Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

MilitaryEconomics, government & businessExecutive payHR strategyPay & benefits

Public sector pay shake-up required for setting executive reward

by Helen Gilbert 28 Sep 2009
by Helen Gilbert 28 Sep 2009

Christopher Johnson, head of human capital for HR consultancy Mercer, believes the current piecemeal approach needs to change if the sector is to avoid accusations of fat-cat pay.

Executive reward in the public sector is currently set and monitored through different mechanisms such as pay review bodies, remuneration committees, management processes and political decisions.

But Johnson, who was a Cabinet Office director with responsibility for employee relations and reward across the Civil Service from 2005-08, has called for an independent pay body to advise on reward principles.

He believes executive pay decisions should be made through remuneration committees made up of independent members, while executive reward statements should be published in annual reports similar to those made by public companies.

Growing talent

Johnson told Personnel Today: “There is a lot of debate about fat cats in the public sector. It’s important that public sector pay is set at a level which enables the public sector to grow its own talent and to attract and retain talent.

“High level guidance, the use of remuneration committees and publication of pay in annual reports [means] you can demonstrate that people aren’t just paying themselves handsomely. You can show what the facts are.”

He added that current reward structures do not produce the right results and have a negative effect on leadership, professional expertise, effectiveness of senior management and the performance of public organisations.

In addition, he said, the cost of employing public sector talent is low compared with the private sector.

Local decision-making

Gill Hibberd, president of the Public Sector People Managers’ Association, agreed with Johnson’s recommendations, but stressed that pay decisions should still be made locally.

“To have a set of guiding principles would be helpful and useful as long as that is just what they are – guiding principles,” she told Personnel Today.

“I don’t see a problem in having independent advice, but that is all it should be. Decisions on executive pay are linked to local issues so [decisions] should be made at local level.

Hibberd backed the suggestion about publishing reward statements in annual reports. “This is the public sector. We are all accountable and [the public] has a right to know,” she said.

Current structures

At present, the levels of salaries and performance-related pay awards for the senior civil service are based on recommendations from the Senior Salaries Review Body, an independent committee which reports each year.

The SSRB also sets pay for ministers, senior military officials, judges and very senior NHS managers; however it does not represent local government.

Jonathan Baume, general secretary of the FDA, a union representing senior managers and professionals in public service, supported Johnson’s recommendations. “The FDA has supported calls for greater transparency about senior pay across the public sector.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

“We would support a move to establish similar principles in local government and elsewhere in the public sector. This should help rebuild the trust of taxpayers in the public service, which has undoubtedly suffered following the scandal surrounding MP’s allowances.

“Taxpayers will increasingly demand such transparency and the extension of the remit of pay review bodies into the wider public sector at senior levels will be a helpful development.”

Helen Gilbert

previous post
Pensions auto-enrolment will run till October 2015
next post
Mandelson promises ongoing support for skills and training

You may also like

Public sector workers gain pay rises of up...

22 May 2025

UK net migration slashed by half in one...

22 May 2025

Pay awards in real terms could fall for...

21 May 2025

Ryanair demands flight attendants pay back salary increase

21 May 2025

Minister defends Employment Rights Bill at Acas conference

16 May 2025

Legislation could block bonuses at Thames Water

16 May 2025

Next to improve wage-setting transparency after shareholder pressure

16 May 2025

CBI chair Soames accuses ministers of not listening...

16 May 2025

NHS Scotland staff accept two-year 8.2% pay deal

16 May 2025

University of Salford launches Better Working Lives cluster

14 May 2025

  • 2025 Employee Communications Report PROMOTED | HR and leadership...Read more
  • The Majority of Employees Have Their Eyes on Their Next Move PROMOTED | A staggering 65%...Read more
  • Prioritising performance management: Strategies for success (webinar) WEBINAR | In today’s fast-paced...Read more
  • Self-Leadership: The Key to Successful Organisations PROMOTED | Eletive is helping businesses...Read more
  • Retaining Female Talent: Four Ways to Reduce Workplace Drop Out PROMOTED | International Women’s Day...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+