Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Collective redundancyLatest NewsEmployment lawTrade unionsMinimum wage

The P&O Ferries sackings one year on

by Adam McCulloch 17 Mar 2023
by Adam McCulloch 17 Mar 2023 Photo: Shutterstock
Photo: Shutterstock

On the first anniversary of P&O Ferries’ sudden mass sacking of 786 seafarers, who were replaced by staff on far less pay and worse working conditions, UK unions have said there was still nothing stopping firms acting in a similar manner. 

In addition to a survey by transport union the RMT, the TUC has published a report gauging the government’s response to the sackings, which breached employment laws.

The RMT’s survey shows that hundreds of seafarers have left the industry or have taken early retirement, leaving the ferry and wider UK shipping industry in the midst of a labour shortage.

Some 80% of the sacked ratings at P&O Ferries had worked for the company for over 10 years but 70% were now either unemployed or working in other industries; 80% had reported significant impacts on their mental health.

A third of ratings were still waiting for all or some of their personal belongings to be returned from the ferries on which they worked. Unsurprisingly, the RMT members among the former P&O Ferries workers scored the government’s response to the sackings lowly, giving just two out of 10.

Crocodile tears

RMT general secretary Mick Lynch said the survey results highlighted the “longstanding damage done to our coastal communities and to employment and safety standards in the maritime industry”. He added that P&O-type mass sackings remained a threat for seafarers and accused ministers of shedding “crocodile tears” over the situation.

P&O Ferries scandal

TUC: Redundancies by P&O Ferries ‘must be a turning point in workers’ rights’

P&O Ferries chief ‘should step down’ but redundancies expose legal anomalies

P&O Ferries, pressure on MPs to back ‘fire and rehire’ ban

Non-disclosure clauses in redundancy agreements have dissuaded former P&O Ferries workers from speaking out over their treatment.

Only one of the workers refused to sign an agreement and took the case to an employment tribunal: John Lansdown, a sous-chef on a cross-Channel ferry.

He won a larger amount than his colleagues gained by signing the redundancy deals but donated his compensation to charity.

The TUC listed four breaches of law by P&O Ferries that had gone unpunished: the duty to consult when making collective redundancies; unfair dismissal of workers; failure to notify the relevant government authorities; and breach of director duties.

It accused P&O Ferries of exploiting loopholes in the minimum wage legislation to pay replacement agency worker crew as little as £5.15 per hour. And a failure to comply with international health and safety standards, jeopardising the safety of seafarers, passengers and the maritime industry as a whole.

The government initially condemned the sackings and, after P&O Ferries boss Peter Hebblethwaite had admitted the illegality of the firm’s actions, demanded he be removed from his post. It also promised sanctions and unlimited fines against the company and said it would introduce legislation to prevent the scenario happening again.

Legislation

A government spokesperson said: “We reacted swiftly and decisively against P&O Ferries’ appalling treatment of its staff.

“Having brought forward legislation to ensure seafarers are paid at least an equivalent to the UK national minimum wage, and establishing a new statutory code to deter ‘fire and rehire’, we are now working with our near European neighbours to further protect their welfare and pay.”

The TUC, however, says the government has reneged on all of its initial pledges to a greater or lesser extent. Martyn Gray, of Nautilus, told the Guardian newspaper: “The bill addresses something that wasn’t really the problem, minimum wage legislation. What P&O did was exploit various loopholes in trade union law.”

Among the government’s initial threats against P&O Ferries was an “unlimited fine”, but the Insolvency Service decided that the firm could not face a criminal prosecution.

The government has subsequently introduced the Seafarers’ Wages Bill, currently awaiting consideration of amendments before receiving royal assent.

The Bill could see a wage floor imposed that is equivalent to the UK minimum wage for work carried out in UK territorial waters (12 miles from the coastline). This will apply regardless of seafarers’ nationality or the ship’s flag.

Loopholes

The TUC maintains, however, there there are “gaping loopholes in the Bill meaning that employers whose ships don’t use UK ports 120 times per year or call at more than one UK port a total of 120 times per year will not fall within scope of the new minimum wage regulations.”

It added: “This will apply to crew on P&O Ferries’ services from Dover, Hull and Liverpool but only in UK territorial waters. Bilateral agreements with governments at the other end of these international routes are being pursued by ministers but these are voluntary agreements and progress has only been made with the French government.”

This meant there was a risk that P&O Ferries’ agency crews would “continue to be worked for dangerously long periods, for pay far below the rates negotiated with unions that P&O Ferries ripped up.”

The TUC added that threats by the government against P&O Ferries’ parent company DP World had not materialised. Transport secretary Grant Shapps had pledged to review and/or cancel deals with the Dubai-based shipping giant but instead the company is in line to profit hugely from freeports and Ministry of Defence contracts. In effect, the TUC said: “The government is rewarding P&O Ferries for their law breaking.”

Latest HR job opportunities on Personnel Today


Browse more human resources jobs

Adam McCulloch
Adam McCulloch

Adam McCulloch first worked for Personnel Today magazine in the early 1990s as a sub editor. He rejoined Personnel Today as a writer in 2017, covering all aspects of HR but with a special interest in diversity, social mobility and industrial relations. He has ventured beyond the HR realm to work as a freelance writer and production editor in sectors including travel (The Guardian), aviation (Flight International), agriculture (Farmers' Weekly), music (Jazzwise), theatre (The Stage) and social work (Community Care). He is also the author of KentWalksNearLondon. Adam first became interested in industrial relations after witnessing an exchange between Arthur Scargill and National Coal Board chairman Ian McGregor in 1984, while working as a temp in facilities at the NCB, carrying extra chairs into a conference room!

previous post
Passport Office workers announce five-week strike
next post
Met Police review will be damning, reports suggest

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

You may also like

How morale can be repaired after redundancies

31 Mar 2023

Civil service HR function has budget shortfall, union...

31 Mar 2023

Redundancy: What to do when making staff redundant

31 Mar 2023

Bupa Dental Care to cut 85 practices as...

29 Mar 2023

Accenture to cut 19,000 jobs

24 Mar 2023

Just Eat to stop employing its own couriers

22 Mar 2023

Amazon announces 9,000 more job losses

21 Mar 2023

Meta: 10,000 more jobs cuts and hiring freeze

14 Mar 2023

Twitter worker: ‘HR can’t tell me if I’m...

7 Mar 2023

Retail hit by almost 15,000 job losses in...

20 Feb 2023

  • Sodexo Engage – Mountain of lost benefits ebook PROMOTED | Help your people feel the impact of your benefits...Read more
  • Neurodiversity: How to make the workplace more inclusive (webinar) WEBINAR | Can your organisation truly be inclusive...Read more
  • How HR can facilitate internal talent mobility PROMOTED | Should internal talent mobility be a priority...Read more
  • Bereavement in the workplace: How training can help HR get it right PROMOTED | HR professionals play an essential role...Read more
  • UK workforce mental wellbeing needs PROMOTED | The mental wellbeing support employers are providing misses the mark...Read more
  • The Workplace Today Guide: Why it pays to support your staff’s financial health PROMOTED | The cost of living crisis has hit...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2023

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2023 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+