Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Employment lawEquality, diversity and inclusionDisciplineDisability

Secretary of State for the Department for Work and Pensions v Alam

by Personnel Today 31 Dec 2009
by Personnel Today 31 Dec 2009

The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) was exempt from having to make reasonable adjustments when disciplining a disabled employee for leaving work early without permission, because it could not have known that the employee’s disability placed him at a disadvantage in this respect.


Mr Alam suffered from symptoms of depression and it was conceded that he was disabled for the purposes of the Disability Discrimination Act 1995. Alam arrived into work late one morning and asked for permission to leave work early to attend an interview for a second job, which he was anxious to secure because of financial worries. He was refused permission by two managers, but left work early nonetheless. The DWP disciplined him as a result. Alam then asked for a number of issues to be taken into account in mitigation, including his financial difficulties, that he had missed taking his medication that morning and felt agitated and unfit to carry on working. The DWP issued him with a 12-month written warning.


The tribunal found that Alam’s difficulty in asking for permission to leave work early was an effect of his disability and that in issuing the warning, the DWP had failed to make reasonable adjustments.


The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) disagreed and said that in this case the DWP was exempt from the duty to make reasonable adjustments. The DWP did not know and could not reasonably have been expected to know that his disability placed him at a disadvantage compared to a non-disabled person in relation to suffering difficulties in asking for permission to leave work early.


The EAT also confirmed the test to be applied when considering whether the exemption from the duty to make reasonable adjustments applies.


Key points




  • When deciding whether the duty to make reasonable adjustments applies, the question to ask is: did the employer know or ought it to have known that the employee was disabled and that this was liable to place them at a substantial disadvantage? If not, there is no duty to make adjustments.


  • In this case, the tribunal had leapt to the (incorrect) conclusion that Alam’s symptoms of depression would have made it difficult for him to ask for permission to leave work.

What you should do




  • Be aware that this decision does not change the duty to make adjustments.

 

 

 

 

 

 

.

Personnel Today
Personnel Today

Personnel Today articles are written by an expert team of award-winning journalists who have been covering HR and L&D for many years. Some of our content is attributed to "Personnel Today" for a number of reasons, including: when numerous authors are associated with writing or editing a piece; or when the author is unknown (particularly for older articles).

previous post
CIPD calls for £1,250 work placement subsidy for 16- to 17-year-olds
next post
Beijing Ton Ren Tan v Wang

You may also like

Autistic surgeon wins disability discrimination claim

1 Dec 2023

Legal expert calls new holiday pay regulations ‘incoherent’

30 Nov 2023

Cruise giant accused of planning ‘fire and rehire’...

24 Nov 2023

Burges Salmon takes home 2023 Employment Law Firm...

21 Nov 2023

McDonald’s: How can employers prevent sexual harassment?

21 Nov 2023

Browne Jacobson takes home 2023 Equality, Diversity and...

21 Nov 2023

Entain and McLaren F1 are favourites in the...

21 Nov 2023

Two-thirds say periods have negative impact on work

20 Nov 2023

Tesco equal pay test cases to move to...

17 Nov 2023

Working class employees earn £6k less a year

17 Nov 2023

  • How to spot and tackle imposter syndrome in the workplace PROMOTED | Half of all UK adults...Read more
  • BetterMe for Business: How to Build Wellness Culture at Work PROMOTED | Ever encountered a...Read more
  • Global growth with simple HR compliance (webinar) WEBINAR | In an increasingly global marketplace...Read more
  • Talent acquisition: How AI can complement a ‘back to basics’ approach PROMOTED | Artificial intelligence is now...Read more
  • What will it mean to be an HR professional in 2024? (webinar) WEBINAR | As we approach 2024...Read more
  • HR Budget Planning for 2024: Preparing your People Strategy PROMOTED | As organisations continue to adapt...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2023

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2023 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+