Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Economics, government & businessLatest NewsBusiness performanceEquality, diversity and inclusionHR practice

Skills and temp rights are main cause for concern so far in 2008

by Greg Pitcher 30 Apr 2008
by Greg Pitcher 30 Apr 2008

We may be just four months in to 2008, but already there have been plenty of flashpoints for the HR profession. Whether it be skills, diversity, flexible working, temp rights or the interminable debate over HR’s relevance to profit and loss accounts, the debates rage on.

We thought we would take a step back from the melée and look at what you’ve had to say in our news barometers so far this year. It makes for interesting reading.

Would you give staff time off to reach Level 2 qualifications?

The result: Yes 68% No 32%

THE STORY Skills secretary John Denham used Personnel Today to kick off 2008 with an appeal for employers to make it the year of staff training. Denham insisted a culture change was needed this year to achieve the targets Sandy Leitch set for 2020, calling for employers “to make skills training integral to their business”.

WE SAY Denham’s rallying call may have convinced two-thirds of you to commit to Level 2 training in our online poll, but evidence elsewhere suggests that momentum has not carried forward into the year. The Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (CIPD) last week published research showing that just 13% of employers had signed the skills pledge more than a year after its launch.

Do diversity professionals need their own organisation?

The result: Yes 14% No 86%

THE STORY The Learning and Skills Council (LSC) published a report in January based on 700 diversity practitioners that argued a diversity body should play a similar role to the CIPD, offering different membership levels, benchmarking, accredited qualifications and career pathways for diversity professionals. Lee Probert, director of equality and diversity at the LSC, said: “The equality and diversity practitioners we spoke to believe there is a gap in the support available to them.”

WE SAY You were pretty clear in your verdict that such an association was not needed. And perhaps you knew something that the LSC didn’t, as the idea seems increasingly likely to disappear along with the government-funded body itself. Sixteen weeks after the £230,000 research project was published, diversity professionals Personnel Today spoke to from the agency’s ‘interested parties’ list said they were rapidly losing that interest and that several such organisations, such as the National Centre for Diversity, already existed.

Should agency workers have the same rights as permanent staff?

The result: Yes 29% No 71%

THE STORY A controversial Bill giving agency workers the right to the same pay, pensions, benefits and training as directly employed staff came before Parliament for its crucial second reading in February. Labour MP Andrew Miller, who sponsored the Temporary and Agency Workers (Equal Treatment) Bill, told Personnel Today that HR professionals should seriously consider whether using temps on long-term contracts was really in the best interests of their organisation.

WE SAY In the biggest poll response of the year, seven in 10 of you were adamant that agency workers should not have the same rights as permanent staff. This reflects what many employer groups have long been saying – that such laws would diminish labour market flexibility, and put hundreds of thousands of temp jobs at risk. Despite this, on 22 February,

the Bill passed its second reading. It will now go to the committee stage this spring.

Does your HR team have a positive impact on the bottom line?

The result: Yes 55% No 45%

THE STORY Personnel Today’s 20-year anniversary issue in February led with the story that an in-depth study had finally proved the link between good HR and higher profits. The Work Foundation and the Institute for Employment Studies found that if an organisation increased its investment in HR by 10% it could boost gross annual profits by £1,500 per employee.

WE SAY Despite this weighty evidence, almost half of you remained unconvinced that you added to the profits of the business at all. If we had phrased the question slightly differently, perhaps we would have discovered that many in HR feel they cost the business in wages more than they give back in useful policies.

Has flexible working improved performance in your organisation?

The result: Yes 46% No 54%

THE STORY A Working Families report last month said that flexible working legislation had not worked for many employees since its introduction five years ago. The study of more than 5,000 calls to the charity’s helpline claimed that large numbers of employers had either ignored staff requests to work flexibly or had given unacceptable reasons for turning them down.

WE SAY Almost half of you said that flexible working had improved staff performance in your organisation, but roughly the same number said it had not. This suggests that while a good deal of employers are embracing modern working practices, many remain unconvinced of their merits. However, flexible working only looks set to increase in the near future, so it is up to HR professionals to make it work in their favour.

Avatar
Greg Pitcher

previous post
Managing expenses: trade secrets
next post
Flexible working: part-time, full potential?

You may also like

Employees going into office just 1.5 days a...

15 Aug 2022

Graduate and apprentice salaries shoot up in war...

15 Aug 2022

Personnel Today Awards 2022 shortlist: Excellence in Public...

15 Aug 2022

Hiring boom set to slow as employers come...

15 Aug 2022

Are you a ‘quiet quitter’?

12 Aug 2022

July saw highest number of job adverts for...

12 Aug 2022

Transport sector recruitment ‘should be overhauled to improve...

12 Aug 2022

Liz Truss comments on Civil Service dismissed as...

12 Aug 2022

Hot summers, hot desks – employment law advice...

12 Aug 2022

Sharp rise in firms offering enhanced parental leave...

11 Aug 2022
  • 6 reasons why work-based learning is better than traditional training PROMOTED | A recent Fortune/Deloitte survey found that 71% of CEOs are anticipating that this year’s biggest business disrupter...Read more
  • Strengthening Scotland’s public services through virtual recruiting PROMOTED | This website is Scotland's go-to place for job seekers looking to apply for roles in public services...Read more
  • What’s next for L&D? Enter Alchemist… PROMOTED | It’s time to turn off the tedious and get ready for interactive and immersive learning experiences...Read more
  • Simple mistakes are blighting the onboarding experience PROMOTED | The onboarding of new hires is a company’s best chance...Read more
  • Preventing Burnout: How can HR help key workers get the right help? PROMOTED | Workplace wellbeing may seem a distant memory...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2022

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2022 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+