Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • Maternity & Paternity
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • Maternity & Paternity
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Working from homeHybrid workingLegal sectorLatest NewsPay & benefits

Law firm says staff can work from home with 20% less pay

by Ashleigh Webber 3 May 2022
by Ashleigh Webber 3 May 2022 Shutterstock
Shutterstock

Staff at law firm Stephenson Harwood can choose to work from home permanently, but they will have to take a 20% pay cut.

Under its new hybrid and remote working policy, which took effect this month, full-time workers will have to be in the office 60% of the time unless they opt to sacrifice some of their salary for a full remote working contract.

According to legal sector news website RollOnFriday, which first reported the new policy, remote workers will still be required to work in an office at least one day per month, but their travel costs – including any hotel stays – will be covered by the firm.

“Like so many firms, we see value in being in the office together regularly, while also being able to offer our people flexibility”, a spokesman for Stephenson Harwood told RollOnFriday.

“For the vast majority of our people – and the candidates we speak to – our hybrid working policy works well.”

During the pandemic, the firm recruited new lawyers from outside of London on lower pay packages as they would not have to commute into the capital.

Home and hybrid working

Employers see hybrid working productivity gains, but want staff in offices

Hybrid working: executives returning to office less than employees

Time’s up for the office: Julia Hobsbawm speaks to Oven-Ready HR

It has extended the policy to existing staff, but they will have to sacrifice some of their pay. For example, a newly qualified lawyer on an annual salary of £90,000 will see their pay cut to £72,000. The spokesman said it was not expecting many staff to take up the offer.

Partners at the firm will not be eligible to take up the full-time home working offer, the firm told the Times.

Not solving a problem

Martin Williams, head of employment at law firm Mayo Wynne Baxter, wondered why the policy was being offered if few staff were expected to take it up.

“If working from home is going to have a detrimental effect on meeting customer demand or quality of the work produced, how does paying someone less overcome that problem?,” he said.

“It is hard to see how taking money away solves any of the issues an employer thinks they might have with people working from home – especially when they are saving money on office space.”

It is hard to see how taking money away solves any of the issues an employer thinks they might have with people working from home – especially when they are saving money on office space,” – Martin Williams, Mayo Wynne Baxter

Williams said it would be difficult for any employer to decline requests for remote working if staff have proven they can work effectively from home since the pandemic hit.

“Having inflexible blanket policies on working from home is not a sensible approach. What employers need to do is to manage employee expectations and consult with staff on a case-by-case basis,” said Williams.

Philip Richardson, head of employment law at Stephensons Solicitors, said employers were having to make tricky decisions about how best to keep offices thriving while accomodating employees’ desired working practices.

“There will be many different approaches to this issue, but cutting pay is going to raise eyebrows. Many employees feel just as productive, if not more so than if they were commuting into the office every day,” he said.

“If their work and output is of a high quality, some will view the decision as harsh to penalise employees solely on the basis of where that work is done. The risk, ultimately, is that employees don’t feel trusted and that may lead some to seek alternative employment.”

Recent research from Henley Business School found 27% of employees would be willing to take a pay cut to work from home full time. Those surveyed were willing to forego £3,300 per annum on average.

HR opportunities in professional services on Personnel Today


Browse more HR opportunities in professional services

Ashleigh Webber
Ashleigh Webber

Ashleigh is editor at OHW+ and part of the Personnel Today editorial team. Prior to joining Personnel Today in 2018, she covered the road transport sector for Commercial Motor and Motor Transport.

previous post
MPs call for parliament HR department
next post
Employers struggle with relevancy of health and wellbeing communications

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

You may also like

How firms need to comply with sponsor licence...

16 May 2022

Fears over skills as visa application times double...

12 May 2022

PwC staff to benefit from extended summer hours...

5 May 2022

EHRC’s legal fund for tackling race discrimination: what...

21 Apr 2022

Law firm pays out £900 to help with...

20 Apr 2022

How workplace culture should support employees’ wellbeing

13 Apr 2022

New rules proposed to outlaw bullying culture in...

14 Mar 2022

Barristers vote to decline work unless ‘chronic underfunding’...

14 Mar 2022

Lawyer fined and reprimanded for ‘hysterical’ women comments

9 Feb 2022

Smaller law firms lead on diversity while larger...

7 Feb 2022
  • What it really means to be mentally fit PROMOTED | What is mental fitness...Read more
  • How music can help to ease anxiety at work PROMOTED | A lot has happened since March 2020, hasn’t it?...Read more
  • Why now is the time to plug the unhealthy gap PROMOTED | We’ve all heard the term ‘health is wealth’...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2022

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2022 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • Maternity & Paternity
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+