a £135,000 salary.

Those numbers far exceed the average wage of £73,264 taken home by HR directors in the private sector last year, according to a survey by recruitment firm Reed Human Resources.

The publication of public sector salary details is the equivalent of poking a stick at a bee-hive, particularly as councils and unions are currently engaged in sensitive pay talks. The findings also raise bigger questions about transparency and accountability in local government.

Hibberd’s defence

Gillian Hibberd, corporate director (people and policy) at Buckinghamshire County Council, featured in the list, and strongly defended her £101,568 wage. “My organisation has an annual turnover in excess of half a billion pounds and employs more than 14,000 people,” she said. “Comparable organisations in the private sector would undoubtedly attract similar or higher levels of salary for similar roles.”

Hibberd insisted her role was far broader than just HR. “I am a corporate director sitting on the corporate management board of the council with responsibility for managing performance across the whole authority and my salary reflects this,” she said.

Demand for privacy

Mike Cooke, director of organisation development at the London Borough of Camden, was reported to have taken home £107,100 last year. He did not mince his words regarding his inclusion on the list. “I think it’s unfair, misleading and inappropriate. For a start, the [Taxpayers’ Alliance] has printed information as if it is my salary, but it isn’t [accurate], so it’s misleading,” he said.

“Secondly, although I am a public servant I have a right to privacy and believe strongly I should be able to choose who I inform about my precise earnings. Finally, it’s my employer’s decision as to whether I am worth my salary, no-one else’s.”

Cooke pointed out that Camden was ranked one of the top three councils in the country by the Audit Commission. “In terms of my own job, my role is to help manage the council as a member of the board/management team, particularly leading on change management,” he said.

However, Glasgow City Council conceded that the money paid to senior management was a matter of public record, but moved swiftly to defend the £100,000 annual salary of Norma Aird, its head of corporate HR. A spokesman said: “Every salary in the council was reviewed last year under our workforce pay and benefits review. This applied from the chief executive down.”

Transparency

Taxpayers would argue that they have the right to know how much senior town hall officials are paid, and hold councils accountable for their performance. Justifying the report, the Taxpayers’ Alliance said too often executives were rewarded handsomely, even when they failed, with local residents struggling to meet council tax hikes.

But Local Government Association claimed parts of the survey were outdated and inaccurate. Its deputy chief executive John Ransford criticised the alliance for making personal attacks on individuals. He also moved to defend the large pay packets. “When senior salaries in the private sector are compared with senior salaries in the public sector, the taxpayer gets very good value for money,” he said.

Many councils have bigger budgets and pay bills than FTSE 100 companies and to get the brightest people to deliver the best services for local people they need to pay a competitive wage, Ransford added.

Charles Cotton, reward adviser at the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development, echoed this point. “[Councils] are large, complex employers and the job weights of HR directors will reflect this,” he said.

Too much focus on an individual’s reward could obscure that person’s contribution to the organisation, he warned.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Simple pay transparency on its own was meaningless, Cotton said. “What adds value is whether the salary is appropriated to the size of their role and that the individual is adding value to the organisation,” he said. “When you consider the enormous importance of people in the delivery of public services, it may be that rather than there being too many [HR professionals] being paid at this level, there are too few.”

Public sector union Unison, which represents the vast majority of local government workers, insisted pay transparency in the sector was a good thing. A spokeswoman said it helped to ensure that people were being paid equally and correctly. “People should be paid properly for the jobs they do and transparency would ensure this. And if you want to decent public sector service, you should be prepared to pay for it.”

Gareth Vorster

previous post
Employer unrest as Euro unions back rewrite of Works Council Directive
next post
Aim of IES report was not simplistic “holy grail” search

You may also like

Six ways to kickstart conversations about team stress...

23 May 2025

Public sector workers gain pay rises of up...

22 May 2025

Deloitte scales back salary rises and promotions

22 May 2025

Workplace stress: Why it’s time to rebrand resilience

22 May 2025

Redefining leadership: From competence to inclusion

21 May 2025

Legislation could block bonuses at Thames Water

16 May 2025

Next to improve wage-setting transparency after shareholder pressure

16 May 2025

University of Salford launches Better Working Lives cluster

14 May 2025

Why HR burnout is a strategic issue

12 May 2025

Prioritising performance management: Strategies for success (webinar)

8 May 2025

  • 2025 Employee Communications Report PROMOTED | HR and leadership...Read more
  • The Majority of Employees Have Their Eyes on Their Next Move PROMOTED | A staggering 65%...Read more
  • Prioritising performance management: Strategies for success (webinar) WEBINAR | In today’s fast-paced...Read more
  • Self-Leadership: The Key to Successful Organisations PROMOTED | Eletive is helping businesses...Read more
  • Retaining Female Talent: Four Ways to Reduce Workplace Drop Out PROMOTED | International Women’s Day...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+